I have guided the debate, and gave you an out, which you took gratefully, cuz you can't handle this.
I’m doing fine thanks… still here... still happy to debate you. Just waiting for you to actually lead... which you claim to be doing.
So please: why did you say I don’t know what a democracy was? What were you trying to get to? Where do you want to go next?
Nothing will happen as even Nostradamus predicted. Trump wins. The idea that you guys are acting like nothing happened is ridiculous.
Right… so you can stop posting loads of stuff about Biden then, right? As the campaigning is over and your guy won, right? So nothing to fear and you can relax! Take it easy! Just laugh at all the rest of us who are asking you for evidence etc and wait - then laugh again when your guy doesn’t leave his office on the 20th of January.
So why are you here posting lots of irrelevant stuff then?
I'm 5. You know damn well Biden is the Communist Borg.
Ahhh! Well that explains a great deal.
And no, Biden isn’t communist. He’s more right wing than any of the right wing leaders in the U.K… so for him to overtake them... and go even further to the left to manage to get to the extreme of communism... would be impressive!
Soo what is it that you’re afraid is going to happen? You must be afraid something awful is going to happen to you under this Biden presidency to be acting this way? What is it?
What the fuck are you even talking about you stupid asshat? Nobody wants to be on the team of fucking losers.
Well, no, of course they don’t. Which is probably why you’re so angry and constantly calling people names…
Was there really anything significant in anything you just said? You're just trying to overwhelm me before I expose the real shit.
Yes, lots. Which is why I said it…
If you can’t understand it, I’ll try and explain it even more simply for you? No problem to do so.
No you stupid bitch. I am guiding the debate on socialism and on all sorts of shit. You're the one who isn't getting it.
Again with the childish name calling…
Look, if this is all a bit too much for you, why don’t you give it a rest and take a break? It would be good for you, I suspect. You seem to be struggling.
If you’re guiding the debate, do please guide it... atm you’ve asked me one question then called me stupid whilst proving you don’t know very much about the thing you’ve asked questions on... if that’s you’re idea of guiding, well... I’m sure glad you’re not a leader!
For the record then. You are not an authority on anything. It's great to have that on record, whoever you are, it will be known.
Wow you really have no idea how to think, do you?
I have significant knowledge in a few specialist areas which I’m happy to claim authority on, depending on whom I’m speaking to (there’s always people out there who will know more than I do!).
The stuff we’re talking about here though is so basic, everyone should know it… and it’s kind of worrying that you don’t. And saddening. I feel like the country has let you down - wherever you’re from.
I'm sorry but you're wrong and your comment is disputed as factually incorrect.
Again, when you want to be taken seriously, if you’re going to say someone is wrong… you need to explain why, in detail... not just claim they’re wrong.
Again... we’re not in pre-school any longer... we can do better...
Oh, man. You just showed that you don't really have any idea what's going on. Yes, Giulliani is in the Legislature, but… he's also been involved in the Court Process.... I'm sorry to tell you that you are not informed, but someone has to. It is more of a formality, but that's where the remedy lies.
Heh… and yet again you prove that you truly have no clue what’s going on... at the same time as claiming that someone else doesn’t. Amazing...
If you check a post I’ve just responded to you in another thread, I think you’ll find I’ve detailed everything for you there. 
Dear oh dear oh dear.
Try, if you’re at all able to, to not assume anything about people you’re speaking to. Judging by your rather poor record on doing so, it would be safest for you not to...
By the way, if you did actually have information I don’t (which so far you’ve never managed to show me), then the normal and sensible thing to do is to show that information. Only children claim they know more than someone else without evidence to support that claim... so I’m kind of hoping you’re not a child?! But do please correct me if I’m wrong!
Ok, we're all impressed with nothing, go ahead and present your case. You're not actually interested in debating the idea of socialism, which is what this is about, isn't it?
Ummm… well... I was under the impression we were talking about democracy here? Maybe you’ve confused the multiple threads? This one is where you’re supposed to be working out what a democracy is... but your definition of it is not really the definition of a democracy, so much as it’s the definition of one kind of democracy (majority rule). There are others...
I’m really not sure why you asked me what the definition of a democracy is... so... maybe you can explain to me where you were going with that?
Oh really? I thought you might be able to do that right now considering you claim to have absolute right of truth passport. Like you're the news. Who said you were the authority anyway?
Do please show me where I’ve made that claim?
Yea you just totally evaded the conversation you bitch.
If by evading you really mean asking you to determine why something is so I can sander you… then... sure...
Most people consider that the intelligent way of doing things. But... not you, apparently...
Please stop with the childish name calling. How old are you? 6?
I actually do take your posts very seriously. I'm ok if that makes you feel important.
I think your definition of Democracy is factually, and demonstrably incorrect, and what you're describing as a democracy, is in fact, populism. Demos, like Mars' moon, means fear.
