Posts made by raphjd

Oh, okay. Whatever. Where's an irrationality trophy when you need one? You sir should be deemed "Irrational Man of the Year."

LOL.  You are just a sad little person.

And why should I care what a person like you thinks about anything?

@royalcrown89:

Funny how you mentioned me in this response when I've been called personal names on here by other users such as when user amicusets called me a "flaming queen of libtards" in the thread related to Racist Elf (aka Jeff Sessions) and absolutely nothing was done about it. And while I did admit I should not have used the language I did in the rant you mentioned, the rant itself was 100% justified. The basis of all my arguments are that everyone should have the very basic opportunities and I do not have a belief that one person's rights or even their very own lives are worth less or more than others. Your arguments on the other hand can be paraphrased as, "all women believe men should die; therefore, feminism is toxic" or "all blacks are racists unless they're completely identical to the one type of black I agree with; therefore, only blacks I agree with deserve to be treated as human beings." I will continue to deem 95-98% of your arguments as wholly irrational. The other 2-5% depend on you saying things that are undeniable facts, such as the American immigration system being unfair to people like you and your partner.

Did you use the report button?

LOL, you can't even get your lies even partly believable.

I do believe that feminism is toxic and I've given countless examples of your religion being vile, but I never said all women.

Nor did I say all blacks are racist.  I said that blacks, like you, who view everything as being about race, are racist.    You pulled the "but blacks can't be racist" BS.  I point out that a certain Congressman lied and that makes me a racist who hates MLK,Jr by some twisted black racist imagination.

I voted for a black woman as my Congressperson in the last 12 elections and that somehow makes me a racist and a woman hater.  Fucking hell, you do have a fucked up mentality.

I didn't say that ALL tax money.  I said of tax money that goes to social and medical issues.    The majority of it goes to women.  Men get treated like shit because women are oppressed.  Look at the government spending on the big 3 cancers; lung, breast and prostate.  By the numbers AFFECTED; 1. lung, 2. prostate and 3. breast.  HOWEVER, government spending would suggest that breast cancer is by far the most important one and prostate cancer is the least important by a long ways.  There is virtually no funding for men's social issues, but endless cash for women's social issues.  The UK defunded ALL male charities starting the current tax year; 2016/17, but only gave women's charities a 5% cut.

You already admitted that feminists are selfish cunts who only care about themselves and don't give a damned about men.  Yeah, I know, there's this mythical "academic feminism" that's supposedly perfection beyond any god.  Feminists do nothing for men, but get extremely butt hurt when men try getting their own equality.  Feminists pull fire alarms to prevent talks on male specific health issues.  They nearly riot to prevent a male suicide lecture.  Feminists invent "man-spreading", despite their own guilt on the topic, while women are stoned to death in the middle east.

BULLSHIT, "patriarchy" blames men and "bad" women.  It's in the name.  We also have "man-spreading", "man-splaining", "man-slamming" and others.  Yeah, you're right.  It's not about blaming men.  Give me a break.

You really need to stop cucking for over privileged western women who need to make up oppression so they can claim to be persecuted by everything.

If I have a chip on my shoulder, then you have a severe case of self loathing.

HAH.  You are just another feminist cuck trying desperately to convince me that western women are oppressed when they clearly aren't.

You remind me of that feminist cuck in Portland a short while back.  His, female friend decided to hit a guy because he didn't respect their protest.  He was trying to get to work, FFS.  After being hit a few times, the guy hit her back.  Suddenly gender equality went out the window and it was all about "you can't hit a women".  I'm sorry, but I would have hit back after the 1st time she hit me.

Trump's Aberdeen Scotland golf course was built on an important chunk of land for bird migration.

There are a lot of things Presidents aren't legally allowed to do but they still do it; Iran - Contra for example.

How sad.  You think you are being "trolled" because someone doesn't believe you are a conservative based on your posts.

The picture was/is there and apparently you saw the link, so I'm confused why you kept claiming it didn't exist.

It's completely obvious you only enforce the rules when people are saying things you personally don't want to read.

LOL, do you realize how many people I would have to ban if I didn't allow people to disagree with me.

As an example, RoyalCrown would be muted on the forums because of a little rant he went on, which even he admits he violated the rules.  He got no punishment because he admitted he did wrong.

The only people who get "banned", actually muted on the forums, are those that only post personal attacks, while never joining in on the discussion.  And spammers, of course.

One person got a total site ban because he fought with so many people and not a single staff member wanted him around.

You seriously don't see that giant picture in this thread?  You need to check your settings.    Look for the post dated 6 March @ 19:32.

WIRETAPPED DATA USED IN INQUIRY OF TRUMP AIDES; is what the newspaper headline is for the story the day after the internet article is dated.

If you could see the picture, you'd know the article headline isn't the same as the internet article headline even though they both seem to be the same story.

The article says it's unclear how much of the data and investigation is about Trump and his campaign.

If the article was about Hillary's associates, then you would be screaming for blood.  You'd be claiming it was about getting at her.

Why are you fixated on the articles Michael S Schmidt did for the Wall Street Journal?

I said the articles he did for the NY Times.  Look at the picture of the NY Times cover posted in this thread.  Jan 20, 2017 and the first name in the by line is Michael S Schmidt.

Women can have sex with boys, then force the boy to pay child support.

Mary K Latourneau fucked a 12yo and only spent 3 months in prison the 1st time.  PUSSY PASS!!!!!

