AGAIN, since you are special needs.
Just because it is written down, does not mean that they follow their own rules.
I said that Twitter says that kiddie porn doesn't violate their TOS and in the case I mentioned, I am 100% right. Twitter's stance in that case is that kiddie porn does not violate their TOS.
I know you are too stupid to understand that.
Yet, Twitter told that family that they would not remove it because it didn't violate their TOS.
GOT IT?! Of course, you don't because you're a liberal.
It's funny that you feel the need to fight me over this when Twitter's actions are extremely disgusting in this case.
@bc22
Just because some idiot said something extremely ignorant, doesn't negate that liberals deem everything white supremacy.
YES, to sane people the OK sign and thumbs up are just that, but to liberals, they were parts of white supremacy. People lost their jobs over that because of the liberal cancel culture.
Yet, I showed that they won't remove kiddie porn unless Homeland Security demands they do.
So again, just because you are special needs. Just because something is written down, doesn't mean they follow that.
Ah, so because they wrote it down, that means that is how they enforce their rules.
You're an idiot.
LOL, you are a pathetic clown.
So, you would happily accept being banned from here, without ever complaining about it, because you have no right to free speech here?
Of course, you wouldn't. You would whine to everyone how I'm a fascist because I banned you because of your free speech.
And yet you clearly didn't read my link.
They refused to remove the child porn because it didn't violate their TOS.
They only removed it because Homeland security got involved.
Why are you trying to defend their shitty action?
@bc22
How does that defeat my comment?
It's like how you guys claimed the OK hand sign was the white supremacy sign.
@gerggently said in The Lincoln Project and sexual harassment:
Are you saying that a private company cannot set out ToS for the platform it has created?
ToS is not editorialising.
As I already asked, would I be totally in my rights and you would willingly accept it If I banned you because you are too childish enough to say Trump's name properly?
Nah, you'd whine and we all know it.
Besides the fact that you are such a child that you can't say Trump's name properly, what does it have to do with anything?
You are all butt hurt about how Trumpsupposedly treats women, but you feel it's ok to discount women who don't agree with you.
Typical liberal.
Seems like someone is clueless about what is going on in the world;
https://nypost.com/2021/01/21/twitter-sued-for-allegedly-refusing-to-remove-child-porn/
@bc22
Other than liberals, who is screeching that everything is "white supremacy"?
SanFransico Unified School District Art Department changed its name from VAPA (Visual and Performing Arts) to SFUSD Art Department because acronyms are "white supremacy".
No duh, the Supreme Court has been clear on free speech.
Are you saying I would be totally within my right to ban you and the rest of the swamp monster?
Twitter has set rules for what is allowed and what is not allowed, as a publisher would do.
Ironically enough, Twitter says kiddie porn doesn't violate their TOS, but saying "but they aren't women, though" does violate their TOS. What does it say about you that you are defending them.
NYT is a publisher. They control what is published, therefore they are liable for what is on their site.
Twitter is a platform, so they have no legal liability for what is posted. HOWEVER, they act as a publisher by controlling what is published.
Has anyone seen AOC's video where she compared her being the victim of sexual assault to Cruz and Hawley disputing the Electoral College votes?
It's as if she is trying to get people to view Cruz and Hawley as rapists. I do believe it's intentional.
@swegay said in What gives you the best orgasms?:
What makes you enjoy the best orgasms ever?
Netiquette dictates that when you ask a question, you also give your own answer.
There is an exception when it's for research, but you would need to clarify this.