Posts made by LEVI

I remember a moderator telling a member that he could not reupload a torrent that was taken down by a DMCA notice. He said it was in the rules.

I have looked over the rules and the FAQ and cannot find this passage.

My question is I have a file I thought I uploaded, but cannot find under my torrents, maybe it was taken down with a DMCA, but I can't remember.

How are we to remember which files were taken down if they are deleted from the "My Torrents" page?

@danijelr15:

@eurostud29:

Cheating would be hard for me. So it depends on the wife: If she would encourage me to do it, then it would be a yes.

So if you WERE encouraged cheating would not be such a big problem for you after all? Yeah, sounds legit.

All this married guy thing kind of paints a sad personality picture of an insecure guy who lacks control over his life and in order to fulfill his wet dreams he must fill his family with lies and sneak out of the house. You could be as hot as you want, but this lifestyle is simply pathetic. Hurting other people for your own pleasure, how sad and little these people are. If you want to have sex with men don't go create a family. It's like building a house that you already know you don't want to live in. So basically, these men are stupid. Not having the ability to think ahead equals lack of intelligence.

I suppose having sex with stupid hot people can be a thrill, but watch out. You are who you hang out with. Do you really want to be stupid?

However, that is not what he is saying. Basically he is saying if the wife gave her permission then he would do it. Cheating in a marriage implies that one party of the marriage has no idea the other party is sleeping with other people.

I had that problem on a machine running MS Vista. Had to run as an administrator as well and even then sometimes I had to run it once and get the error, then close it out and run it again.

23 cm

@nordicblue:

If you are not attracted to another race, that does not make you racist.  In fact the amount of interracial marriages is extremely low according to the U.S. Census Bureau.
According to this table no one really likes marrying outside of their race that much.
               White Wife    Black Wife Asian Wife Other Wife
White Husband 50,410,000 168,000 529,000   487,000
Black Husband 390,000   4,072,000 39,000   66,000
Asian Husband 219,000   9,000      2,855,000 28,000
Other Husband 488,000   18,000      37,000   268,000

Just like you can be attracted to people from another race and still be a racist.

@raphjd:

Everyone has their "type" and there is nothing wrong with it.

Nothing wrong with it at all. It just depends on how a person goes about defining what he likes or doesn't like that is wrong. Just like the guys that only go off the photos and don't read the profile

It is on any site that men use. The guys are just trying to say what are their interests and likes and what turns them off. One day people might grow up and accept others for who they are and not what they look like.

Have a friend on A4A that contacted someone and just said that he enjoyed the others profile. The guy responded back that that he should not have contacted him because my friend is black and the guy was white. That kind of attitude has no place in the world

@Ripley:

I have discovered, even before of having sex, that rectum produces some sort of natural lubrication. I think the more stimulation you get, the more you lubricate. Even when I used my dildos when I was a teen, I used to self lubricate a lot. I don't know about you but I think it feels good. I even don't need any lub for getting fucked now, just my/his fingers. My recommendation would be to clean his penis and your external zones after a while, and learn the Kegel exercises, for you to have a more strong muscles in the ass. That would make you have more control over the tightness around his girth when you are having sex, no mater how lubricated you get.

Mmmm. come here.

I agree a man needs to learn to control his muscles and be able to tight his arse around a cock, to be able to squeeze that cock with his arse and make the top moan as it will drive the top wild.

Have done it in the past so the future would be no problem, besides they make great bottoms.

Yes, love seeing guys in boxers and boxer briefs. Give me something my imagination can grab onto.

James Jamesson with a full beard and non-shaved chest.

I have a friend who is just starting to explore his interest in men. He told be the difference between women and men are.

Women want to date first, then have sex.
Men want to have sex first, then date.

@thekingdom:

1. I don't think there's anything wrong with talking about sex
2. This is my general rule: if the date went well and I want to see the guy again, I avoid sex on the first date. I guess it's just my way of seeing whether he's serious or just in it for the sex. If, on the other hand, the date was just meh and I don't see the relationship going anywhere, I might have sex on the first date. Because if I'm not going to see him again I might as well have some fun.

