Posts made by raphjd

Anti gay/lesbian is fading quickly from most conservatives as the older ones die off.    Most young conservatives don't view gays/lesbians as an issue.

In the UK, it was the Tories  (conservatives) who gave us total equality in marriage and related laws.  Labour (liberals) only gave us  business contract based "civil partnerships" and "somewhat similar" rights to marriage.

Trans and identity issues are the newest thing.  NYC, Canada and maybe others legally punishing people for "wrong speak" when it comes to personal pronouns and crap like that.  In NYC, a business can fined $125,000 for ACCIDENTALLY using the wrong personal pronouns and/or mis-gendering someone; each time.  It's $250,000 each time if it's deemed to be on purpose.  WTF?!  Imagine girly girl Elliot Cope walking into a shop in NYC and someone greets her a if she weren't male.  Everything about her is female, but she claims to be male.  She is a female, she presents as a female, but claims she's male.  She could kill a business with fines just because she's an attention seeker.

Real trans-sexuals aren't the problem/issue.  It's the gender trenders, gender terrorists and all the other ass clowns.

@Dene:

@raphjd:

:police:  Jumping into a thread for the sole purpose of attacking a person is not allowed.

The above has alway been the rule.   It adds no value to the thread.    :police:

And again, SJWs have no actual response to my comments, so they have to attack me personally.

***********response deleted prefer to stay unmuted lol

Since you reported me to me, I'll respond here.

Jumping into a thread just to flame is never allowed.

I have punished more people on "my side" than i have from "your side".    You would know that if you paid attention.

RoyalCrown should have been punished for a very clear rule violation, but he admitted he was wrong in how he said it, not what he said.  That's fine.

The 2 people from your side that have been punished were done so because they jumped into threads for the sole purpose to flame, not join in the discussions.  The 1st one to get muted is already unmuted.

There was a 3rd person your side who was given a total site ban, but that was about a lot of other things.    We got 50 to 100 complaints about him from users and staff per week.

@royalcrown89:

@skizzage:

Hurting the cuck's feelings. Poor lil cuck and his poor lil feelings. You throw words around like cuck and sjw using them as insults and then run to your cave when someone throws them back at you. Cliche. Stereotype. Boring.

Man, I really regret stumbling into the political forum in a gay porn torrent site.

I believe he's trying too hard to be right-wing. You can be gay and right-wing without completely losing your rationale. He has obviously lost his rationale and has gone off into a highly irrational tangent where you either hate yourself and agree 100% with him or you are a SJW. I actually empathized with him about one of his current situations because unlike him, I can show empathy towards someone even if I cannot relate to them politically, socially, economically, etc. I truly believe he does not know reality from fiction at this point.

How is screaming "racist" at me because I brought up 2 proven lies by a Congressman, "rational"?!    You could not see past race to rationally continue that discussion.

I'm not sure if you are a blatant liar or just completely delusional.  Hating feminism has nothing to do with hating women and equality.  I have shown countless reasons why I hate feminism, but instead of discussing those, you and your ilk scream "woman hater".

As an example, pointing out that feminists in the UK fought to prevent equalizing the state retirement age and making sex crime laws gender neutral, makes me a woman hater in your mind.    I want equality in the state retirement age and sex crime laws.

So who is the real irrational one?

You seriously need to go back and re-read that exchange, because you have no idea what was said.

I talked about a male feminist punching a woman who disagreed with feminism (and other things).   To which, you brought up domestic violence and men beating up women.

@raphjd, 95-98% of what you say is wholly irrational…you know the rest.

So says the person that screams "racism" any time a white person disagrees with black people, regardless of the topic.

You are delusional if you think if the election went the other way that your side wouldn't be saying "yeah but what if Trump won?".  We heard that kind of stuff while Obama was in office about republicans who ran against him and even GWB, who couldn't be President again because of term limits.

You are a typical partisan hack.  It's ok when your side does it, but the other side is never allowed to do it.

