@raphjd Some great comments I seen. (not mine)
if libs are upset that George Santos lied about his backstory - just wait 'til they find out about Barack Obama!
Imagine being so delusional about the country you live in that you're outraged by George Santos
That second especially - yes Santos lied, yes it's awful, yes ideally he'd be gone, yes we said it - now can we look at the 19 jillion worse liars / lies that libs worship?
Glass. Houses.
@hubrys Hey genius. You painted Trump, Tulsi & Tucker as the good guys.
You sound like one of us.
So, Establishment GOP won't criticize this loser? RINOs won't do the right thing, often enough?
YEAH THAT'S THE POINT. WELCOME TO OUR WORLD.
In the USA it's called "America First" and rejects the "uniparty" Establishment. Similar movements in other countries.
You'll be voting Trump soon. While you're at it, a) carefully shred any traces of underage porn from your computer, b) think about joining Gays Against Groomers.
@drwas You can be hard to read. Maybe you're open-minded? You did put pro-Trump info here.
My answer when Santos came up earlier: https://community.gaytorrent.ru/topic/60762/ny-s-george-santos-did-russia-just-buy-a-house-of-representative-seat/3
@Drwas Fake news alert!
"Whitmer plot leader" was FBI agents such as Steven D'antuono, Richard Trask & others.
Likely acting to entrap, get headlines & create political narratives - pro-FBI, pro-Democrat or pro-lockdown, your guess.
At the moment, such articles are only permitted to say FBI agents were "investigating", BUT, at the various Whitmer trials, it came out that
D'antuono went on to DC office where, in the name of "investigating", he likely led the FBI assets-provocateurs of so-called "January 6".
In both cases - and prob others - the "violent extremism movement" was/is U.S. FBI.
How many years did they get?
But it's coming...slowly like a glacier.
@Rotron Nope! "Valid news sources" is subjective at best, but really authoritarian.
You can cram your "valid news sources". (Nothing personal.)
What we need to rely on is truth. Either something is real or it isn't.
When we disagree on what is real: that's debate.
You know... like a section called "Politics & Debate" 
It reaches no conclusions. It has no deciding authority. That'ss how it should be.
As things get aired or claimed or argued, lurkers draw their own conclusions.
But fuck authority, self-appointed "I'm the valid news source" and the rest.
I'm old enough to remember libs with bumper stickers Question Authority.
It's been a shock, this last decade, to see these libs turn into commie authoritarians - or at very least, Stockholm Syndrome mewling colorless pussies - just because covid and Orange Man Bad and muh gubmint check.
Embrace disagreement.
Both parties guilty.
Because in USA, party is almost meaningless.
A "uniparty" protects a bloated, corrupt technocracy.... which imposes fentanyl, poverty & rigged elections on its own people... and imposes covid vaxx, Woke-Trans & bombs on the rest of the world.
@Rotron I have to back out here. My general suggestion is folks keep observing & reporting until there is a pattern.
@raphjd oh yeah. The 20 yo explained his extortion plan on TV.
Interviewer asked if he shouldn't raise his price. He said, nah, $50k / a tesla is reasonable, he figures Elon might pay.
in Old Twitter employees sold/expedited the rare 'blue checks' for thousand$$. maybe corruption normal to some
@Rotron Fake news alert!
The tweet image you post - Somebody's fake.
Future reference, the fact that it sounds so "on the nose" (for lib fears / fever dreams) is a clue.
As to the rest: Elon imposed 2-day suspensions - nothing more - on accounts who DELIBERATELY broke KNOWN, PRE-EXISTING terms of service, in doxxing-out real-time assassination coordinates on children. (Who happened to be Elon's children.)
Ask any administrator on this site, what they think. (Seriously. I'm curious. I have a guess.)
And funny how Twitter libs not giving the least crap about children, became an issue yet again, that day.
It's.....oh I don't know.... thematic.
P.S. Supposing everything you posted was true...... in that case it's only how 10000s of conservatives were treated on Twitter for years..
Sucks if shoe is on the other foot even a bit, eh?
@cinemacapman In effect, your brain looks at the claim and says, That's unpossible! Reject reject!
People could mention interesting facts - like the fact that Oswald was a longtime CIA asset / had CIA handlers, the fact that JFK & CIA hated each other, the fact that CIA tightly hides key documents even now - but they wouldn't interest you.
A lot of issues like that nowadays.
And what strange bedfellows it makes.
We're in a world where gay libs disown the Kennedy family (RFK Jr boo!), while embracing Fauci (1980s AIDS / AZT "Dr Death") and the Dick Cheney family.
@eobox91103 ok I can't see a pattern.
Among those that vanished today:
This morning they happened to be on the main page, ie. recent & popular.
None of them struck me as "studio porn" or especially copyrighted / defended.
I opened their tabs, got called away, came back hours later, they had vanished.
Whose torrents benefit, by staying up, when other torrents are disappeared?
Is hypothetical Censor Karen protecting a particular uploader or porn studio, by killing the competition - killing anything else that grabs people's attention?
@MrMazda I do - but not as a pejorative. Might even be a compliment?
@eobox91103 said in Vanishing torrents ...:
some "activists" around who like to impose their preferences
Since you bring it up, I'll cite a few examples I've seen.
Remember it's "this should be OK" type of freeleeches, vanishing.
We can debate if people's erotic preferences are valid but....
Karen the Censor narrowing things for us, MORE than legally required, taking away the debate, is plain vandalism.
And Robert F. Kennedy Jr. agrees.
https://twitter.com/RobertKennedyJr/status/1604139690629730304
If it's true: So much for people who talk about "Our Democracy". 60 year coverup, ongoing.
@krad3434 Sounding like the key to this thing is Hall Monitor syndrome....some a self-appointed censor or two going "Oh I don't want that torrent to be popular - I'll DMCA it." Abusing the power.
Or??
@eobox91103 yes. I had a freeleech-out last week, where it was fine / didn't end up deleted.
To me, it seems to happen to about 1/3 of both my freeleech-outs and freeleeches that i download.
@forthepaul Fair viewpoint...... but just fyi.... yesterday i literally freeleeched an old, NOT bumped-up torrent....one that happened to be old & that's all, nothing else special about it....and this morning it was deleted.
Why do freeleeches seem bit by this, especially?
As seed points accumulate I like to "give back" by freeleeching things out for the community. Always picking things with
Next day, the thing I freeleeched out for people has vanished. Yesterday's good search no longer finds it. Not always...but more than once. & more recently.
Wtf? Am I the last to understand that freeleeching it out is a kiss of death / makes it a special target? & why would it?
Also it would sure be less mysterious if, instead of vanishing, the deactivated torrent stayed visible in a state like "Deactivated, reason xyz".
@raphjd Realized 1 more thing - why shouldn't a Russian oligarch (who btw might well OPPOSE Putin) own a House seat - when China, Big Pharma, the other drug cartels, & Ukraine oligarchs own like 400 House seats? Plus the U.S. Senate, media, presidency & DOJ?
All part of Clown World 2022 