• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. Frederick
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 2
    • Topics 654
    • Posts 2497
    • Best 1
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 0

    Posts made by Frederick

    • RE: "Fire and Fury" book… great if you run out of toilet paper.

      @Shami94:

      Yes lots of people say the book is full of lies, errors, inconsistencies and fabrications. Interestingly none of them (including you) ever point to a specific example.

      Here's one set of examples:

      "To conclude that Trump knows nothing is a fact burned out of lies. I mean, to say he knows no Jack is a fact hard to explain/believe in the book. Much as Wolff tries to explain Trump’s ignorance of almost everything, the more he celebrates the cleverness of Trumpism. If we agree with Wolff that a dummy could make it to the White House then Wolf should be enlisted for a Presidential race. At least from his business, Trump was never sedated with his position in life hence his quest for more at all time.
      Trump might have stopped reading but he has started working, practicing what he knows and the more you practice the better you learn. Trump is always upping the challenge to do more and hence has spent more time facing challenges and crises as well. We can regard Trump as the most challenged man and unpredictable of this time but his survival strategy is a school to learn.
      Trump watches the best and most times makes the best out of them. Trump is a man always in a hurry— that is just Trump’s style. Wolff ended up supporting all these inert qualities of Trump in an attempt to say, “Trump knows no jack?”
      Under the heading “Trump Tower,” Wolff says Trump appears and knows nothing, and that Trump cannot even read a balance sheet: “Trump, the businessman, could not even read a balance sheet….” That all Trump knows seems to be someone who learnt it an hour ago and ready to forget it sooner.
      To cushion his argument, Wolff writes that Trump never wrote The Art of the Deal but his co-writer, Tony Schwartz did. Contrastively, Wolff latter argues that Piers Morgan, the British newspaperman said the “virtues” and “attractions” of Trump are all in the book—The Art of the Deal.
      Here is one of his contrastive positions: “If you wanted to know Trump, just read the book. But Trump had not written The Art of the Deal.” What an irony! Also, in a similar response, he quotes Sam Numberg’s position about Trump’s intelligence, “Is Trump a good person, an intelligent person, a capable person? asked Nunberg, Trump’s longest political aid. “I don’t even know. But I know he’s a star.” Then the question is: “What is the difference between a star and a genius?” Wolff needs to respond.
      Over Trump knowing no jack, Wolff’s Fire and Fury seems an attempt to lampoon and castigate in a bid to pull down but with the wrong attempt: it is a case where the critic contrastively makes the villain the hero and vice visa.
      There is no doubt that Wolff scores some points against Trump. One of such points (facts) revealed by Wolff is “The coming about of the Jewish agenda in Trump’s White House”. This is an area Wolff records a plus and deserves ovation. The public had wanted to know as well as understand what informed Trump’s White House in the disputed territory of Jerusalem. Through the book we get to know that this is done through Jared Kushner, the son-in-law to Trump.
      Kushner and his wife Ivanka control the White House to some extent and his link to the Jews shows a relentless interest in giving the Israeli State a long disputed territory. It was revealed that: “For Trump, giving Israel to Kushner was not only a test, it was a Jewish test: the president was singling him out for being Jewish, rewarding him for being Jewish, saddling him with an impossible hurdle for being Jewish— and, too, defaulting to… in the negotiating power of the Jews.”
      Not only that, we are brought to the know that in the Trump’s White House there is a conflict between the Jews and non-Jews as observed by Henry Kissinger about the White House. After the release of this book, it is believed that Trump should see to this Jewiphobia.
      In the book also, one of the facts Wolff reveals is that Trump is antiglobalist. However, is anything new about this fact? Several times, Trump has not only demonstrated it but voiced this as his philosophy: “America First”. His Presidential agenda is “America First”.
      For his America First dream, he has broken the Paris Climate Pact that puts over 194 countries on the brink. He has withdrawn from the Iran nuclear deal. He has accused China of obfuscating the U.S. economy, “that China is a front in the new cold war,” calling Russia the bad guy, viewing North Korea’s Kim Jong-un as an bomb ready to explode.
      These are some of the facts Wolff reveals in his book but these are already known and anyone close to the media, even outside the United States, can give more detailed account as well. These are issues already over-whipped and commonplace in the media.
      In the same vein, Wolff steals a lot from the public cesspool. Much as taking materials from public septic tank is not wrong, personalizing them as an investigative work might be misleading. About 60 per cent of what Wolff dredges up as his investigative effort are already lying in the public domain.
      On Trump taking his friends’ wives to bed, which is a tough thing to do is not supported by any investigative examples—they are mare talk going around in the public, which the author merely downloads into the book."

