He was the only member of his immediate family to survive Auschwitz. He was the youngest of 14 kids, to Orthodox Jewish parents. I have no idea about his extended family.
It took 36 years for him to talk publicly about his experiences during the Holocaust. He said he only came forward because he could no longer allow Holocaust deniers to spread their lies.
He was the last surviving member of the Hogan's Heros cast.
As far as bannings go, I have perma-banned very few people over the last 16 years. If you include F46660T and his 3 other accounts, I have reached a whopping 10 perma-bans.
@hubrys should have been banned on our first encounter for breaking the site rules outside of the Politics section.
Not surprisingly, the people that complain about me handing out (perma or temp) bans are the same people that defend it when social media sites do it. Nor do they complain when other gay sites ban people for having discussed their conservative views.
@soraspeir81's whole argument in this thread was based strictly (and dishonestly) on Spore/Spores as pronouns. This was intentional because if his argument was based on all the idiotic made-up pronouns (and genders), then he has absolutely no argument.
Even on the bogus premise, he tried to argue, people are demanding that I, me specifically, use their preferred pronouns by getting laws passed that require me to use whatever stupidity they come up with.
Canada, Scotland, California, and many others have passed laws that require people to use these words or be guilty of hate crimes. England does not have such a law, so the police invented "non-crime hate incidents". While it has no bearing in law, they put it on your criminal record as if you were convicted of it. This can prevent you from getting a job, credit, rental agreements, etc, etc, etc. Despite the UK Supreme Court telling them to stop it, it still happens.
Jordan Peterson got famous directly because of Canada's law, which he objected to.
Many universities also require the use of preferred pronouns or you canbe expelled.
Social media does as well.
Liberals need to be blatantly dishonest in these discussions, in order to "win" and at the same time pretend things are not as bad as they really are.
@hubrys is the guy that called me an asshole and a liar over a graphic pornographic book in at least 2 elementary school libraries, available to 6yos.
His counter-argument was that since no 6yo actually checked out the book, it was fine.
He supports grooming and sexualizing kids.
That was our first encounter on the site.
Biden admitted it was "probably unconstitutional" but did it anyway.
Pelosi said it was unconstitutional, that only Congress had that power.
The court ruled it unconstitutional.
Now it's your time to be the usual troll, that you love to be.
If you can have an honest discussion, even if we don't agree, then you have nothing to worry about.
People like you think you have the right to be a total asshole to anyone you disagree with, with no comeback while supporting cancel culture.
What photo?
Well, we all know the FBI was the driving force behind the Gov Whitmer kidnapping plot. This came out in the trials of the supposed kidnapping plotters.
The indictments for both the kidnapping and Jan 6 have a lot of "unindicted co-conspirators". In the kidnapping case, they were all either FBI agents or informants who were allowed, by the DOJ, to do what the FBI legally could not.
The discussion is over because he can't have an honest discussion.
Sadly, this is the way with most liberals.
You have a pathological need to be a troll.
You can't help but be a troll.
Keeping being a troll.
Ah, so no one is demanding that everyone use their pronouns.
Again, you are a liar, troll or most likely BOTH.
Dudette, you don't understand the fucking point I was making, either because you are a dumb fuck or a troll, most likely both.
You are such an idiot.
I never said that people are demanding that I use "spore" as my pronoun. I said that you losers are demanding that everyone use their made-up bullshit pronouns. No one is shocked at how utterly dishonest you are.
https://www.express.co.uk/news/uk/1696813/Just-Stop-Oil-M25-protest-Louise-Harris-TikTok-hypocrisy
Why am I not surprised that these people are extreme hypocrites?
Generally, I'm not opposed to drag shows for kids, but it needs to be age appropriate and checks need to be done to prevent sex offenders from being part of it.
As for books in the library, there have been cases in the US where school libraries have had sexually graphic books available for kids as your as 6yo to check out. We had that discussion here. The excuse is that even though it was that even though 6yos could check it out, none had so it was no big deal. Even stranger is that if the books were in a public library, they would have to be sectioned off and proof of age would be needed to check them out, but in schools that's not an issue.
There has been some cases where drag queens have done bad things around kids at these "family friendly" events. I posted about some of them.
One of the problems was the DQ who did story time with a short skirt and no knickers. There have been convicted pedos doing these shows. A recent one is Texas was a DQ performing routine that was sexually graphic for a family brunch show.
In the UK, they hired a gay circus troop to do a reading event for kids. The "ring leader" was dressed like a slut, the monkey had his ass out and a big old dildo in the front, fully exposed.