Posts made by raphjd

You really need to research the history of voting rights for both men and women in the west.  It's not exactly what the feminists want you to believe.

If you look at the history of the draft in west, you will see that it was the mother of feminism, Emmeline Pankhurst and her lot, that we have to thank for that.    We have the same nasty bitches to thank for the White Feather campaign.

Susan B Anthony was a massive man hater and racist.

Feminism/Suffragetism was born of extremely nasty, man hating, racist, elitists.  They didn't want everyone to vote.  They only cared about people in their socio-economic class being able to vote.

Feminists are sheep to their religion.  They only know what their leaders tell them.  AND, just like any religion, those outside it tend to know more about than it's worshipers.

Non-discrimination on the basis of gender identity and expression may very well be interpreted by the courts in the future to include the right to be identified by a person’s self identified pronoun.  The Ontario Human Rights Commission, for example, in their Policy on Preventing Discrimination Because of Gender Identity and Expression states that gender harassment should include “ Refusing to refer to a person by their self-identified name and proper personal pronoun”.  In other words, pronoun misuse may become actionable, though the Human Rights Tribunals and courts.  And the remedies?  Monetary damages, non-financial remedies (for example, ceasing the discriminatory practice or reinstatement to job) and public interest remedies (for example, changing hiring practices or developing non-discriminatory policies and procedures).  Jail time is not one of them.

Well, there you go.

As I pointed out to another member, jail time isn't required for something to be illegal.

Also, could you have found a more biased article?      It's like a feminist article written by a university's feminist theory department.

This thread is not specifically about C-16, as the title shows.    It's about SJWs.

I have talked about the UK in other threads.  One example is how the police, government and media conspired to allow 1,400+ young girls get raped by a group of muslim men, so they wouldn't seem racist.

Black Lives Matter is based on lies and purposely, misleading stats.  It's about dead criminals and not dead 9yo girls killed in a drive by while doing her homework.

Take Back The Night is similar to BLM.  If you go back and research it, you'll find losts of problems with it.  One of the problems is girls using it for celebrity, like the one that falsely claimed she was raped and even named the guy.  She destroyed his life for 4 years before admitting she lied, she only admitted she lied because he went on to sue her.

Just Believe is why society has destroyed the lives and property of many man, especially on college campuses.

Your point about where I get my news shows you only get yours from your SJW echo chamber, while mine is quite broad.  Like the BBC, the CBC is quite left leaning.

Are you saying the story isn't real because I didn't link to Clinton News Network, TYT or MTV Decoded?  Besides, it was the first site I found because I didn't know the girl's name.  I just remembered it was near Houston.

I noticed you didn't comment on the story at all.  Why is that?

http://www.dailywire.com/news/4412/girl-uses-boys-bathroom-bad-things-happen-next-amanda-prestigiacomo

If you don't like that news source, there's enough info so you can find it on SJW news sources.

EDIT:

If you look a bit harder, you'll find that Elliot is raising money for male hormones.    Not quite the "non binary" claimed.    I smell a rat on the original story.

Like I said before have you read Bill C-16 and second I don't get my news info from YouTube (are you serious) and if you do then all I can say is good luck with that!

So, you are say that there is no news on YouTube.    You really don't know what you are talking about.  YouTube is more than just prank videos and whatnot.

YouTube has debates on all sorts of topics that normally you only get to see if you are there in person.  There are even debates on C-16.

YouTube also has actual news broadcasts archived.

What part of C-16 are you wanting me to RE-READ?

AGAIN, no one has any problem with the transsexual protections.  The problem is the gender trenders and gender terrorists.

I'm talking about that blonde high school GIRL, that claims to be pan-gender so she needs to use the boys bathroom, even though she only dresses as a girl, acts like a girl and looks like a girl.  She also claims to be a gay heterosexual, in other words, she likes boys.

There are countless examples of these people.

NO!!!

You'd be a slut if you only did sex to the exclusion of other things.

All the studies show that sleeping naked is best, since you can regulate your body temp by covering/uncovering while you sleep.

That being said, I always sleep with underwear (boxer-briefs or boxers) on and sometimes a t-shirt.

Lily Allen is as useless as Trump.

I think you are being dishonest about C-16.

While I agree that it has protections for transsexuals, it also has "protections" for gender trenders and gender terrorists.  I haven't seen anyone who's against the bit about protecting transsexuals.

You should search YouTube for the various discussions and debates over this.

Both.

As long as there are exclusive games, then you will need/want both.

Both have their good and bad, as far as hardware and software.  Not being a dainty little girl, I love the larger size controller of the Xbox, as an example.

How long did it take for the Canadian news to talk about this story?  The story broke Tuesday evening/night on Fox News, even on Wednesday the liberal media outlets still hadn't reported on it.

The 1st person to talk about this from the White House was the Assistant Press Secretary and that was at least the next day.

AGREED on the part about the people who watched it and did nothing,

I can appreciate a beautiful woman, but I have no desire to have sex with them.

"The victim was called racial epithets such as “watermelon”, “chicken-eater”, and “nigger”, and Howard taunted the victim with a “Ku Klux Klan” song, the lawsuit alleged."

Yep. No Hate crime. Sure.

It's a lawsuit, not a criminal case.    It's easy to make claims in a lawsuit, especially when there is no independent witnesses.

I want a link to where Don Lemon says its not a hate crime and Symone Sanders saying it's not a hate crime.

Youtube Video

Don Lemon will immediately jump on a Hillary supporter claiming to be a victim, and scream they are victims of hate crimes.  Yet he won't do it here.

You can interpret press briefings however way you want. I want a quote.

Watch the original Chicago PD press conference for this case.

Citation needed for what exactly?

Chicago PD was desperate NOT to class this as a hate crime.  For evidence of that, go back and watch the videos of the press conferences they gave.

Don Lemon and Symone Sanders are the SJW media darlings.  Hell, we even have blacks here on this site claiming that blacks can't be racist and whatnot.

You are right, there are decent black people that admit that blacks can be racist and commit hate crimes.

Youtube Video

"Some Black Guy" did a response to this.

There are countless videos about it.

Youtube Video

Terrence Williams responded to this story.

https://www.queerty.com/stefano-gabbana-steps-dont-call-gay-im-man-20170106

Here's what he said;

“Don’t call me gay please!! Im a man!!! Who I love its my private life!!! [sic]” he wrote.

@alibix:

Very glad that the justice system in America worked this time. Despicable people. This is a hate crime done and dusted, everyone said it would be and it was. The criminals have been prosecuted.

As a black person, it's hard not to notice the general difference when stories like this:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/20/idaho-football-coat-hanger-rape-teammate-john-rk-howard
Aren't covered at nearly the same amount - and the criminals here weren't charged of a hate crime and haven't been giving any jail time yet to my knowledge. Maybe this situation will allow more light to be shed on this recent issue too.

Well, the head of Chicago PD was desperate not to class the latest attack as a hate crime.    Don Lemon and Symone Sanders have been adamant that it wasn't a hate crime since they are black.  You know, blacks can't commit hate crimes.

The football player case is tough because we don't know if it was a hate crime or not.  It's definiately a sex crime, but I'm unsure of the motive.  Maybe it was revenge for the victim snitching that the criminal was smoking behind the equalipment locker.  No hate crime there.

LOL, such historionics.

I gave you facts about the case that apparently you are too blinded by racist conspiracy theories to see.

You are using the death of those people to shut down the conversation, to further your racist worldview.

Who gives a fuck if it's the state or the feds that prosecute racists?!  As long as the cunt(s) are punished, all's good.