And why would you want to get high using meth and GHB a combo that is used when one wants to have hours of hardcore sex, not being stuck in a 737 for hours.
addiction or unconsciousness ???
http://beat.drugabuse.com/7-shocking-facts-about-meth-in-the-gay-community/
I dated smokers…
It never worked out well in the long term.
I can stand it for a while but I end up being neurotic, I really dislike the smell.
The gay porn industry has a trend : nobody asks for a book anymore, ya just need a criminal record.
He will be successful! 
He had a :blondmom: xD
Every sane one would not release a serial killer like him: there are no reported regression cases for that kind of murderers.
We would like to think about s.k. in a Dexter-like fashion, but they are more variegated in a many major ways …
ethnicity, sex, isolation or involvement in community, i.q., reasons, etc
They have been fascinating our culture since years because a sane one is not able to understand them.
So when I read "I don't even know what to think...", I rejoice you're ok. :hug2:
This is a typical case for a whole range of things:
Given this, I would worry more for quite each one of the other actives left in there..
:panic: & :an2: with Grindr
Wow what a change ! He's definitely hotter these days :cheesy2:
Normal sex recipe:
Bottom partner lies on his back
Top partner penetrates
Missionary position (other positions non-negotiable)
Insert non-comprehensible generic grunts and sighs of pleasure at moderate volume.
Once a partner finishes he helps the other one.
Once both are done they compliment the deed with meek adjectives.
Each partner goes to his side of the bed and proceeds to sleep.
:love:
Two things. First, it is their right to protest about anything, second, what is is about the 'Sanctuary status'? I mean if you're a student you can have a student visa and stay to study. If you are illegal then you are paying for the education yourself because you don't get financial aid if you aren't a citizen.
You said it: if you're a student you can have a student visa and stay to study.
It's already by de jure and nobody wants to revoke that.
What they're asking is pointless if it's limited to this interpretation.
What they hope to do is to turn colleges and universities into day cares for illegal immigrants.
That's concerning because every educational institute should teach a student to respect the law, not to break it.
It's your right to protest against a policy you do not agree to,
it's not right to ask institutions to turn into an illegal black market of protection.
Yes an illegal would be paying entirely the fee, but financial support is partially given directly (everyone benefits).
It would be an aggravating if taxpayer funded colleges and universities will become a beacon of lawlessness.
This is concerning, not in the protest per se, but for the background:
you do not understand how to get what you want
because your education did not teach you how to use your skills in the most effective way
(I agree with you on this: let's vote, millennials might have changed everything),
and because nobody understand anymore what should be legally doable or not.
Remarking again: one of the many symptoms of the American school system quality ::)
one of the many symptoms of the American school system quality ::)
Students need to realize that having access to higher education doesn't make them special, but makes them more indebted to their country and society. Instead of protesting they should be thinking in solutions agreeable to both ends.
+1 for this
Students have to understand:
<<
I got here because I'm privileged.
I burned through my savings to move myself across the countries.
What if I had a parent, partner or child that depended on me?
What if I couldn't move across the country or afford to take such a risk with finances?
I got here because I had a community.
They supported me, encouraged me, gave me their time and most importantly made me feel safe.
We must to do better.
WE NEED ALL THE IDEAS FROM ALL THE PEOPLE.
What's happening in the student community is essentially a self-referential haughtiness:
"I'm educated so I know what's best for you. Listen, shut up and do it."
They need to listen to the other communities.
Filipino in my experience !
But it depends on the one you're looking at …. :hug:
Only if he does not like that much the bottom or if does not like the situation or if ….
Certainly not for the ass tightness :blink: 
Proud to be a geek 
パーソナルコンピュータ, table games, RPGs, 魂, 漫画, series, cinema :cheers:
The person below me is pornaholic
Plage Inc. & Toy Defense 3 for mobile 
Chicken Invaders, Company of Heroes, Dungeon Siege I e II, Rayman Origins, Spore, Total Annihilation, Supreme Commander I e II, Trivial Pursuit. :cheesy2:
Again, you're not hearing me… All of this is fine and dandy for obvious reasons if you are already known to be HIV+... What you still haven't answered is exactly what you're referring to as what you're saying now does not sound like what I understood you to be saying originally. What I'm getting at is making the HIV test itself mandatory to determine whether or not you have HIV in the first place. THAT is what I'm getting at... It's all fine and dandy to have regulations for controlled substances and the processes that you have to follow. I get that part.
Where my issue comes into play is making the HIV test itself mandatory. Both in Canada as well as in the United States, there is this thing called the "Patient Bill of Rights". One of the things that it outlines very clearly is that when it comes to testing and/or treatment, the patient has a basic fundamental right to refuse. Furthermore, from the safety perspective, being HIV+ in and of itself does not possess an immediate safety issue to the general public. Furthermore, making this test mandatory automatically sets the assumption that if you work in the aviation industry, automatically you must be sexually active and are promiscuous by nature. This in an of itself helps promote the perpetual stigma that still surrounds HIV to this very day, even in larger communities. While I agree that if you're sexually active, especially if you're promiscuous, it only makes sense to get STI testing, this does not mean that working in the aviation industry automatically means that you are sexually active. Also, making the test mandatory both violates your basic fundamental right to refuse the testing, and it puts you at a disadvantage, largely for insurance purposes when you begin to build a paper trail, even if the test results are negative. Simply put, making it mandatory when being HIV+ in an of itself is in no way a safety issue, only further promotes the everyday stigma that we as people living with are faced with on a daily basis on many levels.
Thank you, I am now able to understand the reason of your interest.
In my experience if you're not aware of your status then they test you.
Because of the "Patient Bill of Rights" it's probable you can decline,
but I have never seen someone asking not to get tested,
most of the times you don't even know what's going on and hope only to end up asap (boredom).
The FAA rules are more relaxed than any other, so I wouldn't complain.
As an example (Europe) [JAR–FCL 3.190,3.310] : test mandatory + HIV positivity is disqualifying.
To obtain the required medical certification you have to make blood tests (HIV included).
Since the JAA regulation is based upon the FAA regulation I would bet that apply equally to the US, Canada, Australia, … too
Could you explain me why is this so wrong ?
In order to pass their exams you have to agree to expose so many personal things,
I am not able to get why this is particularly an issue.
( after all this happens in a medical institute plenty of doctors bound by professional secrecy )
:love: the one in soho :love:
p.s.: we already have Deadpool, in the comic version he's quite pansexual.