Posts made by Matie

Funny I've often seen a call for the eradication of religions on different forums without any squeals from the PC brigade. Oh but that's the eradication of all religions. The bloodshed that would involve would be incalculable.

I have seen the 'roaches' appellation elsewhere. This is the language of the alt-right. And mhorndisk, you sure you wouldn't like a room all by yourself?

I thought someone called Professor 'Sasy' said those things. Pretty sassy if you ask me

@flozen:

@raphjd:

If I started enforcing the rules in the way liberals want, you'd be crying on the help desk far more than you guys do now.

This feels very much like you're drawing an assumption, in the belief it absolves you from doing your job.  It doesn't.

@raphjd:

Oddly, liberals violate the rules as much, if not more, than the conservatives but complain about the rules not being followed/enforced almost exclusively.

This is observationally untrue, but since you made the claim, go ahead and share the method by which you can prove it.  Or, are we back to alternative facts?

I guess if he's the mod, he knows who's doing the complaining. Oh, and FAKE NEWS

Makes sense

I mean, 'religion of peace' is a fundamental misunderstanding of the Arabic word, 'Islam'.

BTW, I don't claim that Islam is a religion of peace. Actually that is a fundamental misunderstanding. I believe it means more correctly, 'submission'. Rather, Islam is (and always has been) a religion of 'pacification', that is, you can be treated 'peacefully' once you submit (become a Muslim) and become an adherent of Islam (submission). Or accept dhimmi status (only open to 'peoples of the book', and never gays)

Well, the boot could be on the other foot. Whenever the religion of pieces attacks the west or western targets, we are told 'not all Muslims'. I think on the whole westerners have shown remarkable restraint in not resorting to mob violence or tit for tat attacks. Is this the typical tu quoque argument, in that we find some outrage performed by non-muslims to justify islamic terrorism? There is no doubt that Islam exhibits cult like characteristics, and this is not just in regard to those commonly considered extremist.

But attacks on unarmed civilians are certainly deplorable. Whatever problems I may have with islamic ideology, I certainly condemn indiscriminate attacks on ordinary Muslims. I don't hate Muslims as individuals, nor do I hate the religion as such. I do have definite problems with fundamental aspects of the faith, and these extend beyond what is generally labelled 'extremist', and I feel that I do so totally justifiably.

I have no responsibility to defend Trump in any way shape or form and I disavow such.

Police are going to laugh at the notion of a man being sexually assaulted by a woman…double standards but that's the world we live in...

What what? He uses Jared's back channel? This thread is getting racier all the time

He was probably drunk or stoned at the time

The Orlando shooter was a gay Muslim.

I'm liberal and conservative. Also centrist. And non-aligned. But 'latte-lefties' get their knickers in a twist when anything is mentioned that is somewhat critical of Islam. Not Christianity, they abuse that viciously. It is like a veil of confusion descends whenever someone triggers a core tenet of 'tolerance', that is we must praise people from 'exotic' places. Perhaps in the hope of getting some exotic cock.

This is not specifically targeted at others in this thread, but I am speaking generally. I applaud the idea of respectful dialogue. Just that dialogue may naturally divert into places that some are uncomfortable with.

The Saudis sponsor more terrorism (at the moment) than the Iranians do

We should invite millions of muslims into the west, so long as it's not my neighbourhood. Certainly wherever they ghettoize (not in my neighbourhood) they will forbid any outward displays of 'western degeneracy'. But as I say, it won't be in my neighbourhood. Yes terrorist attacks will increase, but probably not amongst those of a shia background (a currently persecuted minority in many countries, unless they are in the majority and they persecute minorities). We must wear a badge of tolerance even if it leads to more deaths, especially of people not in my local area and social circle

It's like the old joke, women deserve equal rights…and lefts

No but seriously, if a woman is being physical, she should expect that a man can defend himself with force. Women generally are physically weaker, so one should never go overboard. A lot of domestic violence seems to have an alcohol component as well.

Christianity doesn't call for the murder of gays. Whilst the west is importing Muslims, more atrocities will occur. Because 'some people' insist that 'all faiths are the same', there can be no 'discrimination' in migrant intake, whereas blind freddy can tell you that certain types of migrants will commit more of certain types of crimes, ergo those of an islamic background are behind the phenomenal spike in mass killings in Europe. Yet for some, merely to identify this fact is 'islamophobia'

People are worried about the rise of militant Islam though, and not without reason. Open slather migration from islamic countries hasn't seemed to achieve anything useful, westerners are less secure, and strictish Muslims feel highly uncomfortable with western norms. I realize that Anglo-American foreign policy and military interventions have contributed to this, but it's fair to say that Islam is not a force for good anywhere on the planet. Realize I'm generalizing, but wherever Islam is entrenched,
1. Human rights are diminished, especially the rights of women and minorities
2. Weird repressions and abuses are evident, such as taboos on touching women in public, widespread molesting of young boys (e.g. bacha bazi), right to marry prepubescent girls (see 1)
3. General and inexplicable acts of terror, often against coreligionists.

Now whether or not American neocons 'get' the quran, certainly ISIS feel they do and can quote plenty of textual support in their favour…

Some on the extreme left hate anything to do with the establishment, and therefore like to see the introduction of a little anarchy. OTOH some on the extreme right seem to be rather militantly islamic in their worldviews (extreme conservatism, conspiracy theorist, totalitarian etc.)

@karashi:

Historically oppressed group wants equality, homocons object.
The cognitive dissonance must be deafening.

Equality feels like oppression when you've always been the oppressor.

Hey, we might be faggots but at least we're white males, amirite??

–
I don't see anything in the article that's particularly offensive.  In fact, most are common sense statements that boil down to "don't favor boys or make excuses based on their gender" and the last one is "celebrate boyhood".

White women have more than equality in most areas from my observation. Just try criticizing women in public, and you'll see who is the protected gender. On an unrelated note, have you heard of Carl the Cuck?