Yet another example of systematic and institutionalized oppression of whites. That's the definition of racism according to leftists.
If whites pulled this kind of shit, there's be a lot of arrests, not the police being told to stand down. That show black privilege.
Both were bad.
Besides, Obama isn't the President anymore, so stop fucking talking about him. As a liberal, you should know your own dogma. "No talkie talkie about Obama."
Stop talking about Obama? Well you see, No.
I'll keep talking about him as he was one of the greatest presidents this sad mess of a country has had in a long time.At least he wasn't trying to ruin the country for anyone that isn't a rich, white, religious (but only christian), heterosexual, republican, unlike #45 and his cabinets of trolls.
As I've said countless times, we can only talk about Obama if it fits the liberal narrative, otherwise we can't mention him.
Please stop using "tard".
I'm sure you can find another descriptive name for the other side.
Small Correction, i believe it is one attack with two separate incidents.
Correct.
1 attack with 2 parts
Umm, you are still ignoring that he supported Bernie and Jill Stein.
AND YET AGAIN, feminist cucks down vote my posts about feminism, but can't refute them.
In the UK under Labour (liberals) they told gay refugees to stop being gay and sent them back.
(((Deflection))) Avoid talking about an issue by bringing up another issue.
NOPE.
Just because it makes liberals look like hypocrites, doesn't mean it's deflection.
We're talking; apples vs apples here.
It's like how liberals get butt hurt when Obama is brought up, unless it suits your narrative.
In India, in 2012/13, feminists fought and won to prevent women from being LEGALLY able to commit sex crimes and domestic violence.
Israel had something similar in about 2010.
UN Women (no such thing as UN Men) says that equality oppresses women.
So much for free speech, Welcome to Putin's América.
It's funny how you are blaming Trump/Putin, when it's your side that set a building on fire with people in it to prevent "wrong speak". It's your side that set a girl's hair on fire for wearing a Trump hat. It's your side that attacks a retired couple who was walking their their dog because they look like someone who would support free speech.
The list is long on liberals getting violent because they don't like free speech.
Actually, YouTube has plenty of excellent videos on countless topics.
Without YouTube, we wouldn't have the raw footage of Mouldylocks and the fight. Liberal media spun her to be a total victim and ignored her FB page and countless other bits of info that showed she was no victim, but an instigator.
We also got to see how 4Chan proved the guy with the bike lock was Eric Canton.
We also get to see the lunacy of liberals. I love the Tucker Carlson interviews.
We should reject this deal because it's not in our interests. Period. It does nothing to curb the two biggest polluters on Earth today: India & China. They've only agreed to cap how much more pollution they'll emit, but they continue increasing the amounts yearly under the agreement despite the fact China is so polluted you can't even see China from space.
You know, according to liberals, that makes you a racist.
Only whitey can do anything wrong.
In the UK, feminists are still fighting to prevent EQUALIZING the retirement age. They have also fought 3 times since 2003 to prevent making sex crimes gender neutral.
The "bench book" aka the official judges rule book tells judges to be extremely lenient toward women in all areas of court proceedings, but especially in sentencing. Where is the feminist campaign to end this special right for women?
We hear about the bad feminists and the "good" feminists. But I say that, with very few exceptions, there is no such thing as a good feminist. We only have feminists and do nothing sofa feminists, with very few exceptions as before.
NOW and many other feminist groups actively fight against shared parenting laws. So who are the real bitches; Chanty Binz et al who say they don't want fathers to lose their kids or mainstream feminists who actively fight for fathers losing their kids?
If feminists wanted true equality, then we'd have it.
The dictionary definition says that, but in practice feminists want special rights.
Also notice how liberals love the dictionary definition of feminism, but hate it for racism, sexism, etc, etc, etc . That's the dictionary fallacy.
We can be critical of Trump, but we can't talk about Obama, unless it further the liberal narrative. We see it in so many threads.
You can talk about Obama, but why talk about Obama in a thread about Ted Nugent and Hillary Clinton? Because Nugent never mentioned Hillary, and Hillary isn't working with Obama. So the only reason to bring up Obama is to derail the thread, or to deflect.
If you want to talk about Obama, then create a thread about Obama.
See, thread nazis.
I'm guessing this is nothing but a thread to attack conservatives.
We can be critical of Trump, but we can't talk about Obama, unless it further the liberal narrative. We see it in so many threads.
As far as I know, not a single government employee got in trouble for it.
Both were bad.
Besides, Obama isn't the President anymore, so stop fucking talking about him. As a liberal, you should know your own dogma. "No talkie talkie about Obama."