She gets out of jail and fucks him some more and only get's the suspended 6 years from her first conviction.  PUSSY PASS!!!!!!

Jackie of UVA fame didn't get prosecuted.  PUSSY PASS!!!!!

Crystal from DUKE LaCrosse didn't get prosecuted.  Pussy Pass!!!!

Crystal only went to prison for the murder of her boyfriend.  Despite the evidence, she got pussy passed with 2nd degree murder.

The PUSSY PASS is real and it's an official part of the UK judges' rule book, despite all the laws about gender equality.

Did you look at that picture of the NY Times front page?

Michael S Schmidt co-wrote that article, which was published on Jan 20, 2017.

Michael S Schmidt wrote the article criticizing Trump for claiming he was being wiretapped with no evidence.

In which article was MSS being totally dishonest?

Other than man-spreading and the like, what problems do women in the west face that are gender specific?

I'm sure it must be absolute fucking hellish for women to get the vast majority of tax money for their social and medical issues.

NOPE, the entire west sucks to be a man.  Except in Sweden, women have AA which helps them get into college, even though they make up 60+% of college students.  Not to mention that 40 years ago we feminized the education system to help women do better, despite knowing it would harm the education of boys.

Yeah, it was quite obvious on The Weakest Link.  Women would oust the men regardless, while men ousted the ones that would help them more.

PATRIARCHY!!!!!!!!!    Blame everything on penis.  Men do bad things it's because they are men.  Women do bad things it's because men exist.    Yea, yeah.  I've heard all this bullshit before.

Really?  Using an article from Time that uses another article from Time as a source?

Every part of your post is massively warped…

Obama lied about mass surveillance to get elected.  TRUTH

Obama got butt hurt at Snowden over letting the cat out of the bag.  TRUTH

The FBI hasn't always been honest.  TRUTH

Dude, it was fake news… Give me a break man ...

Do your research.  Michael S Schmidt wrote both articles in the NY Times.  You'll see his name in the picture posted above.

So who is guilty of fake news?

Trump tweeted what Michael S Schmidt wrote in one article, then Michael S Schmidt writes a 2nd article saying that Trump tweets lies about being wiretapped and has no proof it happened.

I don't like Trump, but this crap is pretty fucked up.

I wouldn't say it's "fake news" since we know that Obama lied to get elected and massively increased mass surveillance.

If Obama was so willing to lie about that, then wouldn't he be willing to lie about other things?

It's when you refer a person to signup to our site.

I forget all the specifics, but they can not just signup and just forget their account.  They have to actually use their account.

I think [don't quote me on this], that you get a fixed bonus and a bonus equal to their bonus for 6 months.

Also, illegal content.

On very rare occasions, it could be that the uploader asked to have it deleted because of a glitch that was caught after uploading.

It's based on the old "scene" l33t (elite) speak.  Coders, hackers, rippers, etc used this to separate themselves from the "l0s3rs" who just use computers.

Modern uses are mentioned in other posts.

@MrMazda:

As ironic as this sounds, did you know that you also accumulate SBP by contributing to the forums as well? With every new post and every new forum thread you earn SBP. Don't abuse this though, because the SBP can be retracted if our forum admin should find that the posts are solely for the purpose of acquiring these precious SBP.

You may get away with forum spamming once, but you will end up muted on the forums if you abuse this.

Also, as noted above, you will lose the points for any deleted thread/post.

Use the REPORT button to report spammers.  Don't use the Help Desk for this.

Regardless of the Trump story, let's not forget that Obama promised to end the mass surveillance if he was elected President.    Instead, he expanded it.

@chacha:

The public shaming of this woman needs to stop. Once I saw her speak on NBC i felt she was a little "off". People should just leave her alone.
I admit the story is interesting…

As long as she remains a media whore, then we have every right to keep talking about her.

@JupiterJazz:

Some of you guys are a bit clueless…..

1. Rachel D was exposed by her white parents.

2. Affirmative Action programs help white women more than people of color

3. The largest Affirmative Action program in the USA is the GI Bill... Which when it first was issued excluded Black People.

4. There are many studies that show there are still racial issues in the USA in many countries.

Not sure who you are directing that at, but no one said otherwise.

1. And, that means what?

2. That doesn't change the fact that AA sets different standards based on race to get into college.  I also mentioned that WOMEN get special treatment under AA in college admissions.

3. And that has to do with this thread how?  As a white guy, I get no benefit from AA.

4.  Sure.  As Morgan Freeman says, if you make everything about race, everything will be racial.  If you race bait every single issue (MTV Decoded and many others), especially with lies like HANDS UP, DON'T SHOOT, everything will be about race.  When you allow blacks to treat whites in a way that would not be tolerated if the races were reversed, then you are going to have racial problems.  When blacks (and liberal cucks) defend a BLM Toronto boss over tweet she made about killing men and whites, there will be racial issues.  When blacks (and liberal cucks) defend another BLM leader over creating fake Twitter accounts and tweeting anti-black racist messages, there's gonna racial problems.  If you want to scream BLACK LIVES MATTER every time a black criminal is killed, while sending death threats to that black grandmother who go angry over the murder of a 9yo girl doing her homework, people are gonna think your movement is a bunch of shit. If you are willing to prevent ambulances from getting through, you need a bullet in the head, because it shows that your "movement" is more important than people's lives.  If you are willing to be responsible for 43% of cop killings, then be thankful you make up only 26% of cop shootings.