As a gay man, what laws have been passed against me?
I'm talking about actual laws, not ones MSM outlets lied about.
The law that made harsher punishments for indecent behavior in public does not count as it applies to everyone regardless of sexual orientation. It's only homophobic to those who believe that LGBTs can't act in a decent manner while in public.
Nor does the Florida law that bans gay pornography in school libraries, count as homophobic laws.
I do not doubt that "over 90%" refers to drugs actually caught at PoEs vs caught away from PoEs.
"Entering" is the term that is often used in these hearings when they refer to drugs that actually make it into the interior of the US and get into the hands of the drug dealers.
I'll have to find the video (Senate hearing on DEA) I mentioned since it was said there. It's been said in other videos as well.
In the video, Ted Cruz questioned the DEA woman about problems of Border patrol agents being taken from the border so they can babysit the illegals. I don't know her title or name, but she's clearly very high in the DEA.
Correct, more people are being processed by the BP. That was because of his stated policies, prior to the election.
With the open border policies, we need more border agents so they can cope with the border itself, as well as babysitting the illegals.
I'm pretty much only referring to the southern border aka Mexico. This is where, according to the government and politicians on both sides, say that most illegal drugs come across.
By lax border patrols and policies, I'm talking about border patrol officers spending more time away from the border and more time with those caught and in custody.
If you go to YouTube and look for Forbes Breaking News, they play (usually live) the various House and Senate hearings, without editing or editorial bs. I prefer straight from the horse's mouth.
I agree, they can only honestly report on what they know about.
This is not how they do it though. They claim that over 90% of drugs entering the US come in via PoEs and are carried by US citizens.
They almost never say "caught" but simply say "entering".
Even saying "caught" is quite dishonest since Biden has reduced border patrols so we have more gotaways than we should.
I have no idea how other Admins have reported the figures, but we do know that even by their own figures, more gotaways are flooding across the border than under any previous President.
It wasn't an article, but a Senate Committee questioning the DEA about drugs entering via the southern border.
NOTE: The use of "you" is generic.
Maybe, but how do you know if you are catching 99% of the fentanyl entering via points of entry or 1%? You only know what you are catching.
If you catch 100 tons per day, who is to say what percentage that is of all the drugs entering via PoEs?
The only thing the government knows is how much they caught and which PoE they caught it at.
I think they want us to believe that everything comes through the PoEs to justify the lax border security along 95% of the border.
As every SHOULD know, the Biden Admin and government bodies all claim that over 90% of drugs come into the country via a point of entry.
OK, so they know the amount of drugs they catch. It's not disputed.
What I do dispute is how they "know" how much drugs come into the US that they don't catch.
If you don't catch it, who is to say that your numbers are correct? Why can't the other side say that over 90% of drugs coming into the US are from "gotaways"?
I say that 488 Quintrillion metric tons of fentanyl, per hour, comes across the border via gotaways. Prove me wrong.
My theory is just as sound as your theory that over 90% of fentanyl (and meth) come through via points of entry.
Unless you can prove the actual amounts of coming via both ways, you are just talking out of your ass.
By "confirmation bias" do you mean the mostly peaceful summer of love?
Do you mean the bike lock professor?
Do you mean Yvette Felarca?
Do you mean moldy locks?
Do you mean the pro-terrorist protests?
Do you mean beating a man nearly to death because you believe he might disagree with you?
Do you mean setting the occupied Berkeley library annex on fire because you don't want the speaker to be allowed to speak?
Do you mean smugly puff attacking retired couple walking their dogs because it (flip-flopped its gender to suit its needs) thought that they might be conservatives?
Do you mean Jonathan Yaniv and its mother who violently attacks anyone who calls out how perviness using his "trans" status to creep on young girls?
Do you mean throw molotov cocktails into occupied police cars?
Nowhere to the degree that it exits on your side.
Go back and read how I tried to get your side to condemn the violence on both sides and your side refused for ages. When I finally convinced a few to do it, the rest of your side shit all over them because they believed, probably still do, that violence by the left is always justified.
Your side even (back when we had the downvote) downvoted me for saying that genocide was evil.
You clearly didn't read the article.
The House sergeant at arms does sit on the Capitol Police Board, which also includes the Senate sergeant at arms and the architect of the Capitol. That board opted not to request the Guard ahead of the insurrection, but did eventually request assistance after the rioting had already begun.
Both SAAs work for the Queen of Insider Trading and Mitch the Bitch.
Also;
There is no evidence that either Pelosi or McConnell directed the security officials not to call the guard beforehand, and Hammill said after the insurrection that Pelosi was never informed of such a request.
The question is, did they look for evidence or just take the word of the side they support?
Unactioned death threats are not the same as actioned swatting.
Also, your side has been actively engaged in acts of violence for a long time.
You might remember Simone Sanders saying "Oh poor, poor white people, boo hoo" when an elderly white man was pulled from his car, beaten, and had his car stolen by a gang of blacks butt hurt about Trump.
You might remember the anti-Trump twat who stalked and murdered the guy wearing a MAGA hat, for nothing more than wearing said hat.
Then of course, we have the long history of Antifa and BLM.
The university can thank Obama/Biden for telling all universities to always side with the cooch person, no matter what, in the Dear Colleague letters.
So many men have been fucked over by this sexist shit and it's wonderful to see men starting to win in the courts..
It always shocks me that liberals love violence to get their way.
Liberals get extremely butt hurt if a conservative uses the slightest amount of violence, even for self-defense, but absolutely believe they are justified in murdering their enemies.
Talk about mental illness.
Tennessee Bureau of Investigation says these black sex offenders (and many more) are white.
https://sor.tbi.tn.gov/details/00095766
https://sor.tbi.tn.gov/details/00142830
https://sor.tbi.tn.gov/details/00094590
The religion of peace has been at it again in Nigeria.
This is who liberals support.
https://nypost.com/2023/12/26/metro/two-girls-14-and-16-stabbed-at-grand-central-on-christmas/
I blame all the anti-white violence on white liberals for spewing all the anti-white shit. You are actively promoting Charles Manson's race war.
You fuckheads constantly lie to black people about crime stats and everything else to make them think they are victims when they are not.
