• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. raphjd
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 1
    • Followers 37
    • Topics 2739
    • Posts 13254
    • Best 892
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 2

    Posts made by raphjd

    • RE: Germany - The more things stay the same - Interior Minister wants to crush opposition

      @jaroonn

      You do know that Robert Byrd was extremely high up in the KKK and was a hero to people like Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, and many more. Strom Thurmond is the only "Dixiecrat" of note who switched parties.

      Racist Margaret Sanger (founder of Planned Parenthood) who called blacks "weeds that need to be exterminated" was also a hero of Hilary Clinton and most Democrats.

      What did Biden, both Clintons and virtually every Democrat call blacks to justify the 1994 Crime bill? Oh, that's right, they called super predators, unsocialized, uncivilized.

      Biden said he was against desegregation because he didn't want his kids to go to school in a racial jungle. You might remember that Kamala called him out on that during one of the early DNC Presidential debates. Of course, she forgot about it when he asked her to be his running mate.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: USSA watch: conservatives at CPAC announce plan to "end democracy"

      @blablarg18

      Technically, it's not satire since it's exactly what the left has been doing.

      Well, I guess it's satire because the right is saying it's their platform as a joke.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The experts weigh in.

      @jaroonn

      You are just delusional.

      Your "true journalism" is doing nothing but feeding you its leftist propaganda.

      Try watching and listening to what people actually say. Watch Congressional hearings and listen to what people actually say.

      Look at the actual government stats for things. Like most of the west, the UK monitors domestic threats. Various leftist assholes claim that white people are the greatest threat to the county, despite over 90% of people on the threat watchlist being Islamists. The remaining people are made up of other various threats.

      When the media won't tell you the races of the people involved, it's because the bad guys are non-white but most likely black. The same thing when they claim they can't name the bad guy because they are a minor.

      You will believe 51 lying "intel experts" who go lying on tv about Trump, but when Shitty Schift's secret hearings in the bunker are declassified, lefts refuse to watch Tucker Carlson's video where he shows the video of the clip(s) of the public lie compared to the sworn testimony.

      Let's not forget Google distorting reality. The leaked video right after Trump won in 2016 where the CEO said that Google would work to prevent Trump from winning in 2020. Or Google's Gemini AI that refuses to show white people. It can't create a white family, but it can create any other race of family due to DEI.

      That is just a tiny sample of the shitty world you regressives have created.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • Police say this driver is on tape crushing a mother and daughter at 70mph in a city crosswalk and he is already out on bond

      https://notthebee.com/article/this-man-is-on-tape-crushing-a-mother-and-daughter-at-100mph-on-a-city-crosswalk-and-he-is-already-out-on-bond

      The murderer was driving over 70mph and running red lights.

      The judge let him out on bail 2 days later.

      You can find the unedited video on Twitter.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The experts weigh in.

      @jaroonn

      Maybe you should stop burying your head in the sand of "true journalism" and find out what your side is actually saying and doing.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The experts weigh in.

      @jaroonn said in The experts weigh in.:

      Just to name a few examples...
      "Anti-racism" means racism (and anti-fascism means fascism).
      "Gender-affirming care" means "mutilating and sterilizing vulnerable and confused people for profit".
      "Welfare" means "we force you to hand over your money so we can redistribute it to those we deem more deserving", because who wouldn't want more welfare? (same goes for "social security")
      "Diversity and inclusion" means "less white men and everyone must see things our way".
      "Equity" means "discrimination based on immutable characteristics".
      "Safe space" means "only those who agree with us are welcome".

      You're obviously from 1 of the 3 countries where conservatives are called "liberals".

      Every point you posted is 100% true.

      We have posted examples of each one that proves us right. Of course, people like you never see that because your "true journalism" doesn't post about these things because it goes against the leftist narrative.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Climate Change: like a (backwards, evil) Santa Claus

      @blablarg18

      El Nino and La Nina is an 8-10 year cycle between the height of one to the height of the other. According to science, it's been going on since the middle of what's now the US stopped being a sea at the end of the Cretaceous period.

