btw, FACT:
that you (and/or ex-"President" Asshole, Tucker, Sean, Laura, Janine or Two Bookends & a Blonde) believe (or claim) something to be true does not qualify as "proven."
Posts made by kinkyrican
-
RE: Dem City Councilman, 5 Others Charged With Election Rigging In Race Decided By 1 Vote
-
RE: Dem City Councilman, 5 Others Charged With Election Rigging In Race Decided By 1 Vote
Did you read anything I wrote? Can you?
WHAT DID I SAY ABOUT HIS APPEARANCE?
QUOTE IT.Liars huh? Trump being the pillar of honesty right?
If you're so sure of your little stance, why so hostile and unnecessarily fucking nasty?
Most importantly:
Copy and paste what you believe to be my comment about looks. I'm so curious. -
RE: Dem City Councilman, 5 Others Charged With Election Rigging In Race Decided By 1 Vote
actually you derailed it by posting your link about your Afghani dancer boy diatribe before I even chimed in. I wanted to post my link as well.
As far as why I hate Trump - said posted link made my point, followed by my fairly specific comment:
"I DO hate Trump … and I could give you a chronological or alphabetical list as long as my arm as to why (spoiler alert: not one says “orange man bad.“) In fact my reasons don’t even consider his hideous appearance"
is pretty much the direct opposite of what you're claiming. I suppose that's par for the course though huh?It doesn't surprise me. You have no interest in reading anything but your own rhetoric as you type it. and as far as you ... I don't believe Ive hurled anything non-reactionary (Felicia sent me from the 90s) or just simply musings at the level of incendiary, hyperbolic Tucker Carlson parrotings. I also think perhaps you took my comments about your twice-impeached, single-term, incompetent, narcissistic, idiotic, loser, wannabe-dictator idol (see ... no appearance-related adjectives at all) personally and mistakenly believed I was referring to you. How positively Trumpean of you. He'd be so prou ... nah he wouldn't. Unless he does it, it's irrelevant to him.
If you're that sensitive or thin-skinned, perhaps stop drawing first blood my brutha. All of this perfectly illustrates my initial point about the inability to comprehend irony and that nasty nasty habit of projection.
I won't debate somebody if we can't agree on a basic set of facts and it's pretty clear ... change the channel once in a while. There's a whole world out there man.
-
RE: Dem City Councilman, 5 Others Charged With Election Rigging In Race Decided By 1 Vote
While I of course defer to irony's own veritable truffle hog, I'm not sure whether constant self-contradiction and the inability to make a true (or coherent) statement qualifies as such.
Case in point: when juxtaposed, do these documents qualify as ironic or are they simply two independent ramblings of an idiot? Glad you enjoyed the link though – he does make memory lane such fun. (Side Note: It's moving to know how concerned you all are about the safety of our Afghani brothers and sisters).
-
RE: Where's the liberal C-19 outrage?!
@raphjd you think a lot of things
-
RE: Dem City Councilman, 5 Others Charged With Election Rigging In Race Decided By 1 Vote
Well if we’re sharing links, I’d like to add my submission. America’s Biggest Loser
I DO hate Trump … and I could give you a chronological or alphabetical list as long as my arm as to why (spoiler alert: not one says “orange man bad.“) In fact my reasons don’t even consider his hideous appearance.But if you’re going to spend your days enflaming every single thread on the board (always a great look for an administrator), perhaps you might expand your repertoire beyond the same 4 talking “points.”
-
RE: Where's the liberal C-19 outrage?!
oh you're so witty. did you make that up all by yourself a quarter century ago?
-
RE: Where's the liberal C-19 outrage?!
I haven't claimed anything. I complimented someone's handling of another's nonsense. I never stated my affiliation nor addressed anyone besides @bi4smooth. Some folks don't even need to state it, I find typically that the blame projection game and complete absence of irony recognition is pretty automatically a guaranteed Trumper.
"YOU'RE a THIS, YOU'RE a THAT and YOU'RE NAME-CALLING."
I'm done. This got old before it began. -
RE: Where's the liberal C-19 outrage?!
@raphjd Yes that's exactly my point. Comes the dawn.
-
RE: Where's the liberal C-19 outrage?!
@bi4smooth It's not worth the energy debating a blowhard with no stance besides polarizing yours and enflaming. That personality characteristic was exactly what mutated the GOP into the fiasco that it is now. In my past experience, the following is sufficient and equivalent:
-
I know you are, but what am I?
-
I'm rubber, you're glue ...
-
etc
-
-
RE: Where's the liberal C-19 outrage?!
@bi4smooth said in Where's the liberal C-19 outrage?!:
Hmmm... let's see...
Someone lights a match...
You shout FIRE
I walked over and said: Yup, that's a match!
And now you're upset that I said "yup" instead of "FIRE! RUN FOR YOUR LIVES!"
I understand... but it's still just a match... fire, to be sure, just not the forest fire you want it to be!Your posts in this thread just might be the most sound argument and sane perspective I've heard a Republican voice since McCain died.
-
RE: How crazy is your porn/sex addiction?
A through I are completely different topics though. Its not possible to make one distinction and give less weight to the other 8 because they're such a wide spectrum. How could "I need to cum in someone's mouth," bear any relation to whether I go to a sex club or how many TBs of porn I have on a hard drive. Ya know? I actually could answer any one or all of them because they are all true at least some of the time.
Regarding how many times per day I jerk off … no less than 2, usually 3 or 4. On weekends, I don't really stop. I cum, take a break, eat and am at it again, either jerking off or hooking up. I believe the highest that I actually was able to count was 9.The key for me is cumming quickly the first time. If I don't then it just takes fucking forever. If I can get that first one out quickly, I can just keep going.