Hi family 
I found a link here :
hxxp://negritocaliente.blogspot.com/2010/12/pan-hanka-homo-erectus.html
As you will see, it says "Pan Hanka - Homo Erectus"
So I thought "Pan Hanka" could mean "Homo Erectus" ?
Google translates "Pan" by "Mister" … in Czech, good start !
Maybe "Hanka" means "Hunk"... Erectus 
Very hot you little devil >:D
I didn't see these pics for years but didn't forget him ;D
Now that we started this "jump on" thread, I have to let you know the following of our PM with xxx (who answered me just right now)
2nd PM from xxx to blackdid
HI!
Let's clear a few misunderstood. I'm not a new user, and i know the rules, ok?
I really made a mistake, offending you. I have been warned and my download-rights have been taken.
This doesnt mean that I act to harm you, or wanted to offend you, it was an act without thinking.
I'm sorry, ok? Its not an excuse for what happened, but I've already been punished. It was a big misunderstood. Won't happen again.
Like i said, I've gone through this before. A NEW upload, not an old, I started seed my file and a few moments later, appear 2 seeders with 100% complete. They already had the same file. I know what is it, i'm not stupid.
Sorry again, and i hope we can pass through this.
Merry Christmas for you too, and a happy new year.
My best regards.
xxx
I won't answer xxx anymore because one has to know when to stop a conversation, there's no need to make things get worse by arguing, which doesn't not mean I agree with him, because I don't.
Why is that ?
Because in his first PM he wrote : "Most of my files have been "jumped on" by a infinite number of members of GT"
And in his 2nd PM : "A NEW upload, not an old, I started seed my file and a few moments later, appear 2 seeders with 100% complete"
So you understand now, in his 2nd answer, that it happened to him already (to be "jumped on") but it probably happened a FEW times. Alas in his 1st PM he said he had been "jumped on" in MOST of his files by an INFINITE numbers of users, which seems impossible !!!
Who is going to believe that in "most of your new uploads" there are "infinite" users who already got the same file you started to upload and "jump on" your new uploads before 3-4 leechers completed a full download ?
His erroneous sentence in his 1st PM made me think he was mistaken and didn't know what "jump on" means etc…
Ok, he seems to be a nice guy, he apologized and wrote he "won't do it again"
I'm sorry his download rights have been disabled for a few days, but isn't it the only way for users to learn what to do and what not to do when they don't follow the rules ?
In case one day I do same "jump on" on anyone, I ask officially to be punished same way !
During my 32 uploads, I've been "jumped on" twice.
First time was in attached pics 1-2, when user zzz jumped on my fresh torrent : please note in pic 1 that my torrent hasn't been snatched (snatched = 0) and user zzz is a "jump on" seeder, also note the best leecher downloaded 63% of the torrent.
In pic 2, you'll notice the best leecher has downloaded 94% of the file and what are my stats ?
I hardly uploaded 288Mb (when the movie size is 549MB as shown in pic 1) :cry2:
And my "jump on" seeder zzz proudly uploaded 465MB
A few minutes later, many leechers had complete their download, which means I had been able to upload only 50% of my OWN movie (instead of 100% or more), because of jump-on seeder zzz 
Pic3 shows another problem and this is maybe what Mgr meant : this pic doesn't concern me at all but I found a "jump on" user while browsing in the torrent search window.
My question is : what are the options you have when you discover nadvertently the situation described in pic 3 ?
Though I don't like a lot options 2) and 3) because it seems to be a kind of "denunciation" (as named it Mgr) I don't like at all option 1) which is : "why should I do anything if it doesn't concern me ?"
Ok it doesn't concern you, but this guy you caught "jumping on" could one day jump on YOUR torrent, then you'll regret you hadn't done anything in time, when you caught him with proof, even if it didn't concern one of your torrent.
How do you want to get rid of "jump on" users if members who catch them in real-time don't alert Mods immediately ?
Guys, in case you have suggestions concerning this issue, please feel free to express your point of view.
Steve Hurley (aka Titpig) is HOT
I agree, he's incredible !!!
I like Mack too (a few years ago, he wished me twice a happy new year)
"Twice" means he sent his wishes one year, then next year he didn't forget to wish again, though he didn't hear of me the whole year !
@mgr:
…Of course you are right: jumping on a new upload is extremely unfair too!
Hi Mgr,
Thx for your concern, I know (and you wrote it) that you don't like at all this "jumping on" situation, same for all Mods here. I PM both users, and a kind Mod did same from helpdesk.