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Talk about insanity… read this gem from London's mayor Sadiq Khan

      @Shami94:

      Though it is actually spelt the "Labor" party, though I'd be crazy to expect you to know that.

      First of all, it's not SPELT, it's SPELLED..
      and of course.. it's spelled LABOUR not LABOR, you moron…
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Labour_Party_(UK)

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: "Fire and Fury" book… great if you run out of toilet paper.

      @Shami94:

      Trump's lawyers already tried to get the publishers to withdraw the book, but their legal threats were rejected because they failed to point out a single error. I'm sure the publishers will be ecstatic of Trump takes legal action. It will clearly fail and the publicity will result in even more book sales.

      You must sniff glue.
      Even the AUTHOR admits IN THE BOOK that it is loaded with several different versions of things.. including many contradictions.. and none of it can be corroborated.  No errors?

      Frankly, if that book had been silenced, people would assume that there was something significant in it.  Now that it has been released, we know it was all just a ruse to sell books.  What a load of manure.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: "Innocent until proven guilty" - is a joke

      @vaylon:

      Frederick, what you are talking about has been going on long before the news media started playing a part in it. In decades past, when something happened suspects were rounded up and the less desirable of them were most likely to be hung by community outrage. Thats why so many innocent young black men were killed in southern states during the civil rights era.
      The television news media had a strict code of ethics for a long time. Opinion pieces and hearsay were considered gossip.
      But then came the late 80's. Jerry Springer show was number one and fox news was launched that broke the mold. The began running opinions of experts as facts and news. Fox news started climbing in the polls and guess what? More and more stations started doing the same thing. Its all about the money.
      During the early 90's fox news was pretty much an exact copy of reading the Globe or National Inquirer. Not really news but tons of gossip and opinions. They really haven't changed to this day. The entire "pizza gate" sham was all on Fox's head. They were the first to run it and kept it up for weeks. With no proof or backup, just a unverified opinion and gossip. Much like the United Nations is taking over America stories they ran during the Clinton presidency.
      Today we have the internet that doesn't require any of that integrity. Today you can get the news slanted any way you want. Left, right, and everything else, served up just the way you like it.
      Today, the mere mention of gossip is almost enough to convict and ruin a persons life and career. Its the modern day weapon of choice of politicians. Destroy your opponent in the poll's and your good to go.

      One would hope that over time, with vastly improved methods of recording and transmitting information.. these disasters would no longer happen.  Sadly things are as bad as ever.

      In regards to news organizations,  CNN used to be the undisputed #1 source for accurate news, while Fox News was a joke.  Now the roles have REVERSED.  How did that happen?  I would prefer not to have my news slanted at all.  It would be nice if news organizations stuck to REPORTING the news.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: "Innocent until proven guilty" - is a joke

      @raphjd:

      The media is fucking evil when it comes to this kind of crap.

      A woman chef was murdered and the media pinned it on her elderly landlord because he looked odd.   Turns out it was the Danish guy in the flat below her.    The media destroyed the poor landlord.

      I'm really disgusted with the media taking anonymous claims and broadcasting them as if they are true.

      A couple of other examples of the media destroying lives… 
      #1  Richard Ricci.. accused and convicted of kidnapping and murdering a girl.. beaten to death in his cell by 2 detectives.. and months later the girl is found alive walking down the street with the family she ran away with. 
      #2  The "Olympic Park Bomber"  who later turned out to be some other guy who had a habit of blowing up abortion clinics. 
      #3  The anthrax postal letter guy.. who was harassed 24 hours a day and followed everywhere.. only to find out later that it was some scientist who committed suicide by jumping off a bridge.
      #4  In Florida.. in Gainseville.. this big "dopey" young guy was blamed for several murders on college campuses.. only to find out it was serial killer Danny Rolling.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: A new word for "censorship"… "prioritize"

      @raphjd:

      Facebook has admitted they bury news to suit their political agenda.

      As to the censorship thing, it could be argued that since they actively co-operate/participate in the government spying, that they are a government agent.  That would make them obligated to follow the 1st Amendment.

      I'm surprised people don't sue colleges for this.

      One day.. the Facebook balloon will burst.

      It amuses me that the moonbats defend Facebook.  Hmm.. gee I wonder why?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Don't go to skoo u foo! It's racist!

      @raphjd:

      Obama is a proven liar and the media kept silent.

      Obama said he would end no-bid contracts, but continued to use them.

      He said he would end GWB era spying on US citizens, but massively expanded the programs.

