Posts made by raphjd

@alibix:

@Eridanos:

@raphjd:

I don't think it's quite that.

The part I was referring to is the bit of C-16 that requires you to call someone by their personally chosen pronouns.    Traditionally, personal pronouns are HE, HIM, HIS, SHE, HER, HERS, THEY, THEY'RE, THEIRS.    Now it can literally be anything a person can imagine.

Excluding the muslim issue, Canada is only beaten for the SJW award by Sweden.

Oh. Thanks for clearing that up. But still…dammit, human relationships are as complicated as they are without all this nonsense. And somehow they manage to tangle them up more...

This is a textbook example of what I'm trying to talk about. Extreme exaggeration to make this huge, everpresent enemy that doesn't really exist.

http://sds.utoronto.ca/blog/bill-c-16-no-its-not-about-criminalizing-pronoun-misuse/

I just noticed that you used an article by a Professor of Gender Diversity Studies.    Can we say "biased"?!    You really should watch the debates on C-16.  You can find the videos on YouTube.

Mixed drinks are cocktails.

I don't have a "signature" drink, because I like a variety of drinks.    At home, we drink mostly Porté and Amaretto, though not together.

Probably, but then again you never know.

All porn is extremely profitable.

A "gay" porn actor can make between $250 and $10,000 per scene, depending on how big the studio is and how popular the actor is.  The more popular the actor is, the more likely they will be able to sell sex related items with their name on it.

It depends on the guy and the glasses.    Nothing is fixed in stone.

In the UK, it's between £500 - £1,000, depending on the clinic.

Add another £500'ish if you can't get the needed tests done by your GP.    Oddly, getting an STD test done is quicker through your GP than going through the local (if you have one) STD clinic.    Some GPs charge up to £25 per test result, though many will do it for free if you talk to them and let them know what you are doing it for.    Our GP is extremely good and is doing everything we need for surrogacy for free.

In the UK, adoption is free as long as you adopt a kid who's currently in foster care.    This is starting to change though.

Scotland has very limited adoption opportunities and is a horrible process.    We had a homophobic social worker write lies about us, but mainly me, so we were disqualified from adoption.  We appealed and won, but still couldn't adopt because they said we were tainted by the whole process and wouldn't work well with the council during the adoption process because we wouldn't fully trust them anymore.

Growing up, we have various pets, but there was always at least 1 dog in the house.

I guess you ignored this bit from your link;

Non-discrimination on the basis of gender identity and expression may very well be interpreted by the courts in the future to include the right to be identified by a person’s self identified pronoun.   The Ontario Human Rights Commission, for example, in their Policy on Preventing Discrimination Because of Gender Identity and Expression states that gender harassment should include “ Refusing to refer to a person by their self-identified name and proper personal pronoun”.  In other words, pronoun misuse may become actionable, though the Human Rights Tribunals and courts.  And the remedies?  Monetary damages, non-financial remedies (for example, ceasing the discriminatory practice or reinstatement to job) and public interest remedies (for example, changing hiring practices or developing non-discriminatory policies and procedures).  Jail time is not one of them.

Just because prison isn't one of the punishments, doesn't mean that refusing to use some made up personal pronouns is being criminalized.

Not cleaning up after your dog (dog fouling) is a criminal offense with no jail time.   The same with littering.   The only difference is the amount of the financial penalty.    Many things are criminal offenses, that have no jail time.

You are soooooooooooo desperate to make everyone believe that SJWs don't exist, that you are willing to distort anything that counters your stance.

If you want real world examples of SJWs, then watch YouTube videos.   There are countless videos of SJWs doing what they do best.   You get to see their logic coming from their own mouths.  You get to see how peaceful and lovely they are when someone disagrees with them.  You get to see them pour piss on Lauren Southern and try to run away but get caught, because she doesn't agree that there are unliited genders.

You could research all the things I said about feminists/feminism, so you will see that I'm right.

Don't use Tumbler, MTV Decoded, Laci Green and other SJWs to get your info.

Don't listen to Obama and Hillary about SJW "facts".  Do the right thing, look at official government stats that proven them wrong or liars.

Don't automatically assume that people who disagree with you are Trump supporters.   I hate Trump, just as much as I hate Obama and Hillary.