Democracy means that the majority rules. That by definition, majority rule, means minorities are the losers. Black people, gay people, are minorities. Democracy, means that majority rules, and gays and black people are not majorities. You are so stupid I can't even finish explaining this to you. It's two wolves and one sheep deciding what's for dinner. It's 33 whites hanging one black. That is Democracy, you fucking idiots.
So now you’re calling me stupid… whilst proving to anyone who reads this that it is, indeed, you who are stupid...
Rule by the majority is indeed a possibility within a democracy... but it’s not the only one. At all. And if you knew anything, you would know that.
Unfortunately you’re just a perfect example of Dunning-Kruger: the less you know, the stronger you believe in you’re rightness and knowledge.
You know less than nothing about these topics. Please - please! - for your sake, stop posting. You are making yourself look truly stupid.
No it's not. And you're also not an authority on such things. What I said is absolutely the purpose of the Electoral College. So that Oklahoma doesn't have to be ruled by New York. It's very simple. Different people, different lives, different places, different economies, different votes. That is precisely why the people of Oklahoma or Kansas don't want to abolish the Electoral College. Deny it if you like, your opinion is not even a case or a defense.
Um… nope... it... literally... doesn’t do that. At all. Remove the electoral college tomorrow and you wouldn’t be ruled by New York any more than I would
How do you know so little about your democracy?!
It’s not my opinion either... as I said to you, look it up! Don’t believe me... go and look it up... literally anywhere!
Now look... I completely understand your fear. You’re worried that populations being larger in certain states means that the popular vote would always be with them... right? Well... that’s also what the electoral collage ensures (more populace states get more electoral college seats... it’s not a reverse correlation here...). So if you truly wanted a less populace state to have as much say as a more populated one... you would really need to get rid of the electoral college. And indeed change the entire nature of the US democracy...
Seriously... this stuff is school level information... why is it you don’t have it?
Could you give some examples from your own mouth of how Infowars was "wrong?" I don't like copy and paste from people, I'd like you're own understanding in cuneiform.
Sure! I’ll be happy to. If ok, I’ll do that tomorrow as I’ll want to dig out properly sourced information to support my claims for you.
Are you fucking kidding me? Give me and Raph, and maybe Furio, just one! LOL, I bet that would be appropriate, finally… We've been waiting for centuries it seems.
So you did read my post, right? Where I said I’m not giving you anything until you’ve defined the parameters?
So get on with it… I’m waiting...
Oh jeez nobody wants to read about you dripping with precum at the idea that you might be right. But you're still not providing anything at all really
Well no, that’s because it’s not down to me to provide you anything. That would be the logical fallacy of reversing the burden of proof again… if you remember me teaching you about that from before? Remember the chocolate teapot example I talked you through?
You’re the one making the claims - the burden of proof is on you.
No, Calatar. You avoided defining "Democracy." What does that word mean? What does it mean to you? We need to define our understanding before we continue our little debate. I don't think you came along for no reason, recently…
I happened upon a post of yours whilst looking for something else… or do you think I’m part of the conspiracy too?! Goodness me... are you really so very important that you think someone would take any time, at all, over trying to show you being a silly person on a random, private message board? You really are a conspiracy nutter, aren’t you?
Happy to define things as we understand them before proceeding. This is very sensible!
A democracy is: a system of governance where the control of that government rests with the entire population.
What’s your definition of democracy?
Dude. You got a lot to say, but it's based on a false premise. We know that cheating occured. We know it. It's a fact. I literally don't give a shit about what the corrupt court said. Like I told you already. We already knew this would go to the SCOTUS and that those minor court decisions would be appealed, 6 months ago… So
Oh dear… so now we’re going deeper down the rabbit hole are we? Really??? So now the courts are corrupt to... not just the voting, not just the electors... but now the courts too. So everyone is corrupt that doesn’t believe that Trump won? Is that the case?
Yeah yeah, the idea that Trump thinks he can win at SCOTUS is well known about... yawn. Already ready for that too...
But then, if they dismiss the case, they must be corrupt too... right?!
Nah, these are self-evident Truths. Everyone knows you guys flaut nations like Sweden and Norway but they're Capitalist. There has never been one God Damned example of a socialist program that succeeded or doesn't have a corrupt finish. You act like I'm not debating. I opened it up and you can't give any examples of one socialist thing that's good. It could be a program. It could be a country. It could be anything really but you just don't got shit do you????????
I have loads and loads and loads… but, I think we need to work out what on Earth you’re talking about first. Because I am not going to waste my time listing hundreds of examples if you’re going to make up some reason for them not being an example...
So... please give you’re full definition of what exactly is allowed as an example for what you think of as socialism and I’ll do my best to find examples of it (assuming of course that you actually can define it and your definition isn’t so made up that it’s no longer socialism you’re talking about...).
So please do, and then I’ll be happy to answer your question.