Sometimes I wonder whether the alt-right guys really just want to create an all-white ethno-state for themselves.
Such a dumb ass statement.
No, many on the far-right (alt-right) want to ban immigrants from all countries except Europe, and even then only allow those that are white. Conservative extremists like Ann Counter have suggested this. So to claim that some may have this idea of a whites only ethno-state is not so farfetched.
It is farfetched honey.
Also, if you are going to say things like that, you need to provide a link to what you are talking about. I know you like to make things up yourself, and don't want to be constrained by actual facts.
I went ahead and looked up for you. What Coulter said was there should be a TEMPORARY ban on immigration from ALL countries. She didn't exclude Europe, and said nothing about white people.
Just how long do you think you should be allowed to post blatantly false statements in this forum without being muted? What's that thing you are always doing to other people? Oh yeah.. I remember..
Also, the alt-right pro-claims "white genocide" as a reason for banning immigrants. There is no genocide of white people, they just may have smaller families on average as compared to their ethnic counterparts.
What what? He uses Jared's back channel? This thread is getting racier all the time
About that channel allegation.. it seems to me that there SHOULD be back channels to communicate with other governments without having the communications made public. Of course that can sort of be done through ambassadors, but that has big problems too.
Here is one example that I can think of at the moment: In Iran, they have elected leaders.. HOWEVER, the elected leader is actually a puppet. The non-elected religious leader is the true power, and the elected leader governs with the permission of the religious nut leader. It's very much like a King who has governors. The governor is the one operating the government, but must answer to the King. Likewise, it is virtually impossible to have a rational, meaningful communication with another leader when it is done in public or the leader is not able to speak freely.
In the case of Jared Kushner, it was the Russian ambassador who was suggesting a back channel. Yes, a back channel was discussed, but it wasn't Jared that initiated it.
As for leaders initiating sneaky back channel deals with Russia… watch this: Youtube Video
And don't forget Slippery Hillary's deal with Russia.. which benefit herself.. in which she sold Russian 20% of the USA uranium reserves! In exchange, the Clinton foundation got $31 million and a pledge for another $100 million!!! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AHiuGbwvDww
LOCK HER UP!
No one is arguing that back channels are an essential and appropriate part of international diplomacy. Most even grant that it was appropriate for Jared to lay the groundwork for one with the Russians. However, considering using Russian facilities to hide the communications from the American national security apparatus borders on treason.
The Hilary allegation is old news. She is not president and her political career is over. Move on.
Hillary is not old news until this nonsense about the 2016 election is put to rest. It sure isn't put to rest now is it? Oh wait, I forgot.. according to moonbat rules, the left can attack all they like about anything going back to the "big bang", but nobody else can refer to anything to counter their attacks.
Apparently it was the Russian ambassador that came up with the idea for the back channel.. so whatever the plan was.. is not Jared's fault and certainly not Trump's fault. Also, since this back-channel was never implemented, nor were even any plans made - it is completely baseless and irrelevant. The world has not yet gotten to the point of prosecuting ideas.
Lastly, I fail to see why the act of communicating with another country is treason. Again.. an examples of treason are Hillary selling Russia 20% of the uranium in the USA to Russia in exchange for $131 million paid to the Clinton Foundation… Or Obama giving hundreds of billion$ to Iran - in exchange for.. well.. we got NOTHING in return for that apparently.
First the legitimacy of the 2016 election has been put to rest. No one has ever suggested that the Russians were able to change vote tallies. They just tried to screw with us and our thinking.
Second, how are you so sure the use of Russian facilities was the ambassador's idea? Jared should have known better. And how are you so sure it was never implemented? Are you a Russian spy?
Third, the Clinton foundation is not the Clinton Personal Wallet. I admit some family members get salaries and they fly around the world on private jets, but the vast majority of the money goes to pay for HIV drugs for poor children.
Fourth, the billions for Iran was always their money, we just released it from sequester.
Our policy on Chechnya makes it a dumpster fire. When the Sovet Union fell apart, Chechnya fought a war a separatist war to break away from Yeltsin's Russia. Yeltsin fought to keep Chechnya. When Putin came to power, the war was raging, and the US forced a settlement down Russia's throat, who was weak at that time, to allow Russia to keep Chechnya in exchange for Muslim autonomy in Chechnya. Any change on our position in Chechnya permits Putin to reopen that can of worms. We never should have forced the original Chechnya settlement on Russia.
Be careful. The liberals have made up their own rule that they won't discuss anything from the past on which we now know the facts. All they want to talk about is speculation, anonymous sources, and current investigations. Do not antagonize them with facts! How DARE you disrupt their fantasies!
To redeem yourself, I suggest you purchase a case of Play Doh and a box of coloring books, and donate them to your nearest liberal college. And do NOT forget to include crayons! In fact, include EXTRA crayons because they like to chew on them.
