btw, FACT:
that you (and/or ex-"President" Asshole, Tucker, Sean, Laura, Janine or Two Bookends & a Blonde) believe (or claim) something to be true does not qualify as "proven."

Did you read anything I wrote? Can you?
WHAT DID I SAY ABOUT HIS APPEARANCE?
QUOTE IT.

Liars huh? Trump being the pillar of honesty right?

If you're so sure of your little stance, why so hostile and unnecessarily fucking nasty?

Most importantly:
Copy and paste what you believe to be my comment about looks. I'm so curious.

actually you derailed it by posting your link about your Afghani dancer boy diatribe before I even chimed in. I wanted to post my link as well.

As far as why I hate Trump - said posted link made my point, followed by my fairly specific comment:
"I DO hate Trump … and I could give you a chronological or alphabetical list as long as my arm as to why (spoiler alert: not one says “orange man bad.“) In fact my reasons don’t even consider his hideous appearance"
is pretty much the direct opposite of what you're claiming. I suppose that's par for the course though huh?

It doesn't surprise me. You have no interest in reading anything but your own rhetoric as you type it. and as far as you ... I don't believe Ive hurled anything non-reactionary (Felicia sent me from the 90s) or just simply musings at the level of incendiary, hyperbolic Tucker Carlson parrotings. I also think perhaps you took my comments about your twice-impeached, single-term, incompetent, narcissistic, idiotic, loser, wannabe-dictator idol (see ... no appearance-related adjectives at all) personally and mistakenly believed I was referring to you. How positively Trumpean of you. He'd be so prou ... nah he wouldn't. Unless he does it, it's irrelevant to him.

If you're that sensitive or thin-skinned, perhaps stop drawing first blood my brutha. All of this perfectly illustrates my initial point about the inability to comprehend irony and that nasty nasty habit of projection.

I won't debate somebody if we can't agree on a basic set of facts and it's pretty clear ... change the channel once in a while. There's a whole world out there man.

While I of course defer to irony's own veritable truffle hog, I'm not sure whether constant self-contradiction and the inability to make a true (or coherent) statement qualifies as such.

Case in point: when juxtaposed, do these documents qualify as ironic or are they simply two independent ramblings of an idiot? Glad you enjoyed the link though – he does make memory lane such fun. (Side Note: It's moving to know how concerned you all are about the safety of our Afghani brothers and sisters).

@raphjd you think a lot of things

Well if we’re sharing links, I’d like to add my submission. America’s Biggest Loser
I DO hate Trump … and I could give you a chronological or alphabetical list as long as my arm as to why (spoiler alert: not one says “orange man bad.“) In fact my reasons don’t even consider his hideous appearance.

But if you’re going to spend your days enflaming every single thread on the board (always a great look for an administrator), perhaps you might expand your repertoire beyond the same 4 talking “points.”

oh you're so witty. did you make that up all by yourself a quarter century ago?

I haven't claimed anything. I complimented someone's handling of another's nonsense. I never stated my affiliation nor addressed anyone besides @bi4smooth. Some folks don't even need to state it, I find typically that the blame projection game and complete absence of irony recognition is pretty automatically a guaranteed Trumper.

"YOU'RE a THIS, YOU'RE a THAT and YOU'RE NAME-CALLING."
I'm done. This got old before it began.

@raphjd Yes that's exactly my point. Comes the dawn.

@bi4smooth It's not worth the energy debating a blowhard with no stance besides polarizing yours and enflaming. That personality characteristic was exactly what mutated the GOP into the fiasco that it is now. In my past experience, the following is sufficient and equivalent:

• I know you are, but what am I?

• I'm rubber, you're glue ...

• etc