Mgr, in your answer, you're writing : "which mainly rely on "denunciation"
But denunciation is when you can't prove anything and you make something public by giving only names.
Now if you got the proof in your hand (as the attached pic you will find at the end of this message, though I greyed their both names because we're on the Forum) and if this proof goes to Admins and Mods (as I sent this pic to the helpdesk…with users names showing of course), it's not denunciation for me.
The only way to catch "jump on" users is in real time, while the torrent is uploaded until it has been snatched 3-4 times.
If the concerned uploader doesn't do it, who will do it and alert Mods ?
Because if nothing is done, a user who jumps on once will do it again and again : he doesn't prepare anything (the pics, description, torrent...) and takes all credit and ratio that was supposed to go to the original uploader, it is BAD
Mods don't have time to control from time to time the torrent search window, in case they find a new torrent with 2-3 seeders, when the Snatched column shows 0 : this could be a jump on torrent and it should be immediately controlled.
Anyway, before I paste here what I wrote in my PM to both "jump on" users, and the reply I got from one of them, I would like to say that something has to be done about this situation : personnaly I just did 2 tries to avoid this situation so no one will be able to "jump on" my future new torrents uploads. First try wasn't really successful but 2nd try was more promising : I feel that you won't like this 2nd method but if I have to keep on uploading torrents with a clear mind and not track jump-on users until my torrent has been snatched by 3-4 users, ending in deleting my own torrent after a few minutes because of jump-on users, then I'll use this 2nd method.
From blackdid to both "jump-on" users
Hi xxx,
Why you and yyy jump on my torrent after 5 min I start a new upload ?
[Alphamale] Pumped And Fucked (2010)
You force me to delete it immediately because I don't want you and yyy to take credit of my torrent.
Now I placed a message in the Forum, took a real time pic of your 2 names as "jump on" seeders and certainly Staff will ask me that pic.
It's not fair at all to jump on new uploads :
The RULE is : if you already got the movie (as you had) you can join as seeder only when there are 3-4 users who downloaded the movie totally (i.e. the original uploader, me, was able to upload at least a whole copy of the movie). If they are at least 3-4 who snatched the torrent and 3-4 seeders, then you can add yourself as seeder and jump on a torrent, in case you already got a full copy of the movie.
But with your jump-on (and yyy who did same as you), maybe in the end I upload 20% of the movie, and you 40% and yyy 40%, depending on our respective upload speed.
Especially my upload speed is maximum 28Kb/s !
I hope you understand the situation and never do it again
Thx
blackdid
Reply from user xxx to blackdid
Hi my dear friend.
Yes, i know the rules. Let me tell you two things:
My best regards.
xxx
2nd PM from blackdid to xxx
Hi xxx
Thx for your reply
Here are 2 links :
(here a link of the attached pic, but showing their both names)
You notice in the precedent pic that :
But you're mistaken in doing that because there are 2 very different situations :
What do you see in the pic ?
You see that ZERO users have snatched the torrent, which means that nobody has downloaded the movie from me at the moment the pic is taken !
In that case, you and yyy know exactly what you are doing (jumping on) when you add yourself as seeders, and this is very bad because you both will take all the credit instead of me (i.e you won't allow me to upload a full copy of the movie, which isn't acceptable at all)
(here a link of the thread we are now)
This is the Forum link I opened as I was so angry of this situation, you will see Mgr's anwer (he's one of the 2 Admins of the site) and though he can't technically stop it, he doesn't like this situation at all as you will read him
You write : "Most of my files have been "jumped on" by a infinite number of members of GT"
No I don't think so, what you mean is, after your downloaders have got their copy from your new upload, they start to seed it and you are many seeders : this is the NORMAL way in torrents, many seeders who seed the same file after they download it from the original uploader !!!
It happens with me all the time and it's 100% normal.
What is NOT normal, is to add yourself as seeder when there is ZERO snatcher like in the attached pic : this means you already had a full copy of the movie when you added yourself as seeder.
In case you want to do that, you have to verify how many persons SNATCHED the torrent ?
If you find there are 3-4 then you can add yourself as seeder because you will know that the original uploader was able to upload a full copy of his torrent to these 3-4 users, and probably in a few seconds there will be many other seeders (because other users have certainly downloaded already 97-98% of the file)
In case this is not very clear, don't hesitate to ask more or to reply in the Forum : all Mods or Mgr will confirm you what I wrote now
Merry Christmas xxx,
blackdid
Mgr, Mods, in case I wrote some wrong technical info to user xxx, please let us know so we'll improve our knowledge.
