The difference is that my social justice is provable by facts.
Actually, in many places certain "unacceptable" speech is illegal. Lot's of places in Europe have criminalized denying the holocaust. It's illegal to dispute the official version of the holocaust. You can't even accept the holocaust in general while disputing certain facts of the official history.
Canada is now in the process of criminalizing if you don't use some special snowflake's made up personal pronouns. We aren't just talking calling someone he or she, but anything they make up and claim as their personal pronouns.
Back in 2013, feminists in Scandinavia tried to ban criticism of feminists/feminism. I don't know how successful that was.
The EU banned "hate speech" but LGBTs aren't included in that.
In the UK it's illegal to cause offense.
By "free speech" most people refer to the kind granted by the US constitution.
You still haven't answered me. Why do you need a room full of stuffed toys and Disney films, because of a lecture you have no intent on going to?
Schools are being forced into become echo chambers, not places of learning, by whiny selfish brats. Thankfully, some universities are now starting to fight back.
TRUE, some MRAs are pigs, but there are only 2 types of feminists; those that hate men and those that do nothing but sit on the sofa. You will never find a feminist campaign that directly benefits men, or has a negative effect on women, in the name of gender equality. For example, the RAPE IS RAPE campaign claimed that they wanted ALL rape made illegal. However, they did not include men being raped by women, even when the woman was in a position of authority, such a prison guard or teacher. Not surprisingly, they said that women can rape other women.
In several countries, feminists have fought to keep the sex crimes laws biased against men. This the same with domestic violence laws. In fact in India, it is legally impossible for a woman to commit a sex crime of domestic violence.
Feminists around the globe are fighting to stop sending women to prison while fighting to make it easier to send men to prison. In fact, in the west, most universities are losing "due process" for males accused of any sort of sex "crime", even if it would not be a crime in the same town.
In several countries, feminists fought to prevent equalizing the retirement ages. This happened in the UK, but eventually the government got some balls and started the process anyway. Last I heard is that when I retire in 20 years, women will still get to retire 2 years earlier.
The official UK judge's manual states that women are to be treated with "extra special leniency". This in both the so-called "equalities" section and the sentencing section. Where are the feminists who believe in gender equality on this one?
The only gender-neutral sex crime law in the UK is; (paraphrasing) anyone who has sex with a person under the age of 16 is guilty of having sex with a child. Where are all the gender equality feminists when all these women walk out of court with nothing but a slight slap on the wrist while men go to prison for up to 20 years.