      The only thing Obama didn't lie about was him being born in Hawaii.

      One can debate where Obama was born.. (how would he know where he was born?)
      But what cannot be denied is that Obama was raised in muslim Indonesia by an Islamic cleric until the age of 13… and he didn't produce a birth certificate until forced to 1.5 years AFTER being elected president.. and the woman who certified his birth certificate mysteriously died in a plane crash 1 year after certifying that birth certificate.. when all other 20 people on the plane survived.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • A new word for "censorship"… "prioritize"

      There are people who say censorship on the part of Facebook is legal.  I don't agree, but even if you claim that is legal.. nobody can deny that Facebook exercises censorship on a massive scale.  Fart Fuckaburger likes to call it "prioritizing"

      https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/facebook-to-prioritize-news-from-high-quality-and-trustworthy-sources/ar-AAuUPiW?li=AA4Zoy&ocid=spartanntp

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: "Innocent until proven guilty" - is a joke

      @vaylon:

      Innocent until proven guilty has always been a joke. At no time in American history has that been true.
      But the case of which I think you are speaking has been judged by what the accused said in his police interview. That made him pretty much a murderer.
      Facts convict, not opinions.

      In the case I refer to, the guy did nothing but insist he did not do the crime when interviewed by the police.  20 months after the murder, his fraudulent attorney convinced him to pursue a fraudulent insanity plea, which requires one to not deny doing the crime.  Even then, they guy consistently pled "not guilty" and never confessed to anything.  The only thing he did was not DENY it.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Am I the only one that resents this? LGBT?

      @vaylon:

      I can't think of anyone who isn't part of a classification.

      Why do most Christian groups call each other Christian in Public but condemn and call each other satan and evil in private?

      People have different needs and desires regardless of their classifications. Nobody is the same as everyone else. Its what makes us individuals.

      But I do kind of agree with the LBQT thing. adding trans to the mix was the worst mistake the gay movement ever did. They have nothing in common .
      Most real trans people do the transition and become the person  and vanish into that life. They don't want to be seen or heard of as they were. Only the one's wanting attention are the one's who seem to show up and make fools of themselves.

      Yes.. but "real" trans people are very rare.  Although.. there are a percentage of genetic "male" babies born with penises that are so small that the doctors often do a bit of surgery to make that baby a female and are raised as a female.  Some babies born with micro penises are raised as males though - such as Brian.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Don't go to skoo u foo! It's racist!

      @vaylon:

      @Frederick:

      @mattb36469:

      Oh god, we quickly got onto Trump… quick someone change the subject...

      I can understand why people of opposing parties attack the leaders of the opposing parties in the time period leading up to an election.. but continuing to attack AFTER the election is something new - instigated by Hillary Clinton.  Obama is also doing this.  Bush, Romney, nor McCain criticized Obama at all.

      You are one special fucking snowflake. Obama was attacked more from the day he entered office than any president in modern history.
      Democrats need to play by the Republican playbook and do it to the letter. As long as they are the minority they have to be the party of NO.
      Republicans never once cared for the rule of order, th rule of law or any of that during Obama. Why should Democrats do any different. Especially considering that Trump is likely to be the first president in History that may not just get impeached but very well may get imprisoned.
      Trump offers no answers or proof in anything he says other than "Believe me". Did you take Obama at his word? Then why should anyone take the word of a proven liar.

      I had to read your comment several times to believe that you could post such garbage.  First of all a "snowflake" generally refers to a spineless malcontent liberal who bitches about everything. 
      Then, you said that Obama was attacked more than any other president?  WHAT?  He was not only given a "free pass" by everyone including the media… he was handed a Nobel Peace Prize for doing absolutely nothing!

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Am I the only one that resents this? LGBT?

      @raphjd:

      Let's not forget that there are different types of "trannies".

      Real "trannies" like Blair White and Skylar are normal people.

      Trans trenders are fucked in the head.

      The one's whose goal it is to look "normal" seem to do well.  Those are the ones we rarely hear about.  The one's that strive to be some sort of Barbie Doll freak are train wrecks.

      ugh-01.jpg
      ugh-02.jpg
      ugh-03.jpg
      ugh-04.jpg
      ugh-05.jpg
      ugh-06.jpg
      ugh-07.jpg
      ugh-08.jpg
      ugh-09.jpg

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Don't go to skoo u foo! It's racist!

      @mattb36469:

      Oh god, we quickly got onto Trump… quick someone change the subject...