Thanks
Hi family
I find this situation a bit strange : a new film appears, for example [Alphamale] Pumped And Fucked (2010) as in my new upload, here :
http://tracker.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=92767
Here is a warning message I added in the description :
"Personal message : as seen in the very last description pic, this movie is a compilation of 4 scenes found in 4 other alphamale movies. In case you already got these 4 other movies, there's no need to download anything.
I wish alphamale displays this kind of message in a place where it's more visible, instead of displaying it at the end of the movie…"
So isn't it a bit strange that you don't find this kind of warning message on the studio site ?
Or maybe they don't want it to be clearer so many customers will buy the movie, thinking it's new material, when in fact all 4 scenes are already found in other movies.
Anyway, I prefer to warn clearly our downloaders, so they won't be surprised.
Gladly I watched the movie until the very last image, which allowed me to take a snapshot of the "warning" message, then add it to the description page.
Gee...I can't believe it !!!
We are THREE seeders after 5 minutes of upload, too much "jumping on" here... 
And they thank me, how great... Staff, in case you want to PM them and tell them it's very unfair, don't hesitate !
I deleted my torrent after 10 min of upload because i won't let those guys jump on my torrent after 5 min and take all credit for it
In case Staff wants a pic of the unauthorized seeders names, I took a snapshot before deleting the torrent (it's not the attached pic)
I just sent a PM to both of them, but really this "jump on" situation is not acceptable, a rule could be :
How do you want to go on uploading with a clear mind when this kind of things happen to you ?
Especially it's not the 1st time I catch in real time "jump-on" users on my own torrents
Ahhh titpig…everyone around him look so attentionate during the shootings.
Another big tits guy : Mack in the attached pic...
Thanks guys, you really have a place in my heart, each of you :love:
I was hoping this would happen ~ mgr is such a sweetheart !!!
Yes he is, definitely.
And so are you :hug:
You're welcome Michael, yes Axel is HOT, here is a non nude pic of him.
Btw, my blackdid account has been reactivated (thx Mgr !) :hug:
Bravo Rich, glad you made it
Hey guys, I found a way to display at same time the File list AND the Seeders/Leechers list of any torrent !
I don't think we could do it until now : depending on where we clicked, the description page displayed the File list OR the Seeders/Leechers list.
What about the following link ?
(Rich, it's your 1st your torrent link)
http://tracker.gaytorrent.ru/details.php?id=89980&filelist=1&dllist=1
As promised, your 20 SBP haven't been forgotten (in fact I gave you all my SBP as I won't need them anymore)
Don't forget, now you can exchange anytime 350SBP into 5GB upload traffic, that's good for your ratio.
Leatherbear (Michael) always creates incredible topics.
This site owes him so much for his passion
@mgr:
…I had times where it took me more than 4 weeks to download a complete DVD-DL from an uploader who had decided to seed only 2 hours a day...
Thx Mgr, it's always a great pleasure to read you
I guess "this uploader who decided to seed only 2 hours a day" wasn't here in GT, because rule #6 stipulates :
"Seeding times below 12 hrs a day are not acceptable for new uploads"
http://tracker.gaytorrent.ru/rules.php#102
Ahhh…the "impossible" word...Napoléon Bonaparte made it very short when he said : "Impossible n'est pas français"
He's the one that "created" that popular saying
Now Mgr, could you please explain me something concerning the "Average upload speed" (AUS) ?
You wrote this : "AUS : the reported upload speed of the complete time when you uploaded something (the reported upload traffic divided by the reported time to upload anything)"
But there's something strange in this explanation, because you calculate the AUS of a user, even when this user is NOT the only seeder of a torrent.
My point is, I would have liked you to calculate the AUS (or another AUS bis) only during the time when we are original uploaders, with our new torrents (and you stop calculating it as soon as there are 2 seeders or more in this new torrent)
If you did that for me, my AUS would indicate (more or less) 28KB/s (instead of 12.66 as shown now)
I can explain why my AUS shows 12.66 : for example this happens when I seed an "old" torrent in utorrent and let's say there are 1 or 2 leechers who will download from several seeders (including me) at same time : maybe I'll upload with a 4 or 5KB/s to one leecher (I see that a lot) because that leecher is downloading from 30 seeders at same time.
Now of course my AUS will drastically go low, it will be a combination of the times when I was the original uploader in my own new torrents (28KB/s) and the times when I seeded at 5KB/s during hours when we were several seeders with a couple of leechers in "old" torrents.
