Most of the UK doesn't have mayors. In fact, excluding London, mayors are something that came in in the last 10 years.
Most "mayors" in the UK are little more than Walmart greeters with drag queen necklaces, silly hats, and a silly cloak. In Scotland, we have Provosts. They have no power. The power is with the Chairperson of the council.
As the mayor of London, he does have quite a bit of power.
A lot of the crap he says has no bearing on the UK. He mostly spouts his leftist bullshit.
Having different products based on location is extremely common and normal. In the midwest, you are more likely to sell bratwurst than you are in Texas.
Gas stations also charge different prices based on location. Land rents, property taxes, etc, etc, etc all affect prices.
As to the issue of mostly white greeters, could it be that it's mostly whites who apply for the job?
As Anita Sarkeesian so famously pointed out; everything is racist, everything is homophobic, everything is sexist and you have to point it all out.
This is another idiot teacher, but basically the same message.
It kinda reminds me of that South African girl who said that science is racist because we don't teach magic, which all black people know magic is real.
So, the left is "good" because they are targetting a group for not being inclusive. Hypocrites.
I don't identify with the group in that poster because I find much of it odd, but I'm willing to accept them as part of the gay community just like every other group.
I always love how the left declares itself the be the moral ones while being extreme hypocrites at every turn.
I have 2 bike locks and neither has been used to smash people in the head to make them agree with me.
According to the new "gay flag", skin color is now a sexuality or something. It' still racist though because it only includes black and brown people.
The Guardian is a very far left rag, so anything they say has to be taken in that light.
One example is that they reported that 24% of the homeless in the UK was women. They deleted any comments that reminded people that 76% of the homeless were men. They also deleted comments about how the UK, despite gender equality laws making it illegal, gives women priority over men when it comes to getting help not to be homeless.
I'm sorry, but it's the left who sets occupied buildings on fire to prevent speech they don't like.
It's the left that smashes people over the head with bike locks who disagree with them. They even smash people over the head for trying to prevent fighting.
It's the left that claims the moral high ground but needs to hide their faces.
It's the left that fakes hate crimes for whatever reason du jour.
I don't care about being on a side, but I do care about truth.
The author admitted that most of the stuff is unprovable and he wrote the narrative that suited his opinion of what happened.
There's plenty of videos on YouTube about this, many even show him admitting it.
So, let's do an honest examination of that stupid "poster".
It's not about being inclusive since it ridicules a group of people.
It would have been simpler and taken less writing to say; "you're not a good fag unless you're a fag we agree with".
I also forgot that the rainbow flag was a single color.
Isn't it "superficial" to demand that everyone in the gay community be exactly the same?
As we see in the Politics section here, if you don't worship the lunacy from the left, you are a self-loathing homophobe, nazi and every other name common from the hive mind.
And you don't see the irony of my access to the site being threatened for something I said in argument against your argument against freedom of speech on social media? I see 60 is an overestimate.
Fred can't threaten anyone's access to the site. He can warn people that their actions might lead to being blocked from the site for breaking the rules.
More nastiness from the left.
Sadly, social media is run by a bunch of brain-dead assclowns on the far left.
I'm far more pissed off about the way universities are taking federal $$$$ while denying those they disagree with their right to free speech.
I would not refuse to employ someone simply because they are Christian, Muslim, Hindu etc.. but if I learned that a person disapproved of me because of my sexuality based on their religious beliefs, even if I just learned it from their personal social media, they would be out the door in a second.
That would be illegal in most of the west.
Even in countries that include both sexual orientation and religion in their non-discrimination laws, religion is given a much higher priority than sexual orientation. Non-discriminiation laws allow believers to refuse to hire gays in certain areas, but gays have no such allowances, even when the person wanting to be hired is telling you that his religous beliefs say you should be killed for being gay.
Censorship is only illegal by a government body (excluding courts), in the US. The US is the only country with "free speech".
While we (GT.ru staff) believe in free speech, we do have rules about certain things.
and still you've found nothing. as your pathetic president would say, "Sad!"
It's more than the Hillary lovers have found on Trump.