Posts made by mitchymo

Anybody got any fresh content of Eli to upload in time for my birthday in a few days would be giving me an amazing birthday present.  :cheesy2: I'll throw some seedpoints in as a thankyou of course.  :hug2:

Yep, you can count me in his fan-club.

Jake Jenkins, Eli Black and Rio Garza.

Most of the wrestling sites seem to have a focus on muscle-god physiques, or the opposite in twinkyness. My types have been found on UCW and BG East.

@cannonmc:

stop wanting to ban things, please

Things??? Scat pictures is the only thing i've suggested i'd be happy to see banned.

@DDAC84:

Scat is currently only uploaded in the scat category, it ends up in other categories because people vote it into them

Like I said the only way to prevent that is do away with the category voting system.

but you have said in previous posts that images should be banned…

and that there should be a picture ban on it so others don't have to see it.

Which leads to the problem of people asking for other stuff to have the pictures banned, till we just end up with nothing.

I will email Pawpcorn and suggest removing the category vote on the scat category so that scat cant end up being voted into other categories… If it does get implemented then it does open a whole new can of worms...

I already stated in my previous post, that there are scat results with NO scat category attached to them. The primary category in QTM at least is user defined, so if i choose to upload cock and ball torture clips, and assigned it has themed movies, that is what it would be listed as until a moderator or somebody had it brought to attention. So removing category votes wouldn't work, and besides, its not the category system that is problematic where scat porn is concerned, its the imagery. So any 'fix' woud best be addressed there.

You are right that i suggested scat pics should be banned. Its a better compromise than banning scat altogether. No pun intended but, well maybe a bit, but scat is a whole other level of filth.

@DDAC84:

Scat is currently only uploaded in the scat category, it ends up in other categories because people vote it into them.

I did a scat search. Despite having the scat category blocked, the results showed 48 results in fetish, 2 in straight younger and 1 in clips. It also showed that many of these do not have the scat category attached to them. It would have thrown up more results if i didn't have a dozen other categories filtered out.

I get that most of these results are likely due to being uploaded prior to the scat filter being introduced, but the point is that the scat filter doesn't hide the imagery when the uploader decides what category is attached to it, and so even when somebody else attaches the scat category, it still remains listed as fetish, or any other category like i've shown example for.

I'm not saying ban pictures, not at all, but does anybody really need to see such graphic images prior to deciding whether to download or not?? If you don't like twinks, its not the same as people disliking fetishistic imagery, twinks are not my bag either, but they are not disgusting to look at, so if accidentally you see it, its not gonna turn you off.

I'm not throwing any strop over this issue so you know. I've taken all the maximum measures i can take myself, filtering the scat category, not using the 'browse' button, and carefully keeping my mouse pointer off the torrents as i scroll.
Accidents do happen though, and so the imagery is not completely unavoidable.

@gaypraha2:

Somebody with an interest in watching guys (or gals) being killed, is highly unlikely NOT to be a psychopath

waoww then we'v got a serious problems coz millions of people around the world watched the "Saw" movie franchise… :cheesy2:

Lol.  :cheesy2:

Not quite the same, but funny.

@DDAC84:

LOL….

Im not going down this route...

Yes it CAN be unhealthy, I've done it loads and never once got sick...
I am STI/STD free and have never once in my life had anything, and I've been playing with it for a long time.

My point about saying oral and anal or any other form of sex is unhealthy is that it carries a risk.

Just because YOU do not like something does not give you the right to slate it and force your beliefs on others.

This is an open forum/site and as long as it is not harming anyone then it should be a problem.

There is a compromise, it has its own category which can be filtered.

If I dont want to see twinky porn I filter it, its that simple, yes occasionally it will show up but that's life. I dont go around making unhelpful comments about twinky porn showing up.

Scat sex is less dangerous than BB, i dont see you slating BB sex? and saying allowing it is promoting it...?! - before you jump up and say that's a lie...
HIV virus can not survive in the gut, or outside the body, so smearing shit is less risky than taking a load up your arse eating. (even if they have a small wound in their rectum)
It is less risky than taking a load in your mouth. (even if they have a small wound in their rectum)

Don't believe me go ask your doctor.

So as stated before, dont like it go to gay-torrents.net's dying site they dont allow scat images.

