Doing a service to bump threads past the low effort spam.  Bump

@Drwas:

@raphjd:

The Three Stooges were more sensible than any liberal could be.

If you routinely post nothing but childish comments that do nothing to further the discussion, that is a NO NO.

Yeah, I thought there was an age restriction on this site? Apparently, immature/juvenile people still got here somehow.

@raphjd:

But liberals flip flop on whether they hate jews or not.

That reminds me… How on earth is Hillary so popular in NYC.. (which aniti-racist, civil rights activist, adulterous, Jesse Jackson calls "Hymie Town") when she despises jews, was best buddies with a high ranking leader of the KKK (and even eulogized him), tried to smear (or should I as shmear?) Bernie Sanders as being a jew, and stole the nomination from jew Sanders?

I must interject something here.  I don't buy into the idea that someone is a Christian, Jew, Muslim, etc. just because their relatives are of some religious faith.  Someone's assumed faith doesn't bother me, as long as they don't adhere to it literally.  I could easily write thousands of pages about this, but pretty much all religions are similar in that they enslave people of other religions, perform barbaric acts that would put them in prison such as animal and human sacrifices.  And believing that no matter how "good" a person is, they are doomed unless they believe in one specific doctrine and adhere to it.  Perhaps the most credible religion is that which cuts through the bullshit and mocks the other religions.  Satanism does that, and was originally created not as a religion but to piss off Catholics.  But he problem with Satanism is that some nuts decided to worship it seriously with evil.  Then there are the Pastafarians.. whose deity is the almighty flying spaghetti monster, and they were colanders on their heads.

People need to keep their crazy beliefs to themselves.. and never impinge upon others unless those others are impinging upon them.. as is the case with the moonbat libt*rds currently trying to impeach out President Trump.  The same goes for sexual practices.  People would object to two twinks sucking cock on a street corner.  I happen to object to breeders feeling each other up and tongue kissing in public.  My eyes don't need to be exposed to breeder's nasty activities, and I don't expect that breeders want to see two guys doing the same thing.    I'm not in favor of a ban on straight people having sex in their own homes (although it might not be a bad idea), nor am I in favor of a ban on gay guys engaging in gay stuff in their own homes.  Some of you may remember cases in which police entered houses for various reasons such as a search warrant, and found gay people engaged in fellatio.. and although nothing else was found, they arrest the people for engaging in fellatio!  Which is considered sodomy.. and illegal in some states such as Texas.

... now some moonbat with reply with a complaint about my message rambling and not being on-topic.   I pity the moonbat that does that.  Go ahead.. make my millennium!

https://www.bing.com/search?q=pastafarian+image&form=EDGTCT&qs=PF&cvid=8368e95fec584bfcb070b2db6adfe599&cc=US&setlang=en-US

probably because a practice that not only mutilates babies but also includes oral pedophilia makes certain people look bad. thought policing is all the rage dont you know?

You need to educate yourself about FC.  There are 3 categories, whether you like it or not.

You are a misandrist by justifying it happening to boys, but defending the western ban on it happening to girls.

I hate how feminist (women and their cucks) screech about equality, but ignore areas where females have special rights.  They then get butt hurt that men fight for gender equality for men.

@Drwas:

@strangeloop:

Reported for spamming.

Truth hurts I guess!  :cheesy2:

You're literally spamming without even adding any content of your own.  Do you have anything to add?  All you're doing is copy-pasting articles.  You know anyone who is conservative can easily do the same thing right?

Is it even possible for you to think for yourself?  I doubt it….

@Frederick:

I sense a shift in the liberal community…

They had boldly and unabashedly put all their support in Hillary Clinton, and even beyond losing the election, she has done nothing but embarrass her brethren since the loss.
She vociferously blames Comey and the DNC for her loss, making her a pariah to her own supporters.
She's essentially doing a "scorched earth" approach to excuse her loss.

Now they are parting ways with scum like Hillary and Kathy Griffin and will try to pump up some other liberals that haven't yet made complete asses out of themselves.

She's been in the public eye like once since the election. The only time I ever see her brought up is when someone defending Trump needs an easy deflection or someone to vilify.

Also, I wouldn't use the word "unabashedly". The support for Bernie Sanders wasn't negligible. And I would argue much of the rabid support for her was less about substance and more about being the not-Trump nominee.

Back on topic.

Andraya Yearwood is trans m2f in name only.  He has done absolutely nothing to transition, not even shave his mustache.  This the same with Elliot Cope, but at least AY isn't using all kinds of mental gymnastics to justify the non change "trans".

It seems like the best thing to do, for SJWs and feminists, is to eliminate all gendered sports and have "whatever you are" football league and whatnot.  This would allow everyone to compete however they identify and it would also prove feminists right that there is no difference between males and females.

Why are you bringing up an old thread? Yes I believe that hydrogen peroxide has the ability to cure almost all diseases. I do believe that. So what? Until you look at the science, don't criticize me…

@Frederick:

@sutieday:

@Frederick:

@sutieday:

@aadam101:

It's pretty ironic that the JOBS JOBS JOBS president can't seem to hire anyone…..

"I will be the greatest jobs president that god has ever created", Donald Trump. But, he's only willing to hire the super rich and oil/banking executives  :laugh:

You nearly said something relevant by accident.
If you hire poor people…. you are at very high risk for those people to be bribed or coerced by money.  Even wealthy people such as the Clintons and Obama will pretty much say anything if paid enough money to do it.

I'm assuming you have statistics to back your claim? Or evidence? Of course you don't!

There are some things that are self-evident.. such as that you are a vagina. 
Obviously, it is far easier to bribe someone who has $10,000 in the bank than it is to bribe someone with a billion in the bank. 
That brings up another issue.. if someone is an activist, they are not going to have a lot of money unless they are corrupt, and they could easily be bought by someone like George Soros - who is insane and worth $25 billion.

I will not stoop to your level of name calling, this is "politics & debate" not politics & rhetoric.