Posts made by raphjd

https://twitter.com/i/status/1717290645193101569

@lololulu19

I don't think any of the bullshit they did was directed toward the victim's family.

It's the way they didn't give a fuck that they were on trial for 1st-degree murder and several other charges from that day.

@lololulu19

Bronchiolitis obliterans, aka popcorn lung, is caused by inhaling the oils in the vape oil. This is especially the case with flavored oils.

Public Health England says it causes popcorn lung, while NHS England says it does not. NHS ENgland provides a service to swap people from cigarettes to vaping, so there's a conflict.

The American Lung Association and many others also link popcorn lung with vaping.

It should be noted that popcorn lung can be gotten from inhaling a lot of different toxic chemicals. That being said, most people are not in a position to be inhaling these chemicals.

If anyone else wants to join him on his vacation, just let me know.

@twinkerzzz

Sorry but Pawcorn is not here any more. Nor was he in charge of the forums.

Also, do not tell me how to the the job I've done for 17 years.

@drekkin said in The site and the new UK Online Safety Laws:

@raphjd It's a political topic. Move it to the politics section. You're an admin

You made it political, when there was no reason for it.

I should give you a vacation, for that stunt.

@drekkin

I will not play your games.

You brought in your politics. You even admit that.

There was no strawman by me, since I was simply correcting your political falsehoods.

The whole world is not a toxic left v right, us v them contest like you seem to see it. Like I said, I come from a different political culture and this pointless trench warfare is something which adds literally nothing to political discourse.

That sounds like a bunch of BS considering you didn't need to bring politics into this discussion, but you chose to.

BTW What you did is the epitome of a strawman argument. You brought up negative things done by someone else to draw attention away from the issue at hand. As a forum admin I thought you would at least be able to grasp that basic concept.

You clearly don't even know what the term "strawman" means.

Me correcting your politically motivated lie, to bash conservatives, is not anywhere close to the definition.

This part of the law seems to be an attempt to pander to the moral outrage brigade who are in a perpetual state of Daily Mail induced panic or rage. Its only impact will be to annoy adults who are trying to do something perfectly legal.

That is what YOU said.

You fully intended to do the us vs them, you dishonestly claimed to be against, otherwise you would not have done it.

DO NOT try to gaslight us that, that was not your intent.

Hell, you even admitted you made it political, so you knew what you were doing. Now you are butt hurt because I'm not letting you get away with it.

@twinkerzzz

The person who admitted to bringing politics into the thread is the person who derailed it, with said politics.

This is not the politics section.

@blablarg18

Liberals love the CCP.

ANd the CCP loves useful idiots.

@blablarg18

I saw the video, it was disgusting how they thought it was funny.

@drekkin

 I didn't say I wasn't being political

Honesty is a good step.

But what I said was related to the law under discussion.

Bashed conservatives, while intentionally ignoring the role of liberals in the matter.

You brought up a whole litany of unrelated people, entities and proposed laws

Those things are directly related to the comment you made as it was Tony Blair who stated it all. Therefore it was the liberals you need to bash.

 in an attempt to drag the conversation into a left v right mud slinging contest.

AH, you get to bash conservatives, but I can't show you the truth about your rubbish.

 If you have anything to add to the conversation, that is actually related to the law under discussion, besides strawman arguments and rhetoric, then please do.

What strawman? You admitted that YOU were political, to basn conservatives, while disotrting the truth.

You need to take your own advice and stick to the topic at hand, and leave your BS politics out of it.

Also, there was no strawman from me since you falsely laid the blame on conservatives and I pointed out that ou were wrong.

If you want to fanatize that conservatives are the root of all evil then take it to the politics section.

@lololulu19

Vaping is extremely bad.

@drekkin

This part of the law seems to be an attempt to pander to the moral outrage brigade who are in a perpetual state of Daily Mail induced panic or rage.

NAH, you weren't getting political.

@dex71

StreamFab (by DVDFab) works.

They say it works for all of it, but I only have personal knowelege with free subs, not paid.

@twinkerzzz

As you are clearly an extreme leftist, I don't care what you think and clearly the site owner does not either. If you are unhappy with my political views, I'm sure there are plenty of sites that will make you happy.

The Snooper's Charter was first brought up by Tony Blair. He may not have called it that, but the principle behind it was from him.

True, the paid for ID is not currently a requirement, but it was something that Blair/Brown first brought up.

The Guardian is a ultra left rag, except to those too blinded by their ultra leftism to see it. I don't care what awards they have won by a profession full of ultra leftist. It's just like the PR awards in Ab Fab.

@pupkinvasya

Thanks.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/sheila-jackson-lee-addresses-leaked-audio-tape-of-her-viciously-berating-staff

Any idea who the guy in the big pic is or which video this is?