Take Care 

I wouldn't consider scat LESS safe than BB. Given that feaces is contributory in large part to typhoid, cholera and polio, and that it still carries the risk of HIV and Hepatitis (as well as parasitic infection). The risks of BB are very low when participants are STI free. At best i would concur that scat is AS safe as BB, provided that the shit is not consumed (unless its your own, gut bacteria is person specific, so can be very unhealthy to eat somebody elses gut bacteria).

I accept your point about the health aspect, and accept that my opinion is primarily motivated by the act itself. I find it disgusting, i don't want to see it. I respect the scat filter, and have implemented it. It still comes up in fetish though.

As a member of gaytorrents.net, i agree it is dieing a death, i very rarely visit, but i respect it for shielding its members eyes from gross imagery. Its not like even scat pictures need to be banned, but a rule stating that scat content MUST be uploaded to the scat category, will work just fine.

Is life itself worth it?? It is what you make of it that matters.

I never joined with an invite. I bookmarked it and checked daily until they had an open day for new members.

If you want my advice, you don't need it. This site is THE BEST around. You don't get even half the content on the second best, and gaytorrents.org is not even 2nd best.

@DDAC84:

@mitchymo:

In relation to scat itself, its a very disturbing fetish. Its not just grossly disgusting, but its also very unhealthy. Shit contains bacteria that is naturally in your gut (and harmless there), but is dangerous bacteria when out of your gut!!! I question promoting it AT ALL.

But if you insist on having it:-
I can't help feeling that a simple 'no scat pictures' rule would be very helpful since such content is being uploaded to other categories. I have already filtered out the scat category, but it comes up in fetish too.

Uneducated people… FML

Anal sex is also unhealthy. So is oral sex. The world is unhealthy!

If it is legal then let it be. I just dont get why people get all prissy about it. Get over yourselves.
It is the internet, its a big bad weird place, if you dont like it switch off your PC/Phone/Tablet

Its so unhealthy that they "transplant" it to treat people... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fecal_bacteriotherapy

Opening a critique of another persons POV with a negative remark about their intelligence…not cool. It never wins debate because its cheap. You've tried to devalue my argument by superiorising your own intelligence. Unfortunately, you've called your own into question by  failing to pay attention to the fact that i stated bacteria in the gut is healthy, so your wikilink to bacteriopathy, as a bizarre argument to counter the argument that shit itself is unhealthy is pointless. Transferring shit into the gut is harmless, playing with it, ISN'T.

Also, to address your wider comment. Positive development never occurs through apathy. So the whole, "Its the internet, its a big bad weird place, if you dont like it switch off your PC/Phone/Tablet", is pretty lame.
It has about the same value as your best mate cheating with your other half telling you, "its not illegal dude, i'm a free agent, your partner is a ho, you got hurt, well that's life".

All that i have stated in my post is that scat is unhealthy, which it is (and not on par at all with your examples of anal and oral sex), and that there should be a picture ban on it so others don't have to see it. I bet there are far more people here who are bothered that it can even be found here, than those who have an interest in it.

I've been honest. I've questioned its existence here. I haven't gone as far as saying it should be banned though, have i??? I suggested a compromise.

@kwyjibo:

@mitchymo:

Bestdeaths is not so much gay interest, as wannabe serial killer interest imo. If you read their 'about' page, they tell you nothing at all about WHY they do what they do. That ambiguity is disconcerting.
If they said it was to help young actors practice their acting, or to provide horror movie directors with material, i could get it, but they don't say why.
Who gets off on watching guys being fake killed except maybe guys who actually think about doing it. Disturbing.

That's just silly. Would you rather have them sated by wanking to fiction, or would you rather they have no outlet and go out experimenting on people? Are you suggesting that people who enjoy watching Clive Barker's erotic horror movies will go out and do that to people? I'm pretty sure they don't. They just enjoy the movies.

