-- not intended as necro-bump. this just feels On Topic... so, instead of creating a new (duplicate) thread?
I just got a "Access denied!" looking exactly like that. The Tab TITLE got the prefix
*** NO COMMON THEME ***
to the original torrent title. Would this be the reason it got removed?
It'd be a neat info-feature if this is so.
In my experience, tops tend to prefer shorter guys, and bottoms tend to like taller ones.
Personally, I like taller guys, which for an innocent :cough: little sweetie like myself fits the model. And when I find myself with someone shorter, I usually end up on top, contrary to my prefernces, and it even feels natural.
~ Neo
this does seem little problematic to me.
I mean, picture this:
you take this gorgerous litte sweetie home, do the mutual tests so you can ditch the condoms and go for broke. Only, his turns up positive, and he completely breaks down in tears. Would you be up to dealing with that situation?
Or, how about this:
you take the sweetie home and to the tests, come up clean and go for it. Then, a few weeks later someone tells you the sweetie is POZ, and your next test shows that now so are you? Could you take responisbility for your own actions instead of blaming the sweetie? Hell, did you even ask him? And, would you stop and consider if you got it someplace else?
Or, what if you had all-out bareback with someone else after that, and now the next guy also turns out POZ at his next test. Where does the blame go? It's certain to come up.
Sure, this little DIY kit does have obvious advantages. But sadly, people tend to stop using their head when there's a pill/shot/test you can take instead.
I'm just sayin…
~ Neo
Umm…
Has anyone been able to get their result without giving their email and a username/password?
First off, the 'Kinsey Scale' looks like a bored statistitian's lunch break argument for why his straight buddies should let him give them a blowjob; no mention of the 'did it / wanted to' issues, or availability of male and female offers. Ignore it.
Second: being a male porn performer is bloody hard work, and not a lot of men are cut out for the pressure of maintaining a hard-on in front of the camera and crew and constant interruptions. The ones that can perform, and reliably so, are mostly the ones who can ignore the distactions and focus on their work; meaning, doing a guy up the butt instead of a chick is merely just one more distraction to ignore and focus on whatever internal imagery gets him through the performance.
Keep in mind, I'm talking about feature porn movies, here; not the labels that spit out so many new episodes in a series every month.
The observation of more guys in straight porn going for the ass; I had a discussion about this with a straight buddy of mine, recently, and his take on it was that it comes down to 'getting noticed' in the flood of new porn productions entering the market. The trend is that things grow increasinly extreme, or fringe, or otherwise show something more than what has been shown before. Going for the ass is just one such 'something more'. It doesn't mean that straight guys in real life want to do it in the ass more than they used to; only that the ones who do want to can express it more freely, since it's become so visible in porn.
That said, I too watch straight porn from time to time; not sure why, exactly, because I always end up thinking it's bo-o-oring. If there's actually a proper story-plot, the action tends to be just lame; and if there's quality male beef, the chicks are often either limp-breasted and worn, or worse, overdoing the 'bedroom eyes' gig to the extent that they look half asleep or just plain drugged. And more often than not, the camera goes to great length to not show male anatomy any more than absolutely necessary.
And then, along comes the one that gets it all right so it just works for me, putting all my complaints to shame.
But all in all, it appears to me like gay porn is higher quality on average.
Or, does it just so happen that I tend to find the wrong titles in straight porn?
~ Neo
Lots of harness models to choose from. Would this one meet your expectations?
hxxp://www.homoware.com/harness/master-harness-xxxl-v2162
It's not exactly the same, but the one you posted might be custom-made; it's not that hard to make yor own.
From the RAW pics, number 1 (+3,4,5) is best; the direction of the cock going into the butt kinda 'points' to where the TITLE/LINK is located in the torrent listing layout. Also, it shows as straight-up as possible (the cross-theme indication to 'anal' is probably impossible to avoid) what's in the category; the number 2 pic might make a errant indication of 'something outdoors'.
Now, for the text. 1 and 3 are just flat too small, and number 5 comes too close to the edges; makes it look cramped.
Conclusion: #4 is the best. But…
The text is a different font than the rest of the category images. It's gonna stand out as an eye-sore. Fix that and it'll be as perfect as can happen within the 80/40 px limitation.
there is no point in having tags if they dont link to all the other torrents that have the same tag. otherwise they're just filler for idiots who cannot figure out from the pics or description what kind of porn it is. and what is the point of adding this sign ~ ?
There is an excellent explanation and description og TAGs (and the importance of ~ char) here:
http://forum.gaytorrent.ru/index.php?topic=13672.0
The issue of whether or not tags should be LINKs rather than search parameters is a topic for another, um, topic. (let's not clutter this one up)
[off-topic]
If you are the victim of someone overseeding(jumping on) let us know. I personally note a users profile when they do this. Enough times of doing it without the uploaders consent and I "deal with it".
[/off-topic]
Once more bringing us back the core problem behind this discussion. Meaning: not off topic at such.
This is dicussed at length (and at times in unfriendly vocabulary) here:
http://forum.gaytorrent.ru/index.php?topic=12710.0
I made my opinion on this issue crystal clear in that topic, but it appears it needs re-iterating:
A torrent site must never, ever, penalize its members for seeding
If members seeding too much (or at all, in whatever way at whatever time) is a problem, it means there's a fundamental unbalance in the seeder/leecher ratio. This should be handled in the back-end (I made a handful of suggestions in that other topic) out of view and with no ill consequences to the members.
Sorry, cumeaternc.
I don't take offence easily, but this comment did have me in 'unfriendly vocabular' state for a moment.
Replies to this post not related to 'the compromise' please in the above-mentioned topic to not clutter up an otherwise constructive discussion. (or feel free to bitch at me in PM)
I just couldn't let this one stand unchallenged.
So just to make sure that I'm understanding this correctly, the quality, resolution, etc of the video does not necessarily account for the rating of the torrent, rather the technical nature behind the way it is compiled, named, listed, etc., yes?
If the rating is purely a staff job (which is how I understand this proposal), evaluating the audio/video quality of the rip and encode would require you to download the torrented media before assigning a rating.
Sure, I suppose you could do that, but making it part of your job description to download possibly copyrighted material is just asking for trouble (I think I've said so in another topic somewhere, sometime…)
Video resolution is not a guarantee for good quality, and neither is file size, or bitrate (though, that tends to be a reasonable indicator).
And... the video (or audio) being of poor quality isn't necessarily the uploader's fault; it could be this is merely the best rip/encode available to him, or at all.
Reward the uploader for his part of the upload: that means, the data made available on the torrent page.
If the audio or video quality stinks for no good reason, it'll be in the comments from a zillion annoyed members. That's what the comments are for, isn't it?