I voted for martini20's pic.
He posted the pic I was going to post.
Sick minds think alike >:D
I voted for martini20's pic.
He posted the pic I was going to post.
Sick minds think alike >:D
It's fascinating and mindblowing the resilience of life on this planet and undoubtably on others
I had not heard anything about this until I spotted it trending on twitter earlier today (complete with some quite inventive fisting puns). Even then, full details of what it was all about were hard to find. Here's the bbc's eventual report on it, with the explicit details missing:-
–------------------
A male escort accused of distributing obscene DVDs has been found not guilty by a jury at Southwark Crown Court. Michael Peacock, 53, was charged with six counts under the Obscene Publications Act after an undercover police officer bought DVDs from him. The films, which he had advertised for sale online, featured hardcore gay sex acts.
Mr Peacock's lawyer claimed the unanimous verdict might make police reluctant to prosecute in future. Mr Peacock, of Finsbury Park, north London, whom his lawyer described as a well-known member of the gay community, was charged after police sent an undercover officer to his house in January 2009 to buy the DVDs. Nigel Richardson, a lawyer with defence solicitors Hodge Jones and Allen, told the BBC: "Police were looking very closely at this case."
The jury had to decide if the DVDs would deprave and corrupt any person likely to read, see or hear it. Mr Richardson said that the jury decided the people likely to see the films were "gay men specifically asking for this type of material." He added: "The whole idea of something being depraved or corrupt is out-dated." The jury of men and women watched "large amounts [of the films over] several hours" during the trial, which began on Tuesday.
"Although they were quite shocked initially, they started to look quite bored very quickly," Mr Richardson said. The acts depicted in the films are not in themselves illegal. Mr Richardson's colleague Myles Jackman tweeted after the case that officers from SCD9, the Metropolitan Police unit dealing with human exploitation and organised crime, will "sit down with" the Crown Prosecution Service and the British Board of Film Classification "to review guidelines on obscenity".
Mr Jackman, writing at the start of the case, had said it was the "most significant in a decade". "This could be the final nail in the coffin for the Obscene Publications Act in the digital age because the jury's verdict shows that normal people view consensual adult pornography as a part of everyday life and are no longer shocked, depraved or corrupted by it," he said.
Mediawatch-UK, which campaigns against obscene material in the media, said the Obscene Publications Act needed to be tightened up. Its director Vivienne Pattison says the case "illustrates the problem" with the act. There is not a list which says what is obscene and what is not. It makes it incredibly difficult to get a conviction on that," she said. "As a society we are moving to a place where porn is considered as kind of fun between consenting adults, but porn is damaging.
–-----------------
Here is a link to a blog from the law firm who represented the defendent, it gives a detailed background to the case hxxp://obscenitylawyer.blogspot.com/2012/01/obscenity-trial-of-decade.html
MrMazda sir, your post is probably the most important offering there's been on this site. Thank you for taking the time to share your personal experiences, in that post and others you have contributed to on the subject
That made me laugh on a wet, dark morningÂ
The whole premise of these popular videos, a macho str8 type stud pounding a bottom aggressively, is a turn on. But for some reason there is rarely a close up of the big cock skewering the bottom. Just seems such a missed opportunity. Does anyone else find the lack of close up penetration shots bewildering?
The only thing she got right was that homosexuality has existed since the beginning of time.
That'll be about 6000 years ago then, around the time the dinosaurs didn't get the memo to head to the big Ark
I'm sure an International trial will take place, right after the Vatican renounces their absurd man-made doctrine against the use of condoms which is responsible for countless deaths thoughout the world, and just after I win the EuroMillions jackpot
Looks like I'll have to shag a dead cat in a cemetary to get a more respectable pervy score.
Phwoaaaar, I especially love the ripped jeans one, it ticks all the right boxes
Actually, I've just noticed that the couch he's lying on is the same one as his mate is lying on, so that cock pic is probably genuine. That knob is big enough soft, never mind hard ;D
It's probably the most horny form of wrestling there is, pouring olive oil on big hairy bodies, dressed only in leather trousers, grappling with each other and putting your hands down an opponent's crack is acceptable :cheesy2:
I do have a video of an annual kirkpinar tournament somewhere, I would need to do some conversion/editing though. In the meantime, youtube has alot of horny clips hxxp://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31MUIRhMkv8&feature=related (the traditional dancing at the beginning doesn't last long!) and there's plenty of related clips to explore … pure filth ;D
Following on from notquiteme's post about Stefan Solvi, here is my favourite lump of Strongman spunk. (do these guys counts as chubbies? Â ??? )
I love watching the gorgeous big Englishman. I'm not sure the last picture is genuine or someone's fantasy, but the site I found it on stated it was Terry rubbing his cock in his sleeping mate's head. Â :drool2:
Never heard of 'friendfeed' geographer, although I doubt it's what I think it isÂ
"Sam is not Frodo's unrequited gay lover."Â Yea riiiiiight
Can't disagree with any of that diagram Spintendo ;D.
It doesn't take long to spot some common traits of Twitter eg most people are obsessed with getting more and more followers, unfollowing someone gives you a nanosecond of incredible power, minor 'celebs' get their ego fix by tweeting things like "anything good on tv tonight?" or "whats the football score?" thus generating numerous responses from their fans.
I usually avoid these social networking things like the plague, to me, some things should remain private and not be broadcast to the world. But I started using Twitter mainly to follow various rugby players and purely for perving purposes. This did feel like I was a stalker, reading their banter between other players, soaking up titbits of smutty info, lusting at the pictures they posted. I'd make the occasional risque comment to them, and if you got a reply it was like gold dust. Gradually I started following my other interests, entertainers, sci-fi, politics etc, and sprouting words of drunken wisdom now and again. In other words I was getting hooked on Twitter and I had moved away from my original intentions, I had gone mainstream. :-[
Has anyone else got hooked on Twitter?