      I can understand why people of opposing parties attack the leaders of the opposing parties in the time period leading up to an election.. but continuing to attack AFTER the election is something new - instigated by Hillary Clinton.  Obama is also doing this.  Bush, Romney, nor McCain criticized Obama at all.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: "Fire and Fury" book… great if you run out of toilet paper.

      @Shami94:

      I continue to be surprised at how illiterate American's are. I remember I had to look up "Borscht Belt" but in Wikipedia, not a dictionary, and I might have automatically skipped a very small number of unfamiliar words where the meaning was obvious from the context and auto-corrected any spelling errors (though I noticed Mediation where Meditation was obviously intended), but I had absolutely no problem reading this book.

      Of course it is well established that people dominated by evolutionary behavioural patterns, with lower intelligence, literacy and vocabulary and with a learning capacity that diminishes very rapidly with age tend to be political conservatives. I expect that the main target audience of the book (political progressives) will have no difficulty reading it.

      I read that the book is going to be filmed as a television series. They need to be quick because I doubt that the Trumpanzee will be around for long enough for it to be relevant.

      You are incredibly delusional.

      Trump will be around for a long time.  The success of that book is based upon the pre-sales.  Once people start reading that pile of crap, the sales will plummet.  There is something else to consider.  One cannot profit from the proceeds of a crime.  If Trump were to file charges of defamation, libel, slander against Wolff.. then Wolff would not make a penny off that book.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Does it bother you to watch porn movies which include actors who are deceased?

      @mattb36469:

      It doesn't really bother me, not something I really think about.

      I don't think it bothers most people.  I am just creeped out by people I know are no longer alive.  At my grandmother's funeral, they had an open casket viewing.  I refused to go up to see her.  I didn't want my memories of her to include the burned-in image of her lifeless body laying in that casket.

      posted in Chit Chat
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • Does it bother you to watch porn movies which include actors who are deceased?

      There are some porn stars who have been in a mega number of videos.. but have passed away in their 20's.  One example of that is Denis Reed.

      Does it bother you to watch scenes which include actors who have passed on?  It bothers me a lot.

      posted in Chit Chat
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Do you ever watch straight porn? What about lesbian porn?

      @bob85:

      To be honest… when I watch straight porn, I ALWAYS focus on the guy. I basically disregard the women in those videos because they do nothing for me. I have watched lesbian porn before, but I very rarely get aroused.

      Just curious about others on this site. Ever watch straight or lesbian porn? Strictly gay porn?

      I have noticed that in straight porn, even if the guy is very good looking, they barely show the guy's face and body at all. 
      However, in streaming live webcam sites, when they have a straight couple screwing and the guy is very attractive, the audience is mostly focused on the GUY! 
      I suspect that a lot of men watching "straight porn" are using it as an excuse to check out guys.

      posted in Chit Chat
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: Don't go to skoo u foo! It's racist!

      @Shami94:

      Oh amazing. You really don't get it.
      How do you distance yourself and your business from a failing Trump while keeping the revenue from your angry white conservative target market? Find someone else to blame Trump on.

      Who doesn't get what?
      You say Trump is failing?  Trump has already done far more than Sheik Obama did in 8 years.  One could build a whole lot of walls with that $10 trillion Obama pissed away and got nothing in return.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • Am I the only one that resents this? LGBT?

      I don't think anybody should be defined by their sexual urges.

      What's next?  The CSRR which are people that only like Chocolate, Strawberry, and Rocky Road ice cream?

      My interest in MALES is a trivial aspect of who I am.  But if labels must be applied, at least stick to GAY and not lump me in with lesbians and trannys.  Frankly, almost all women are a tad lesbian.. so that is an absurd term.  And trannys?  Trannys are usually fucked up in the head and nasty.. don't lump me in with them, thanks.

      Since trannies are almost all men who identify as women.. who are interested in men.. shouldn't trannies be lumped in with straight people?  Yes they should!  While we are at it.. bisexuals are by definition both straight and gay.. so why lump them in with the gay people?

      Heres a new group they should make..  SWPT    Straight, Womanizers, Pedophiles, Trans.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • RE: US Election System

      @erikiwi:

      what do you mean politicians are power mad? it's their job to enforce and implement party policies. sometimes they have to compromise with the opposition and in those cases neither side gets satisfied. but i mean, at least the western politicians arent as power mad as Putin lol. that man is not looking out for the best of his country or the russian people.

      Actually Putin has done a miraculous job of bringing Russia back after the collapse of the Soviet Union.

      There are some things that bother me about Putin if they are true.. such as helping out North Korea.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      Frederick
      Frederick
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 124
    • 125
    • 3 / 125