Don't assume that we're all right wing, because I've only ever voted for 1 republican.    Don't assume that people on the right are homophobic.  It was the Tory party that gave the UK equal marriage, not Labour or LibDems.   The Labour party said they weren't going to revisit Equal marriage because gays civil partnerships.  "Separate and somewhat equal" was good enough for the UK's version of the Democrats.

It shows what SJWs are like.    SJWs are always like this.

YES, a few colleges are finally growing some balls and standing up to the SJWs.  SO WHAT?!  It doesn't mean that SJWs don't actually exist as you want everyone to believe.

I hope you realize that posting that link helps me, not you.

@alibix:

@Eridanos:

@raphjd:

I don't think it's quite that.

The part I was referring to is the bit of C-16 that requires you to call someone by their personally chosen pronouns.    Traditionally, personal pronouns are HE, HIM, HIS, SHE, HER, HERS, THEY, THEY'RE, THEIRS.    Now it can literally be anything a person can imagine.

Excluding the muslim issue, Canada is only beaten for the SJW award by Sweden.

Oh. Thanks for clearing that up. But still…dammit, human relationships are as complicated as they are without all this nonsense. And somehow they manage to tangle them up more...

This is a textbook example of what I'm trying to talk about. Extreme exaggeration to make this huge, everpresent enemy that doesn't really exist.

http://sds.utoronto.ca/blog/bill-c-16-no-its-not-about-criminalizing-pronoun-misuse/

Did you even read that link?

Just because there isn't a prison sentence assigned to this, it's still got plenty of punative measures in the courts.  It's nice how you try to make it appear that I lying about it.

Holy fucking shit, I'M the one in a fucking echo chamber???

You're the one that posts SJW bullshit all day on tis forum so that people can jack off with you on how bad SJWS are.
I'm the one in a fucking echochamber, jesus christ.

SJW seem to just be a convenient term to label anyone you don't like. And you are fucking obsessed - just as obsessed as SJWs are.

Your desperation to deny that SJWs are common place shows that you are clearly in an echo chamber.  That, or you are being dishonest.

I actually think that you are in an echo chamber and you don't notice SJWs because they fit your confirmation biases.    You clearly don't view all the SJW actions over the last decade as anything odd or bad.

LOL, I think you mean like how your side loves to scream "Trump supporter", "racist", "homophobe" and everything else at anyone who disagrees with you.

@Eridanos:

@raphjd:

If SJWs are as rare as you claim, then you have to explain Canada's Bill C-16.

That's the bill that criminalizes people who refuse to call people by any made up personal pronoun they want to use, among other things.

So if I refuse to call someone cisgender, or pansexual or non-binary, non comforming or whatever label they picked up in tumblr (no matter how little sense it makes to me) for themselves, then I'm commiting a hate crime?

Way to go Canada…. (It's all your fault USA, you infected the nice Canadians! D:< )

That's it. I'm going to Australia.

I don't think it's quite that.

The part I was referring to is the bit of C-16 that requires you to call someone by their personally chosen pronouns.    Traditionally, personal pronouns are HE, HIM, HIS, SHE, HER, HERS, THEY, THEY'RE, THEIRS.    Now it can literally be anything a person can imagine.

Excluding the muslim issue, Canada is only beaten for the SJW award by Sweden.

@alibix:

@SemenDemon:

It's hard to ignore something when it starts to impact the cultural landscape beyond the Internet (and SJW-ism has done just that, if that weren't already glaringly obvious). Sadly, enough people got fed up with the "vocal minority" of narcissistic, lying, self-righteous, hypocritical social justice fruitcakes, and now we have Donald Trump as our president (Thanks, SJW's. Really proves how effective your tactics of shutting down "the opposition" have been). Partisan politics are just political football for insular, narcissistic assholes. That is precisely why the US political pendulum keeps swinging between idiotic extremes, instead of happy mediums.

Quite a few of my friends more or less fit into the SJW or SJW-parroting category. I just can't fucking talk to them about political shit. I just have to smile and nod and let them go on until they run out of steam.

Vocal Minority? To be honest, the only time I EVER hear about SJWs is when other people on the internet complain about them.

If SJWs are as rare as you claim, then you have to explain Canada's Bill C-16.

That's the bill that criminalizes people who refuse to call people by any made up personal pronoun they want to use, among other things.