@Dene:

@raphjd:

@quangtran:

I used to laugh at people who were deemed "SJW" but quickly realized that the entire anti-SJW movement was co-opted by racists and alt-righters. They claim to be against modern feminism and BLM, but really they are just against women and black people. It has got to the point were anyone who uses the term "cuck" and "SJW" is likely a terrible human being.

The same can be said for your side.

Your side set a building on fire to prevent "wrong think".  You guys gloated that it was set on fire with people in it.

Your side says it's ok to beat the shit out of people even after they are laying, unconscious and bleeding in the street.

It's your side that says "just believe" and to throw men in prison for rape solely on a woman's say so.

It's your side that did $15,000 worth of damage to a frat house based on a complete lie and non of you said sorry or helped pay for the damage.

It's your side that thinks it's ok to set a girl's hair on fire because she doesn't agree with you.

It's ok to pour a bottle of piss on a reporter's head because she asked questions you didn't have answers for.

It's ok for a man to hit a woman for disagreeing with feminism.

It's ok to false flag at every turn to create "hate crimes" that never happened.

Yeah, who's really the bad side?

"It's ok for a man to hit a woman for disagreeing with feminism.   "

no.. but the domestic violence that occurs on a daily basis, where men are hurting women is ok? you ok with that? Because it sounds like to me you are pointing to 1 off or minority things, that are bad but are done by silly extremists.. i'm sorry but both sides have stories like this they could tell all day

e.g.

"It's ok to false flag at every turn to create "hate crimes" that never happened"

but what of the vast majority that DID happen? Are they ok? no, they are not. Who did those ? Who knows?

look at both sides - there are extreme 1 off things on both sides..

That is your full reply (post #47 in this thread).

Please be kind enough to show me where I misquoted you.

That post shows that you gendered domestic violence.  You did not say "spouses".

:police:  Jumping into a thread for the sole purpose of attacking a person is not allowed.

The above has alway been the rule.  It adds no value to the thread.    :police:

And again, SJWs have no actual response to my comments, so they have to attack me personally.

@skizzage:

You sound like a god damn child throwing around the word cuck. Holy shit. Who's really the cuck around here? It's you. You're the cuck. The absolutely unoriginal and cliche of a stereotype of a cuck, snagging your arguments and insults from the cuckiest of all cucks. "Don't wanna be called a cuck then stop being a cuck" Fuck you sound stupid and any possible credibility you could have had is just washed away down the cuck sewer. Just a poorly aggressive internet tough guy. And now my phone knows the word "cuck" and I'm so upset with you for that. Yeah

:police:  Posting just to do personal attacks is not allowed.  :police:

That said, you showed you have absolutely nothing to rebut my arguments, so you resort to name calling.  It's typical with SJWs.

It's your side that keeps the "not our president" and "yeah, but if Hillary won" crap going.

There are still teachers/professors calling the election an act of terrorism/violence on the people of the US.

You guys are just as bad as the Tea Party wanting the country to fail to prove Obama was bad.

@moonmonday:

Frankly the OP here is a blatant idiot.

Police are not friends. Period. If you know even one iota of gay history, you know that. There's that uniform fetish, kinky dress-up, but that's not real life. Grow up.

Also, pretty much anyone using the word 'cuck' clearly has no idea what it means or what the term 'cuckold' means. Stop trying to make it happen. You just sound as stupid as you present yourself as being with this statement. Maybe that's good though, because it gives people a handy warning to tune out; whatever else someone is saying who uses that word probably isn't worth listening to.

I'll ignore the personal attacks, even though that's pretty much all you have.

I love your absolute hatred of the police, even the ones that had nothing to do with your "complaint".

As for your complaining about the word "cuck", get over yourself.  If you don't like being called a cuck, then don't be one.

no.. but the domestic violence that occurs on a daily basis, where men are hurting women is ok?

That is what you said in response to my point, which had nothing to do with domestic violence.  This brings up 2 lies, yours and RoyalCrown's.

You gendered domestic violence, not me.  You didn't say "spouses".  Keep your facts straight.