No outlet? Are you kidding me? If someone is having thoughts, getting off on killing somebody, they need psychiatric help, not a website to fuel their desires. You can argue the case that providing an outlet helps to satisfy their desire so that they don't engage for real, but there are two problems with this. One is, that criminal psychologists generally support (though are divided based on lack of hard data) the idea that ramping up the content available, pushes the boundaries to a new point, where some people will need more than what is available to satisfy their desire. In this regard, having a boundary where their desire is kept low, such as seeing a guy strangled in a mainstream action movie, is much safer for society than having them enjoy an outlet purely focused on the killing, however fictional it is. The second point is, that we all know that most people don't act on the content that is portrayed in the media in relation to violent acts, and that it is the psychopaths in society most likely to do that. This gets to the very nub of the problem with the Bestdeaths website, that is, that you would have to be pretty pschopathic to be interested in such a thing. So this site isn't merely satisfying peoples curiosities, as it is encouraging psychos desirabilities.
It is very controversial as to whether such material actually helps or hinders. I believe it hinders. Do you think that a website which shows realistic computer generated images of children, in naked sexual contexts, is going to help satisfy the desire of a peadophile, or fuel it? The Norwegians proposed such a website. Very controversial. It likely would depend on the psyhopathy of the paedophile as to whether such content would satisfy or fuel their desires, with predatory peados being the fueled psychos.
Somebody with an interest in watching guys (or gals) being killed, is highly unlikely NOT to be a psychopath, so it stands to logical reason, that they would be fueled, not satisfied.

Chris Mears

Bestdeaths is not so much gay interest, as wannabe serial killer interest imo. If you read their 'about' page, they tell you nothing at all about WHY they do what they do. That ambiguity is disconcerting.
If they said it was to help young actors practice their acting, or to provide horror movie directors with material, i could get it, but they don't say why.
Who gets off on watching guys being fake killed except maybe guys who actually think about doing it. Disturbing.

In relation to scat itself, its a very disturbing fetish. Its not just grossly disgusting, but its also very unhealthy. Shit contains bacteria that is naturally in your gut (and harmless there), but is dangerous bacteria when out of your gut!!! I question promoting it AT ALL.

But if you insist on having it:-
I can't help feeling that a simple 'no scat pictures' rule would be very helpful since such content is being uploaded to other categories. I have already filtered out the scat category, but it comes up in fetish too.

I can imagine the huge turn-on that it would be to play the video that you secretly recorded of someone you really wanted to see naked, and then have a fucking great wank watching it. That is possibly what drives some people to do it. But you are taking an incredibly big risk, and aside from the humiliation if you are caught, as others have said, you are committing a criminal offence.

Let others be foolish enough to do it if they want that risk, but you be smart about it. Engage them in a conversation whilst drinking, perhaps suggest a bucket list that you write for each other, and be sure that you do the list for the guy you are interested in. Add something like go sunbathing at a nude beach, and then offer to go with them if they are reluctant. Create an incentive to encourage the guy to want to complete the tasks on his list. First one to complete their tasks wins something, whatever.
I dared my mate to create a Cam4 account several years ago, and dance naked for strangers. He said he did it, but the crucial thing here was that there had to be proof, and this is where i told him to give us his username and tell us in advance when he would be doing it. He was all "nah, i don't want you seeing" to begin with, but since £120 was on offer to the guy who completed his 10 tasks first (6 of us each put in £20), he was persuaded to go ahead when we pointed out it wasn't like he would be seeing us watching, and what really helped was telling him that he didn't have to show his face on cam (and he didn't, a bit disappointing,), but he did it, and i got to see his whole body (well, from the upper legs upwards at least). Video quality wasn't great but it was well worth the plan. Poor guy didn't even win the challenge at the end, he couldn't do the bungy jump task. I didn't win either cos i had to do a streak through a shopping centre….fuck that lol.
Here is a tip, get the guy who does your dares, be the guy with the least imagination, the darestend to be less of a challenge, thats how the winner won, with dares that weren't that daring lol.

CCninja…I can't tell you how great it is to download the Quicktorrentmaker and upload some content. Not only is it dead easy, everything is pretty much done automaticlly (you just need to take screenshots to add in the pictures), but your ratio increases really quickly, plus you get given bonus points by some of the other members when they say thanks. I downloaded barely anything during the freeleech, and what i did were small files. I spent most of the time adding torrents and my seed ratio is now above 1.0. First time ever i have uploaded more than downloaded.
Maybe my uploading frenzy caused the issues lol. But just saying that is another (and really good) way that you can improve your ratio.

Haha okay. 

When i say thank you for a torrent, it shows maximum 250 torrent. Do i just have to thank more than once?