That's why when "you ask a user who wants to upload more than one (NEW) torrent at a time" (that's not for me lol), you should (imho) only calculate what was his AUS during all the times when he was the only seeder in his new torrents . This would be a more accurate indication for you if it was automatically calculated by GT
I understood very well the examples you gave in your precedent post, but please notice as you HAVE to ask a user a "speed test" so he can show you his maximum upload speed, in case he asks to upload 2 new torrents at same time.
My question is still the same : isn't it a possibility for you to calculate a 2nd AUS based only on times when the user was uploading his own torrents and was the only seeder ?
Send a photo, ok I have uploaded 3 to my profile. Is that what your talking about?
Hello Rich
Not sure I understand your "send a photo"
Only thing I asked from you was a link of your last uploaded torrent so I could thank you with 20 SBP in your torrent description page (it's the only place where I can send you Seed Bonus Points)
But you answered that you never uploaded anything until yet, so I'll just wait your 1st upload, then thank you with 20 SBP in your torrent description page, ok ?
Mgr will certainly answer tomorrow concerning this DVD possible issue, in case your upload speed is as low as mine.
But as you're talking about "200-900Mb" this should be ok, even if your upload speed is 30 KB/s
Could you please explain what you mean with this "send a photo" thing ?
Or were you talking about a part of the uploading process in the menu , when you're asked to "add pic to your description page" ?
And by the way, what client program do you use to manage your torrents ? utorrent or another one ?
Mods will certainly ask you the question sooner or later
@mgr:
Why bother to reduce the quality of a DVD by converting the DVD to an AVI file? Does only the size bother you and not the quality of the resulting video ???
Hi Mgr
Imho, Rich's (CableguyLive) upload speed is also an important point to consider, before he decides or not to upload a DVD (4.37GB) . What we see in the left column, under his avatar is : "Avg ULSpeed: Ø18.28 kB"
We know this "avg upload speed" can be discussed : for example, mine shows now "Ø12.66 kB" but I assure you that all my uploads (in new torrents, when I'm the only uploader +++) start at 28KB/s and end at 28KB/s (due to ISP)
So this "avg upload speed" seen under our avatars probably is…the average of :
Several weeks ago, I asked a Mod the following question (was Uwe the Mod ? not sure, though I could find the PM) :
"Hello Mod, what should be the maximum torrent size I could upload, when my maximum upload speed is 28KB/s, so leechers won't have to wait endlessly before they grab my torrent ?"
Mod's answer was (if I remember well) : "I think 1GB should be ok"
Though there is not a rule for that, I'll never upload a whole DVD (4.37GB) because it would take me nearly 2 days to upload the whole DVD content ! Are leechers ready for that and is it acceptable ?
Now back to Rich
He tells us "he never uploaded anything", so we don't know at all what will be his maximum upload speed when he will seed a new torrent. Rich, imho you should start your 1st upload with a smaller torrent (200-300MB) so you can analyze exactly what happens, as in the attached pics :
Let's see pic1 only : it's an upload made by our friend MrMazda a few days ago and pic 1 was taken while MrMazda was still the only seeder (it changed 3 minutes after in pic 2, but let's focus on pic 1 now). Important points in this pic 1 are :
With these infos, you are able to calculate why it took 10 hours for the 1st leecher to download 918.55MB
As MrMazda upload speed is 28Kb/s, this is equal to (approx) 100MB/h, which equals 1GB/10h
Now if MrMazda's torrent was a full DVD (4.37GB), and as his upload speed is 28KB/s (1GB/10h), it would require him 40h of uploading for 4GB, add the .37 and you're about 44-45h, nearly 2 days, which is hardly acceptable for leechers.
Just for info, pic 2 shows his torrent situation 3 min after : MrMazda is no more the only seeder at 4h56 : there are...59 seeders now ! All of them waited for MrMazda to upload the last parts of his torrent.
Rich, hope this will help you to understand better how this torrent thing works. You're writing " I'm new to the torrent sharing system but I'm learning", well let me assure you I was a total newbie too on july 31th 2010 when I joined GT, but with the help of all Mods, Admins, and some very kind and patient users, I was able to upload my torrents and understand (a little) torrent things I never heard about before.
Just be patient, read all you can in the Forum, rules and FAQ (not in that particular order lol) and never be afraid to ask ANY question, even if you find it silly, there will always someone who will be happy to help you
