Barney Frank explained the difference in laws by saying that you don't want people to commit violence against elected officials to get their way.
++++
In the UK, there are literally 2 different workplace laws.
The various "national" governments have workplace rules, but the rest of us have workplace laws. Did you catch the difference?
Donald Trump never wore a Nazi uniform, Harry did.
My experience with James Hewitt, is that he's pretty down to earth while being a traditionalist. In other words, right of center.
It's clear that she's an evil gash, who deserves to be beaten up by male feminists.
There's a lot of it going on.
I think that that makes up 99.9999999999999999999% of the rise in "hate crimes" we have seen since Obama.
The left hate talking about false flags because it defeats their narrative.
When I hear about rape claims, I think back to my own case, Jackie at UVA, Duke LaCrosse, and countless others. There is virtually nothing that happens to these lying cunts, like there are for other cases of lying about being victims of crime.
False flaggers, like false rape claimers, are protected by the system. We keep seeing this in these hoax cases where the guilty are never named and/or prosecuted for the shit they pulled.
When writers for rags such as TEEN Vogue, say they have no problem with men being destroyed by false claims, you get an understanding of the mentality of the left and those who protect them.
Feminist Rebecca Watson broke the mold and was one of the first, if not the first, to say that false rape claims are 8% of all rape claims vs the old 2%. HOWEVER, she still wants a JUST BELIEVE system where men are automatically sent to prison on a woman's say so, becaue 8% isn't that many men.
The West, either officially or unofficially, uses the Duluth Model that says that even with extreme proof that the woman is the agressor, the police are still supposed to arrest the man. California got rid of the Duluth Model, but quickly switched back to it when it started to have women being arrested at higher amounts. This is the kind of shit the left see as gender equality.
St Olaf College had a fake racist hate incident.
Black student, Samantha Wells found the note below on her car;
I am so glad that you are leaving soon. One less NIGGER that this school has to deal with. You have spoken up too much. You will change nothing. Shut up or I will shut you up.
It appears that she did it to herself.
Oddly, students guilty of false flagging get protected by "FEDERAL STUDENT PRIVACY" laws, but if it was a true hate crime that same law wouldn't apply. Pretty hypocritical, but expected from the leftist cunts.
Even after the college proved it was a not a real racist event, they still held several anti-white racist events to protest non-hate crime.
It was Harry's great grandmother and the Arch-bishop of Canterbury who ousted the last royal who married an American divorcée.
This has long been a tactic of the left.
Think back to that racist incident on the college campus bus, where 4 black girls were victims of racist abuse. It was reported on all the mainstream media, including Fox News.
Once the facts actually came out, the leftist media forgot to tell everyone that the CCTV on the bus proved the 4 black girls were actually the ones to instigate the entire event.
The same thing with the muslim girl whose care was grafittied. It was in all the mainstream news outlets when it happened and whitey was blamed. Once the actual truth came out that she did it herself and was caught doing it on CCTV, the mainstream media forgot to tell the world that she was a lying cunt.
Rinse and repeat with countless "hate" crimes.
Cenk from TYT says he hates false flags. HOWEVER, he still doesn't correct the story when the actual truth comes out that a so called "hate" crime was nothing more than a false flag.
Morristown NJ had 5 black churches vandalized in a single night. Obviously, it could be nothing but white people being racist.
Nope, Zuri C. Towns is a 45yo black man. He confessed to vandalizing all 5 black churches.
It's the norm to completely end all connection to the person that gets banned.
I just watched another feminist justify women having no responsibility in rape prevention.
Why is rape the one thing that the victim has no responsibility to help prevent the crime?
If I leave valuables visible in my car and someone breaks in and steals it, my insurance won't cover it.
If I don't have 5 point locks on my exterior doors, my insurance won't cover any theft or damage.
If I don't have a fire break in the dividing wall of my duplex and there's a fire, my insurance won't cover it.
If I leave my keys in my car and it gets stolen, my insurance won't cover it.
If I went to Cabrini Green (when it used to exist) and got robbed, the police would tell me that it was stupid for me to go there.
If I was buying crack and got shot, police would tell me it was my own stupid fault.
He ended up pleading guilty, that's why the sentence ended up so short.
Anyway, he didn't move like a 62yo.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5108107/Student-writes-white-lives-matter-N-word-mirror.html
A black girl writes WHITE LIVES MATTER NIGGERS!!! on the girls' bathroom mirror.
She was busted and eventually admitted doing it.
Here's the kicker; the school district is still blaming white people.
It screams volumes that they would rather have an SJW baby rapist be verified, than conservatives.
Twitter said they are de-verifying conservatives because they claim, the verification symbol, despite their FAQ page saying otherwise, makes some people think they are endorsed by Twitter. Based on this logic, they must endorse raping baby boys.
YouTube has been hit with another scandal.
While YouTube focuses on banning "wrong think" (non SJW) channels, they are ignoring everything else.
You can be a black supremacist, calling for the death/murder of all whites and YouTube refuses to do anything about it. They claim that calling for the murder of all white people is not racism (same with Facebook and Twitter).
HOWEVER, despite YouTubers (myself included) complaining about the horrible child videos (exploitation and abuse), YouTube ignored us. Well, now that's been made public, YouTube has lost more advertisers.
Here's the kick in the cunt; YouTube is punishing "wrong think" channels even harder than before so that "correct think" channels don't get punished for this problem.
Twitter hates wrong thinkers (people who aren't SJWs) but loves people who love babies a little too much, as long as they tweet pro-SJW shit.
Ian Watkins (google "Ian Watkins baby rapist") is still verified by Twitter, while Twitter de-verifies and bans conservatives.
Maybe he's allowed to stay because he likes to rape baby boys, not baby girls. You know, the whole gender equality thing.
Come on leftists, here's your chance to sing the praises of Twitter again, like you usually do when they ban the baddies.
Not surprisingly, not a single leftist is condemning this cunt. Go figure.
It tells me that they support her bullshit.
People change, so something they did 50 years ago doesn't mean it represents them now.
Ok, let's leave "juvenile" alone and just look at "adults". Let's assume that all crimes we're discussing happened on or after the 18th birthday.
As an example, when I was young, I used to get really, really drunk when out with friends. As I aged, my drinking got less and less and for the last 10+ years, I barely drink. We still have the bottle of wine the previous owner of this house gave us on completion.
Congressman Barton is being portrayed as the villain in virtually every "news" article about the case.
HOWEVER, the woman in the story is guilty of "revenge porn" in Texas, DC, most US states and the EU. Why is no one talking about this side of the issue?
Sure, Barton is a douche bag for cheating on his wife, but that's not a crime in Texas and DC.
Why is revenge porn such a huge topic when it's done to a woman, but nobody gives a shit when it happens to a man?
The answer is simple; VAGINALISM. It teaches us that only women can be victims and men can only be perpetrators.
I know that if the leftists join the thread, they will do the following;
1. use extreme mental gymnastics to justify it
2. quote something I said that has nothing to do with this topic
3. attack me but ignore the topic
4. if we're lucky, they will admit their side if nothing but a bunch of liars who care nothing about gender equality
Do you seriously want to be arrested at 35 or 50 for that piece of candy you shoplifted when you were 5?
I support the current system where serious crimes, like murder, never go away.