Oh the possibilities.

Isn't it usually if a date goes well you are rewarded not if it goes bad.

@ryanbrian98:

test post picture


Crying Freeman

Graphic novel
Anime
and Major Movie

It could be just indicative of the type of porn that you watch. I am finding that many scenes and movies are moving back to the missionary position, which for me is one of my favorite positions to watch and I am always looking forward to the actors in that position.

@groovedware:

Lose them?  LOSE THEM?  Oh if only it were that easy!

As for super sensitive or not enjoying them, why can't it be both times 2?

Wanting pictures you say?  Hmmm, I can further expound on how sensitive they are by telling you they felt that.  Dammit!

I will not be performing an at home procedure either, hello!  I even have what some might call a high tolerance for pain.  I will likely need to be knocked out just to get to the hospital or they'll probably start bleeding sensing their imminent departure.

Sensitive scar tissue seems an acceptable trade off.  Scars are a bit of a kink for me, maybe a lot of a kink, they are sexier than tattoos to me.

You know there are video on Youtube you could watch.

@ThickDick8:

I think it should remain banned.  For me, it's a simple question of legality.  I'm not in support of the gaytorrent team making moral judgements on our behalf – but I do encourage them to make the most sound legal judgements they can for themselves.  Bottom line -- if the video depicts illegal behavior of any type, it shouldn't be allowed (based on the laws of the country governing gaytorrent.ru).  Drug use, beastiality, incest, REAL rape ... these and so many other things are already forbidden and should remain so. If a line needs to be drawn (and it DOES) then let it be dictated by the law.

Call me selfish if you must, but I happen to enjoy gaytorrent.ru and I'd hate for it to get in trouble or even hassled because of the content it features. The risk, IMHO, is unnecessary.

But incest is allow on the site. You even have the pseudo factual depiction of incest, rape, child molestation and all those are allowed.

@Riddler:

"Common decency" is more typified by general community assessment rather than being a personal subjective opinion.

A case in point:

Frequently, arguments about not censoring certain material are qualified with "as long as it's between consenting adults,"  but what if some users are sexually excited by non-consensual material such as pedophilia, bestiality, snuff, blood sport and torture?  Isn't this qualification of consent an infringement on censoring personal interests and therefore should be considered invalid?  I mean we could simply have these things labelled, right?  And allow others to chose to watch or not. . .

Certainly this does not involve an issue of legality.  If we relied on the legal precedent of protecting the rights of others in a non-consensual manner, torrents of IV drug use could be dismissed because of a near universal illegality of intravenously consumed substances.  So if not legally based, where is this qualification against non-consensual activities coming from if not from some collective assessment of "common decency"?

How is this non-consensual principle a justifying concept with the anti-censorship folks if it violates, at the same time, some users' personal interests, the predominant issue of anti-censorship?

Almost sounds like the slippery slope argument. If we allow this item then we will have to allow these items as well.

I don't think it is an issue of "consent" but more of one of morality. Pedophilia (which btw is not illegal), bestiality and snuff all have moral issues attached.

@raphjd:

Aren't these people being exploited, hence non consent, because of their addiction to IV drugs?

If we look at rape laws, intoxication quite often invalidates consent.

Our rules are already based on the "universal" non consent mandate.  We don't allow stuff that violates this; ie kiddie porn, bestiality, torture, etc.

The US generally has freedom of speech, but you can't scream "fire" in a crowed theater.   Freedom of speech, despite popular belief, doesn't apply to private property (such as homes and businesses).

As for allowing IV drug use videos, as long as they are labeled as such, after 8+ years of trying, we know that it will never happen.  We still get complaints from users about videos with no description, with invalid names, placed in the wrong category and pictures that have nothing to do with the video at all.

But who is to say that they are addicted to IV drugs. Now if these people are being exploited it still doesn't mean that there is non-consent.