Second, this law also applies to religious-based agencies that get state funding. It would also let agencies discriminate against Jews and Muslims, for that matter, as well as LGBT people.
It would allow jewish and muslim agencies to turn away those they don't like too. So no discrimination there.
Sharia law is against gays and women, despite what SJWs tell you.
I'm still waiting for Higgs to come back and tell me all the muslim countries that are gay utopias. He ran away from the thread after I asked him to name them.
Private property doesn't have the same rules.
If that preacher was standing on the sidewalk, then he has every right to do it.
If he followed the couple, then that is harassment, which is illegal.
And for God's sake- learn to reign in your temper or at least stop going off into calling people names. It's what got you warned. Not your opinion- your conduct. Peace!
Correct.
BAMN is also a "progressive" group that advocates for violence. They also advocate for selectively banning free speech.
No one has asked anyone here to apologize for the violence that someone else did.
All that has been asked is that liberals condemn the violence.
Violence is almost always wrong, especially when it's used to prevent the human rights of others, such as free speech.
In the pigeon sized brains of the libtards.. Trump can do no right.
It doesn't matter what the topic is, they have a pathological need to villianize Trump.
Fake news, it's on youtube.
Oh wait, that only applies when conservatives mention youtube.
Lots of right wing groups have routinely called out and protested at speaking events of left leaning people. The heritage foundation even pays people to do it. The focus on the family organization has events scheduled in advance to protest speakers that they don't agree with and they and others like to gang up and try and force speakers down.
It pretty much the same from both sides, unfortunately. Look at many of Hillary Clintons campaign stops. She had people try and disrupt as much as Trump did, probably more.
BLM stopped Bernie rallies, not conservatives.
BLM hijacked the the Orlando vigil, not conservatives.
BLM hijacked countless PRIDE events, not conservatives.
You called someone a "dumb bitch". That is why you got warned.
But you are at odds with your fellow liberals.
You and Brian are the only 2 to condemn the violence by liberals and look at how your fellow liberals treat you. They view as a traitor because you disagreed with them on a single topic. It reminds me of C.S. Lewis saying the worst thing a christian can do is disagree with another christian in front of a non christian.
You and Brian committed treason in the eyes of your fellow liberals. I can tell you that no conservative down voted you when you guys condemned the violence. It was all your fellow liberals. I'm also seeing your fellow liberals down voting your comments without reading them. If they are reading them, they ignore your pro liberal stance.
American "heroes" were treasonous as well. Let's take down every picture and statue of them.
Dude, just go get some penis enlargement pills or something. I don't even believe it's as small as you think.
:police: Careful :police:
Contracts can and are deemed unlawful by courts all the time.
You can not have a contract to be killed and eaten, as an example.
Like your complaint about a marriage certificate, you can only make a contract that allows you to do what is legal.
So, basically you want marriages to only be recognized if they are between a man and woman? There are very specific guarantees awarded to people who are in a recognized marriage, such as not being forced to testify against your spouse. If gay marriages aren't recognized by the state, then a man would be forced to testify against his husband in a trial or a woman would be forced to testify against her wife. The argument you're making is nowhere near as deep as you're trying to make it sound. You basically do not want gay marriages to be recognized as "legitimate" marriages. It's great that gays were able to get "married" prior to the SCOTUS ruling in 2015; however, those marriages weren't recognized as "legitimate" marriages and the spouses weren't really spouses because they had absolutely none of the rights that "legitimate" spouses were given. There was a woman (forgot her name) who was "married" to another woman prior to the SCOTUS ruling and her wife got seriously ill and she was banned from making any medical decisions for her wife all because their marriage wasn't recognized as a legitimate marriage by their state. Why should it be fair for a man and woman's marriage to be recognized as legitimate but not two married men or two married women?
Not the case at all. What I am saying is that the government has no say in what is a "legitimate marriage," because marriage is a religious institution. What people do not understand is that they can have a contract where you are the caretaker in case of tragic things like this, but the problem is that no one understands the law. Don't try to make me look bad just because of your ignorance of the law.
Actually, if you research it, marriage was a state thing before a religious thing.
While you can do legal documents that give another person SOME legal aspects over your life, like in marriage, you still do not get any of the right granted solely by the stats such as Marital Confidentiality.
Also, you need several documents for the various aspects, OR you only need the marriage certificate.
Any "pride" associated with the flag is by default, pride in white supremacy, given the social and historic associations with the flag, whether it's supports are willing to admit it or not.
My dad belonged to a motorcycle club when we lived in North Carolina. It was mixed race since most of the people were military. The "rebel flag" was part of their "colors".
The only thing these people were into was motorcycles and helping people.
Is that rule of no XXX pics still valid?
NO.
Just Curious, Can we post pics of ourselves with Porn stars we have met taken with our own camera?
YES, you can.
As it's a "selfie", you own the rights to it.
Only commercially produced photos are banned.
We all know that politics can get heated, so there is some leeway in the general rule regarding "polite disagreement".
Popping into a thread for the sole purpose to flame, is a NO NO.
Popping into a thread for the sole purpose to complain that the thread exists, is a NO NO.
Popping into a thread to complain that the POLITICS section exists, is a NO NO.
Making false reports about staff or another user, is a NO NO. If you claim that someone called you a "faggot nigger", you had better have proof. Remember, I can see the original posts and edited posts.
If you routinely post nothing but childish comments that do nothing to further the discussion, that is a NO NO.
If you can't or won't further the discussion, then ignore this section.
If you want to call your "enemy" a cunt or the like, take it elsewhere.
Don't be petty. A disagreement here should not mean that you refuse to fulfill a re-seed request. Nor should it mean you get into a flame fest in the cooking section.
NEITHER SIDE IS EXEMPT FROM THE RULES.
Don't expect me to see every offending post, use the report button.
My boy (not in a racist way, you race baiters) Terrence Williams preachin' some truth;
https://www.facebook.com/terrencewilliams.truizms/videos/10207685027158602/
YEP.
The leftist media hyped up the stories, then totally ignored them when they proved to be lies.
SHOCKINGLY, TYT was the only leftist "news" outlet to condemn the false flagging. Their point was the same that I have been using for years, that false flags always hurt real victims of those crimes. Fake rape claims do nothing but hurt real victims of rape, etc, etc, etc…........