@rayban099 "I'm going to reset the conversation on my side" - rather than apologize?
Remember: When you began you said people here lie & believe lies, wringed your hands how things got so far off topic (when YOU took them there), claimed to respect conservative ideals etc. - Concern Troll behavior.
As to your biography: Can't speak for anyone else - but I give it zero credence. Anonymous forum. Anyone cheater can pop up, any time, making any self-claim in hopes people will then treat him different or feel intimidated.
We've even had morons here who flail & self-contradict - as they claim to be respected English professors & lawyers.
Rise or fall on strength of what you want to say.....not by identity, biography & not by claims to "accredited information" or claims to what wonderful virtues you have in your own search for truth, that (you say) others lack.
When it comes to your good points (if any): "Show, don't tell."
& remember people can scroll up to what you said earlier
"But, the fraud wasn't determinative" <-- PURE CONJECTURE - from you
Ever-more powerful evidence of fraud has not been presented in court; cases always dismissed on technical grounds ie. prior to evidence phase.
Why should anyone believe your claims - when you rail against conjecture & conspiracy theory even as you do them ?