Originally, the criminal muslim's face was blurred out and the police denied the reason behind the attack.
The criminal muslim's face, unblurred, was leaked with audio online, so they started to show his face even in the MSM.
Posts made by raphjd
-
RE: [German] Teens Embrace ‘Foreigners Out!’ Anthem in Nightclubsposted in Politics & Debate
-
RE: Alex Soros thinks "Trump is convicted felon!" is an ownposted in Politics & Debate
Liberals are extreme partisan hacks.
They finger their pussies with glee when their side gets to fuck over conservatives, but would have a massive hissy fit if the tables were turned.
-
RE: Idaho Drag Performer Wins $1.1 Million in Defamation Suit Against Bloggerposted in Politics & Debate
I've mentioned the ones I remember discussing here. I don't remember this case.
Of course, you aren't interested in discussing the naughty drag queens.
-
RE: Jury instructions conclude in Trump's NYC criminal trial, here's what the jury was toldposted in Politics & Debate
I think you meant to so that Trump would nuke the entire world to save Baron, while Biden would help route out crime everywhere it's found because Dems, especially Biden, are saints.
-
RE: Jury instructions conclude in Trump's NYC criminal trial, here's what the jury was toldposted in Politics & Debate
You might remember that the Biden DOJ was going to let the gun charges time out.
It was also the Biden DOJ/IRS that offered Hunter a sweetheart deal on the tax invasion.
Liberals love to say that Biden didn't order it, but if it was Trump and Baron, would your really be as kind? Of course, not.
-
RE: Jury instructions conclude in Trump's NYC criminal trial, here's what the jury was toldposted in Politics & Debate
@jaroonn said in Jury instructions conclude in Trump's NYC criminal trial, here's what the jury was told:
@raphjd said in Jury instructions conclude in Trump's NYC criminal trial, here's what the jury was told:
Congress DOES NOT prosecute anyone.
I know that. You know I know that. And you know what I meant.
The reason I said that is because you are acting like the reason the DOJ doesn't prosecute is because there is no evidence.
It does not matter how much evidence Congress has if the DOJ refuses to prosecute.
The DOJ does what it wants, for political reasons. Likewise, the FBI does what it wants for political reasons.
-
RE: Jury instructions conclude in Trump's NYC criminal trial, here's what the jury was toldposted in Politics & Debate
Just because Congress has evidence of a crime (Eric Holder violating Congressional subpoena even after the courts stripped him of Exec Priv, for example) does NOT mean the DOJ will prosecute.
Even if the DOJ does prosecute, it does NOT mean they will do it fairly, compared to others in the same situation. We saw this with Ray Epps.
The DOJ went extremely weak on the FBI lawyer who falsified the CIA email. This fraudulent email was then used in the FISA court. That's fraud and perjury, but only got him 3 months probation.
Everyone protesting outside of the SCOTUS houses was in clear violation of federal law. Garland prosecuted none of them, except the guy who traveled from California to Virginia to kill Kavanaugh. According to the US Marshalls, that was about 500 people who were allowed to break federal law without being prosecuted. I doubt that they would have gotten off like that if they were protesting the liberal SCOTUS houses.
Imagine if, instead of New Black Panthers threatening white voters with nightsticks outside a polling place, it was KKK members threatening black voters with nightsticks. Do you honestly think Eric Holder would have dropped the charges as soon as the Obama Admin came into power? No one with an IQ over 1 believes that dropping the charges was anything other than political.
-
RE: Jury instructions conclude in Trump's NYC criminal trial, here's what the jury was toldposted in Politics & Debate
Congress DOES NOT prosecute anyone.
They have to rely on the FBI to investigate and the DOJ to prosecute.
We have seen what the FBI has done over the years. I mentioned 2 examples in a previous post.
The DOJ refused to prosecute Eric Holder, even after he was ordered by a federal court to obey the Congressional subpoena.
The DOJ refused to prosecute countless BLM and Antifa losers, despite clear evidence that they violated federal law.
The DOJ refused to charge/prosecute the people protesting outside of the SCOTUS houses in clear violation of federal law.
-
RE: Jury instructions conclude in Trump's NYC criminal trial, here's what the jury was toldposted in Politics & Debate
We know that Killary violated the Congressional subpoena, and destroyed the emails under said subpoena and other things.
Eric Strok altered the report on the Killary case to claim she didn't have "criminal intent" so she did nothing wrong. Watch the countless court videos on YouTube and see how many judges mention "criminal intent" when sentencing people for not obeying subpoenas.
The FBI lawyer confessed to illegally altering the CIA email which clearly said Cater Paige worked for them. It was altered so the email said that the CIA denied Carter Paige worked for them. He got 3 months probation, as well as keeping his job and law license.
Sussman should have been convicted.
Ray Epps is well-recorded for violating laws and others were sent to prison for decades over. He too only got 3 months of probation.
BLM and Antifa losers have also gotten weak sentences or prosecutions thrown out for their antics. As an example, those 2 lawyers who firebombed the police car with the 2 cops in it got virtually no sentences.
Lack of prosecution does not mean there's no evidence. It means there's a political motive.
It's like when Obama was elected back in 2008. 2 New Black Panther members were outside a polling place, on video, threatening white voters. They were arrested by the feds for violating federal voting laws. Once the Obama and Co came in, the charges were dropped.
-
RE: Never Trumpers now support former president following convictionposted in Politics & Debate
@jaroonn said in Never Trumpers now support former president following conviction:
@raphjd https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-verdict-makes-significant-number-republicans-less-likely-support-him-poll
Ok, let's look at the numbers;
35% more likely to support him
56% no change
10% less likely to support him
That is registered Repubs.
The prosecution put a sour taste in the mouths of Independents and Dems.
Even my mother who won't vote for anyone who's not a Democrat is voting Trump, according to my sister. It's the lawfare that converted her.
-
Fauci Says He Signed Off on Grants Without Reviewing Themposted in Politics & Debate
Fauci said he didn't do his job, so he did nothing wrong.
-
Jury instructions conclude in Trump's NYC criminal trial, here's what the jury was toldposted in Politics & Debate
As soon as Republicans regain power, I hope they do exactly the same thing to liberals as liberals have been doing to us.
Of course, liberals will be bleating on and on about how unfair it is because only liberals are supposed to do that to their enemies.
-
Portland's Soros whore DA kicked out of office for allowing crime rates to skyrocketposted in Politics & Debate
If crime only affected liberals, I'd have no problem with that since they are getting what they want.
-
RE: UK thought police arrest man - liberals turn UK into Russia and Nazi Germany, I mean Ukraineposted in Politics & Debate
For those unaware, Bethnal Green is a major Jewish area.
This is where Muslims decided to put up Palestinian flags after the 7 Oct 2023 terrorist attack. It's not a thought crime to do this to Jews, but as we've seen in a previous case, it's a crime to wrap a piece of bacon around a sign in a Muslim area.
Certain groups have extreme special rights, despite their constant bleating on about being oppressed.