You brought domestic violence into this thread, not me.  That's RC's lie.

Feminist "facts" aren't the same as real facts.

++++

Do you really believe that there are only 298 false flags by your side?  Really?!

I do love how you played the "pouring piss on a woman reporter's head is nothing compared to gays being murdered in the streets daily" rubbish.  A bunch of the major media cases have proven to be hoaxes.

The above is how you excused away the sins of your side.  "Yeah, well, whatever" is all you can say.

I'm starting to think you are Don Lemon and Simone Sanders rolled into one, the way you brush off the points I made.

@royalcrown89:

The overwhelming majority of raphjd's opinions are wholly irrational based on wild generalizations. He uses the same exact examples to back up many different arguments, such as some situation where black students made white students walk through a creek or something and BLM protesters interrupting a Bernie Sanders rally. He uses very, very rare instances to generalize whole populations of people; hence, why I consider 95-98% of what he says to be wholly irrational. That's basically the best response you can give to him on here because once you try to bring rationality into the argument, he deflects. He's often deflected to arguments that have absolutely nothing to do with the topic, which is why this thread (that he started by the way) was about the Pepsi ad and you're now arguing about domestic violence, feminism (he hates women with a passion), and gay bashing. I just use the typical 95-98% irrationality statement with him because it's basically the only response you can give to almost anything he says. Very rarely he'll make sense, but most of the time it's like trying to have a discussion with a real life Archie Bunker minus the occasional sympathy.

LOl, so says the person that screams RACISM any time a white person disagree with black people no matter the topic.  You are just another anti-white racist who is guilty of the dictionary fallacy, so you can claim that you can't be a racist.

I pointed out 2 proven lies by a Congressman, so I am racist in your eyes.    His being a liar has nothing to do with me or racism.

You are a liar and you know it.    I hate  feminism, not women and equality.    I have pointed out a countless examples of ways feminists fight against equality.  The only thing people like you have to refute my points is "you're irrational".  People like you have your religion, but haven't actually read your bible so you are clueless to the facts.

As for the topic shift, go back and read the thread, without your usual white hating racist lenses, and see that it shifted by itself.

How am I enabling domestic violence?!

Telling you to do your research DOES NOT enable domestic violence.    You making domestic violence a gendered issue is what enables women to abuse their partners; male or female.    This shows everyone that you are a self loathing feminist/vaginalist cuck.  70% of one sided domestic violence is by women, not men.

I fucking hate domestic violence with a passion.  How fucking dare you tell me I enable it by telling you to look at the facts.

++++

There's a long list of false flag hate crimes, even before trump.

In Charlotte, we had a White Supremacy hate crime incident.  Oh wait, it was a black guy who did the hate crime.

We had 2 cases of head scarf hate crimes, but they turned out to be lies by the girls.

We had the muslim woman whose car was grafittied.  Oh wait, she did that herself and was caught on CCTV.

It was a black member of the church that set it on fire.

Let's not forget all the rape cases.

Tawana Brawley and her mother was 30 years ago and fake hate crimes, for whatever purpose, have exploded.

Here's a site that lists 298 fake hate crimes in the US, but they admit it's no where near all of them;  http://www.fakehatecrimes.org  In fact, #298 is the Charlotte case mentioned above.

I was the victim of a hate crime 25 years ago.  These scum that you are excusing makes a mockery of what I and other real victims went through.

Actually do your research on domestic violence.  From your response, you're in for a big shock.  Don't just look to your gender studies aka feminist indoctrination professor to tell you the stats.

Your previous post shows that you chose a side, that of the SJWs, by only attacking the side you labeled "evil".

Just like with my recent discussion about feminsm, you guys ignore the crap your side is doing and crying about mythical things to defend your position.  At least the guy in that discussion admitted that feminists are selfish cunts, even though he quickly back peddled.

A lot of the gay bashing that's made headline news seems to have been false flags, just like countless others.  Even the SJW main news outlet TYT says false flagging is always wrong, but then they go on to defend the false flaggers.