@Nagamaki:

My Universities have always had queer spaces and spaces for First Nation people and my country is prob at least as racist and homophobic as the USA. They're a good idea and have been around loooong before "safespace" became common in the lexicon, sometimes the right wing students post slur words, christian anti-lgbtqi hate speech and their own stupid protests, posters demanding removal of prayer rooms (that are non-denominational anyway) etc - so they're an escape from that.

I would agree with you IF everyone had a "safe space" of their own.  Sadly, due to identity politics and the oppression olympics, certain groups are deemed not worthy of equality.

When I was at university, there were no "safe spaces".  Everyone shared the public spaces and for the most part, there were no problems.

I don't really understand the demand to remove a bookstore? Sure it's commercial, but so is everything grad students are working on in labs, including cures for diseases and students should be buying books.

SJWs never think rationally.

Claremont McKenna College creates a "safe space" where students can be free from white people

Youtube Video

Remember,  we're told that SJWs don't really exist.   :crazy2:

There's plenty more stories like this.

@alibix:

@raphjd:

You are too limiting on what an SJW is.

SJWs include feminists, BLM, "Just Believe", the "Slut Walk", "Take Back the Night" and many, many others.

It's Norweign male politicians who apologize to their muslim rapist.

It's Swedish feminist Left Party politicians that claims being raped by Swedish men is worse than being raped by muslims.

It's the people that defend muslim "refugees" who rape 10yo boys because they had a "sexual emergency".

It's the people who demand the media de-muslim/de-refugee media articles, like the Paris McDonald's killer story.

So anyone who disagrees with you?

Again, you are being too simplistic about it, which is typical for SJWs.

Vocal Minority? To be honest, the only time I EVER hear about SJWs is when other people on the internet complain about them.

I'm betting you don't notice them because they fit into your echo chamber and confirmation biases.

These people are everywhere.  They are on TV (you can find a lot of the stuff copied to YouTube), they are all over mass media.

SJWs routinely make it into mass media because they false flag themselves.  As it turns out, none of the rapes that made international news in the last 20 years was real.  The same goes for pro Trump violence.    But as the SJW campaign tells us; JUST BELIEVE.

@viscous:

raphjd, as an esteemed moderator on this site, I'm sure you know the Washington Times is an outlet of the Christian crackpot Sung Yung Moon's Unification Church. Maybe you should be a little more discerning / take a little more care before citing some homophobic crackpot? Or you could always join the Unification Church – I'm sure some lovely gal is just waiting to be mass-married to you!

Are you trying to deny that this "event" took place?

Hopefully you'll trust a jew (David Packman, I like him BTW) reporting on the event; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i_g9uIHCAZs

Of course there's plenty of other videos about this white-hating racist event; Fox News, Bill Maher and many others.

The videos of the event are out there.  You can just watch the event itself and see what is said and done.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/oct/24/berkeley-protesters-form-human-chain-stop-white-st/

++++

This the kind of crap that created the backlash against the left and identity politics.

There are countless examples of this kind of thing.

@Loki100:

@raphjd:

AGAIN, if you people really think what you are doing is so good, then why do you need to hide your faces?!   Why do you need to assault the media who is covering what you are doing in a public space?!

And this is the perfect example of exactly what I was talking about (in fact, I noticed it earlier, but felt the sheer hypocrisy of someone in the LGBT community being anti-rioting was more important to point out). Literally no one was talking about this. You brought it up out of no where, it doesn't apply to anyone here (nor to the conversation). You don't even proffer a context to make sense of it. Just an accusation hurled around, because you picked it up in the comments section on a right-wing website.

This is textbook troll behavior.

@raphjd:

Stonewall was completely different from an election.   And as you seem to ignore, the Stonewall rioters didn't cover their faces.  Nor did they use "injustice" as a reason to loot.

Wow. You really are ignorant.

Just because you weren't talking about it doesn't mean it can't be talked about or that it has no relavence on this topic.

It does fit here because they are SJWs just like you.  You guys claim you are the good guys yet you need to cover your faces, while looting in the name of injustice.

There are countless videos on the internet to show exactly what I'm talking about.

If you want to talk about "ignorance", then we need to talk about SJWs who can't provide any evidence to support their claims and just name call or physically abuse people, like pouring a bottle of piss on a reporter's head and then running away.