Actually, the police did screw up royally here. Several family members in law enforce. New SOP for active shooter/mass casualty situations is not to wait and establish perimeter. Post-Columbine the SOP is to immediately charge in, neutralize the threat, and secure the scene for EMS. None of that occurred here. The police held back waited for SWAT, tried to negotiate. None of this is SOP.
May a new virgin twink appear at the foot of your bed every evening!
I would add one thing though.. this situation didn't blow up into a mass casualty situation until well AFTER the SWAT team arrived. Had the cop done his job to begin with, this massacre would have been avoided. I would also add that not one of the police suffered a significant injury. 103 people injured, 50 of them killed. I wouldn't be surprised if over 1000 rounds of ammunition were bouncing off the walls in there, and yet not one significant injury to a cop? I cannot believe that any of the cops put themselves in any great danger. Should a cop put themselves in danger? Well.. YES! That is what they are PAID for. If my job is to clean a restroom or be a plumber, my job would include dealing with human feces. If my job is to fight a war, I have to fight that war and not hide in an underground bunker.
Last year, a cop chased a car with young girls in it at very high speeds. That is mistake #1. They should have kept their distance and waited for other patrol cars to intercept them. Instead, they went chasing them like an episode of "The Dukes Of Hazzard" putting pedestrians and other cards at risk. The 3 girls - perhaps only the one driving was a criminal - wound up driving into a retention pond. The car started to sink. 20 officers surrounded the retention pond and not one of them went in to attempt any rescue.. not even the cops that were hired as trained divers. It was night time, and they were afraid their might be snakes in the retention pond. All 3 girls drowned. The criminal sheriff defended the cops actions (and got re-elected on Nov 8, 2016).
Being a cop is one of the most difficult jobs there is.. and sadly.. there are very few cops who do their job competently. If I call a cop.. I expect Joe Friday and Frank Gannon to show up.. not Barney Fife or the cast of Reno 911.
It's obvious when you see a certain person's numbers shoot up by 50 points a day, what they are doing. The conservatives have all seen DrWas' number of down votes he gives us never stops shooting up. All the conservatives know who the 2 main people are that constantly give thumbs down on every post no matter what is actually said or topic.
Muslims and Liberals keep telling us how loving and peaceful islam is toward LGBTs. So I don't see what is wrong with the concept of sending these people to muslim countries to prove us wrong.
Oh but Bernie said all those big CEOs were greedy whores, so now you care about what they think? The only people that matter opinion-wise are the voters, so nobody actually gives a shit what they think. A waste of a post.
Five activists were arrested in Moscow Thursday morning while attempting to deliver a petition demanding Russian authorities investigate the kidnapping and torture of gay men in Chechnya.
Several dozen men have been detained and tortured by authorities in Chechnya in the past few months, according to reports by the Russian independent news outlet Novaya Gazeta. Chechnya is a semi-autonomous region inside Russia, and its leader, Ramzan Kadyrov, responded to the reports by saying "we have never had gay men" in the republic.
Russian President Vladimir Putin said he'd order federal authorities to assist in an investigation after being pressed on the issue by German Chancellor Angela Merkel earlier this month, but there is concern whether this investigation will be allowed to do its work.
The petition drive was organized by a trio of Russia LGBT organizations in partnership with US-based online activist platforms All Out, Avaaz, and Change.org. The five activists were delivering 2 million signatures to Russia's prosecutor general, the head of the agency that oversees federal investigations, when they were detained by the Moscow police. The Russia LGBT Network issued a statement saying they were arrested under a law prohibiting unauthorized public gatherings.
But the Republicans who had a guy shoot up a pizza parlor with children inside it to investigate "the truth about hillary clinton's pizza parlor sex ring" are completely blameless. No danger there.
Frederick you are the real moonbat here and you are closer to the shooter than you are to normal republicans and normal democrats. Crazies have taken over the discourse on both sides and the only solution is for normal folk to shun the crazies.
Again with the excuse "well they did it TOO!" wahh!
By the way.. the story TheSock is referring to is in this link.
A man went into a pizza parlor said to be involved in a child sex ring and shot off one round and nobody was injured. The reason this story was barely noticed is because the moonbats didn't want anybody talking about that child sex ring and that pizza parlor.
What happens is.. people involved in criminal acts… such as pedophile sex rings, the mafia, etc... make huge political contributions to buy political favors and protection. Hillary would take money from ANYBODY to buy more power. This is what happened, and those are the results.
Sanctions only hurt the average person, not the assholes in charge. We saw that with nearly 40 years of sanctions on Iran. Oddly, this is why we don't sanction African countries.
Russian elites have become very rich at the expense of its citizens (sounds like another country….) they send their children to Western schools, and deny Russian citizens their wealth. They don't care about the burden of International sanctions on the average Russian citizen, because they use Western banks.