      It's a natural climate change that existed before the leftists even heard the term climate change.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Ranch hand

      @123dasilva

      That means the account owner deleted the account.

      If he got in trouble, then it would say the account is suspended.

      posted in Who Is This/What Video Is This
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The experts weigh in.

      @jaroonn

      I know you are dumb, so I'll let you in on the secret.

      The black boxes in the picture edits, so it can be published in public.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The experts weigh in.

      @jaroonn

      I know your actions & statements here.

      There's a massive difference between condemning things that we are not currently discussing vs things we are.

      You refuse to condemn porn in schools, in every thread we discuss it.

      Clearly, you can't understand what porn is, even when it's extremely graphic.

      This is graphic porn;

      gg-bhwuxaaa64_0.jpg

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Report: Canadian school sends kids home with pornography

      @blablarg18

      It's strange how certain liberals claim they don't support this shit, but they refuse to condemn it.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The experts weigh in.

      @jaroonn

      Your actions and stances are more than reason enough to hate you.

      Unlike you, I am willing to condemn things I find bad/evil.

      Lynching is evil.

      You refuse to condemn putting porn in school libraries.

      You refuse to condemn giving school kids wooden penises and gay porn.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The experts weigh in.

      @raphjd

      Ok, you didn't like that specific thing.

      MY BAD

      That being said, you do like K-5 kids being provided with porn.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The experts weigh in.

      @jaroonn

      Umm, are you saying you didn't support schools giving kids wooden penises along with that BLM and trans propaganda?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The experts weigh in.

      @jaroonn said in The experts weigh in.:

      The level of discourse at your trailer park roundtables is truly inspiring. lol

      This is aimed at those you disagree with.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The experts weigh in.

      This picture was taken in 2012, while Obama was President.

      Your "true journalism" withheld the set of pictures, then published them in 2017 claiming they were taken while Trump was President.

      They knowingly lied and people like you just believed it even after the truth came out.

      DeOGTuHVAAAw0Sa.jpg

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The experts weigh in.

      @jaroonn

      Your own words in the various threads show what you are about.

      I haven't called you trailer trash or the like because I don't know you.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The experts weigh in.

      @jaroonn said in The experts weigh in.:

      @raphjd said in The experts weigh in.:

      You think it's ok to provide very young kids with porn, but that parents can't read that same shit out loud in public meetings.

      Right. I have those exact works printed on a t-shirt and a bumper sticker.

      Do you really wonder when you say ridiculous things like this that it's difficult to take you seriously? Why do you equate gender identification and sexual orientation with porn? You might as well just call me a "communist" and move on because you are incapable of serious conversation.

      We've discussed the porn that your side is putting in school libraries.

      You support books that discuss anal sex and other sexual stuff in elementary schools aka for 5-10yo kids.

      You supported giving young school kids wooden penises in a recent thread.

      You and your ilk are nothing more than groomers and pedos.

      You, people, are the ones claiming that not being allowed to talk to kids about sex is "LGBT genocide".

      Strangely, you people love putting books in school libraries, but don't want parents to read from them or show pages from the books in public meetings because they are deemed "offensive" to liberal adults.

      415052456_7864191953607143_4303151549390428745_n.jpg

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The experts weigh in.

      @jaroonn said in The experts weigh in.:

      @raphjd said in The experts weigh in.:

      You remind me of the chick on the Jubilee episode who claimed to be the superior intellect of the group because she had a PHD and worked for a company (not stated which) that was working on covid vaccines. Turns out, she had the lowest IQ of the group.

      WTF?

      Maybe you should look it up and watch it.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: The experts weigh in.

      @jaroonn

      You are the one acting as if you are superior to everyone you disagree with by calling us trailer trash and claiming we are uneducated.

      You are the one that claims you get your "news" from "true journalism" which constantly proves it's nothing but leftist shit.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • 1
    • 2
    • 114
    • 115
    • 116
    • 117
    • 118
    • 662
    • 663
    • 116 / 663