Cank from TYT is a "just believer", but he's an Armenian genocide denier because it makes his people look bad.

@quangtran:

I used to laugh at people who were deemed "SJW" but quickly realized that the entire anti-SJW movement was co-opted by racists and alt-righters. They claim to be against modern feminism and BLM, but really they are just against women and black people. It has got to the point were anyone who uses the term "cuck" and "SJW" is likely a terrible human being.

The same can be said for your side.

Your side set a building on fire to prevent "wrong think".  You guys gloated that it was set on fire with people in it.

Your side says it's ok to beat the shit out of people even after they are laying, unconscious and bleeding in the street.

It's your side that says "just believe" and to throw men in prison for rape solely on a woman's say so.

It's your side that did $15,000 worth of damage to a frat house based on a complete lie and non of you said sorry or helped pay for the damage.

It's your side that thinks it's ok to set a girl's hair on fire because she doesn't agree with you.

It's ok to pour a bottle of piss on a reporter's head because she asked questions you didn't have answers for.

It's ok for a man to hit a woman for disagreeing with feminism.

It's ok to false flag at every turn to create "hate crimes" that never happened.

Yeah, who's really the bad side?

None of my black friends like BLM.    They freak out whenever people assume that because they are black that they agree with BLM.

I agree that it is racist to think that blacks automatically support BLM.

If we aren't all part of the gay borg collective, then we deemed evil by our fellow fags.

I don't cuck to BLM, so I'm a racist.

I don't cuck to feminism, so I hate women.

I pointed out 2 proven lies by a Congressman, so I'm a racist.

It's always the same shit with SJWs.

If you disagree with setting a building on fire with people in it to prevent "wrong think", then you are a hate monger.

If you disagree with beating the shit out of people who you "think" might disagree with the fag collective, then you are evil.

If you claim that wearing boys' underwear doesn't make you trans, then you are evil.

If you don't believe a woman is gender fluid because she occasionally wears jeans, then you are evil.

If you say that being a cross dresser does not make you transsexual, you are a transphobe.

Saying that Elliot Cope isn't trans because she is not, makes you a transphobe.

Modern SJWs don't fight for anything real, they just want something to whine about to make them feel special.

Let's not for get how SJWs, especially black SJWs, treat blacks who disagree with their bullshit.   Non-SJW blacks are called white washed, coons, house niggers, chimps, and many other things.

@sybarite:

What are you, ten years old? Wow, how terrible, a stupid ad got pulled because it implied Pepsi could fix the long-standing racial disparities that remain in America. A gay man babbling about SJWs is just the saddest thing I've ever seen – many of us are only alive today because WE ARE SOCIAL JUSTICE WARRIORS, and when discrimination and the AIDS epidemic hit back, we didn't sit around pissing our pants and whining about 'cucks', we fought back.

You proved me right, most gays demand a hive mind.

Modern SJWs are fighting for bullshit, not justified causes.  It's like the recent discussion I had here with another user about feminism.  He had no idea about anything, just the misinformation he was told by feminists.   He clearly never looked up anything for himself, because anything I brought up he could only respond with "I haven't hear about that" or similar.   Everything was justified by screaming "the patriarchy".

BLM doesn't care about innocent black lives, they only care about thugs.   They too refuse to admit that blacks play an integral part in the issue they are complaining about.  When you compare crime stats against police shootings, blacks are actually shot far less than you would expect.  BLM screams that official stats are racist.

Nobody seriously thought/thinks that Pepsi can solve the world's ills.   BLM just needed another thing to whine about.

Let's forget that the ad has Kendall Jenner (wish that whole lot would go away).

SJWs, especially BLM, lost their shit because they claim that the new Pepsi ad is too police friendly.

SJWs win.

Pepsi pulls the ad and apologizes to BLM.

Fucking hell, humanity deserves to be wiped out.

BTW, I'm surprised feminists aren't claiming they are the ones who actually won since feminism cures all ills.

:police:  Please tone down the language.  You can disagree without being utterly rude.  :police: