Posts made by blablarg18

Another of "Dems think it's 2022 when USA peeps like Zelensky. But it isn't & they don;t"

It happens. "Not the first" sex offender to exploit Trans label.

https://www.radar.gaysagainstgroomers.com/post/trans-sex-offender-goes-on-locker-room-flashing-spree-exposes-genitals-to-several-young-girls

But are offenders like this, real Trans?

I'd argue, no.

Maybe they're Woke-Trans or Queer-Trans.

@raphjd Hmm. Who at FBI denied this FOIA release, I wonder?

Background. Audrey Hale, Trans mass murderer in 2023.

Story here seems to be:

• some at MNPD wanted to be open & transparent about Hale

• FBI often is - say, if mass shooter is White male. Rushes out their manifesto

• but in Hale's case, for some mysterious magical reason, FBI preferred info suppression. It took a year & many difficulties, for public to get Hale "Tranifesto"

• To make MNPD go along, FBI apparently sent rare memos to them

When asked for a copy of the [rarely-seen 2018 advice] memo that the FBI’s BAU-1 sent MNPD, the agency said the document “is not searchable in our indices,” and thus, the FOIA request could not be completed

Did old FBI management destroy info? as new management came in?

the memo originated within BAU-1, an obscure unit of the FBI that was dramatized on television’s “Criminal Minds.”

Does Tennessee Star hint that certain nasty libs at FBI destroyed memo recently to cover it up, and separately, are hooked up with Hollywood libs?

[new] FBI Director Kash Patel previously suggested it was his predecessor, former Director Chris Wray, who stood in the way of the release of both Hale’s manifesto and the client list belonging to deceased sex trafficker and financier Jeffrey Epstein...

“The FBI airmailed into that operation and said this is not getting out,” said Patel during a December 2023 interview. “All these local law enforcement agencies get funding from the DOJ and FBI for local programs, and if you don’t cooperate, you’re not getting your million dollars for this. That’s a lot of money to these local districts. That’s how they play the game..."

[Tennessee Star] sought an additional update shortly after Patel was confirmed to a 10-year stint as the FBI’s director but has yet to receive a response.

@raphjd I just wonder if @r3c3pt0r is someone's sockpuppet account?

OK, it's not really my business.....It just might be funny & in character - if some lib reads & cares so much, that they made fake account, for to proclaim they don't.

@raphjd Great point! Ukraine Regime is anti-Trans, in fact.

Study first published 2024 Aug 5; revised to please critics & re-dated to 2025 Feb 20

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11868741/

It's technical & complicated by data problems - but in brief:

Covid-vaxxed people in UK have higher all-cause mortality risk, than unvaxxed.

"All-cause mortality" by definition, includes heart problems, car accidents, strokes, cancer etc.

It's across all age groups, includes young people. Effect seen from 2021 on.

But why?

You could guess: maybe it was more of old, dumb or unhealthy people who had to get vaxxed to begin with? Nah. That can't be it.

You see, UK had big vaxx mandates, with big compliance across all demographics.

And yet, even young people ended up with higher all-cause mortality, after vaxx. As to dumb (accident-prone) or unhealthy people: vaxxers promised us repeatedly that vaxx "deniers" & "refusers" are dumb unhealthy ones

So....... ....... again.... ......why?

Another guess: As already shown in many other studies, covid vaxxes could be shit products with "adverse events" & other bad effects, for unlucky people.

Just a guess tho. Study authors call for more study.

The English all-cause and non-COVID-19 mortality data by vaccination status, released by the UK ONS [Office for National Statistics] for the 26 months from April 2021 to May 2023, were analyzed by age group and vaccination status. Our findings show that all-cause deaths SMRs [Standardized Mortality Ratio] were increasing in any of the age groups considered....

...the fact that all-cause mortality SMRs in vaccinated increase over time compared to those of unvaccinated requires further, urgent investigation.

...we hope that the ONS will resume the publication of the mortality data series by vaccination status, interrupted in May 2023, and that its example will be followed by other countries.

Moreover, the precautionary principle should suggest much greater caution in promoting extensive vaccination campaigns, pending the acquisition of valid explanations of the alarming phenomenon observed.

Trump to HELP Zelensky: more meat, for meat grinder.

https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-plans-revoke-legal-status-ukrainians-who-fled-us-sources-say-2025-03-06/

"Trump to revoke legal status for 240,000 Ukrainians as US steps up deportations"

Libs should cheer!

Libs hate migrants 1 time..... when it's -legal- Ukrainians who escaped meat grinder.

From lib viewpoint, it's weird that Biden-Kamabla ever let them in USA. Unless they were brought in to help Dem election fraud or something, but that failed.

Why do Dems & RINOs love illegal aliens, hate USA peeps?

video - https://x.com/i/status/1897330433697730676

Chicago: $574.5 million
Denver: $79.0 million
New York City: $6.9 BILLION
Boston: purposely doesn't track

Chicago dude tries to blame Texas - but Rep. Luna points out, it's he (Chicago dude) who welcomes them & defies USA-ICE on purpose:

video - https://x.com/i/status/1897360949834564070

@r3c3pt0r Way to bring in facts - NOT

"What Bernie says is 100% correct" - which I conceded.

"Nobody - NOBODY! - who is 150 years old or 200 years old or 300 years old is receiving Social Security checks."

Yes, Bernie.

You nailed it

Their checks probably go to younger people.

I know you libs can be slow, but.... Try to keep up. OK?

"Not gonna engage" - Too late. Try better next time!

@r3c3pt0r ......yet 'this person' blames Republicans often - or "The Uniparty" - & supports left-wing causes like Peace, Elections, Free Speech, Blacks having guns, & protection of Gay minors.

Odd, that.

Oh wait. Your comment, is what's odd.

Good luck. & thanks for reading which you just proved

Study is "new" - dated Feb 25, 2025.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39996623/

100,000+ patients

Aim: To evaluate mental health outcomes in transgender individuals with gender dysphoria who have undergone gender-affirming surgery, stratified by gender and time since surgery.

Methods: This retrospective study utilized the TriNetX database, analyzing U.S. patients aged ≥18 with gender dysphoria (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ICD-10] F64) between June 2014 and June 2024. Six cohorts were created based on gender and surgery status: Cohorts A-D included patients with or without surgery, and Cohorts E-F allowed for gender comparison among those with surgery. Propensity score matching controlled for age, race, and ethnicity. Mental health outcomes included depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, substance use disorder, and body dysmorphic disorder, assessed over two years post-surgery using clinician-verified ICD-10 codes. Body dysmorphic disorder (BDD) was analyzed separately and not conflated with gender dysphoria cohorts to ensure the distinction between these conditions. Statistical analysis employed risk ratios, with P < 0.05 deemed significant.

Outcomes: Primary outcomes were differences in mental health disorders, specifically depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, body-dysmorphic disorder, and substance use disorder, among transgender individuals' post-surgery.

What results?

First - I highlighted their phrase, "assessed over two years post-surgery".

They looked at what happens after surgery - Up to 2 years.

"Clinician-verified ICD 10 codes" means that, ordinarily, or majority of the time, patient, clinician, & clinic or insurance provider were able to agree on what happened after.

Results: From 107 583 patients, matched cohorts demonstrated that those undergoing [sic; those who underwent] surgery were at significantly higher risk for depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, and substance use disorders than those without surgery. [Biological] Males with surgery showed a higher prevalence of depression (25.4% vs. 11.5%, RR 2.203, P < 0.0001) and anxiety (12.8% vs. 2.6%, RR 4.882, P < 0.0001). [Biological] Females exhibited similar trends, with elevated depression (22.9% vs. 14.6%, RR 1.563, P < 0.0001) and anxiety (10.5% vs. 7.1%, RR 1.478, P < 0.0001). Feminizing individuals demonstrated particularly high risk for depression (RR 1.783, P = 0.0298) and substance use disorders (RR 1.284, P < 0.0001).

Post-surgery, "significantly higher risk for depression, anxiety, suicidal ideation, and substance use disorders".

"Conclusion" section, is where they throw in some verbiage that activists & hospital corporations would want:

Clinical implications: Findings suggest the necessity for gender-sensitive mental health support following gender-affirming surgery to address post-surgical psychological risks.

Strengths and limitations: By leveraging ICD-10 codes, we provide a more accurate representation of patient demographics and clinical outcomes, minimizing recall and reporting biases that often limit survey-based research. Limitations include the inability to account for unmeasured confounders such as social support.

Conclusion: Gender-affirming surgery, while beneficial in affirming gender identity, is associated with increased risk of mental health issues, underscoring the need for ongoing, gender-sensitive mental health support for transgender individuals' post-surgery.

I call it verbiage because it assumes (rather than shows or proves) that surgery HAD TO be the right move & surgery's worse outcomes MUST merely be lack of "ongoing mental health support" or "social support".

In other words: They appear to not consider that surgery could be wrong move.

To contemplate that surgery never should have been done, would go against revenue interests of insurance corporations & large hospital corporations.

But here is the undeniable part - undeniable from their own data, given earlier:

Surgery often either leaves people mentally & emotionally worse off, or at least, achieves no improvement.

In his speech last night, President Trump mentioned that USA "Social Security" benefits database, has open records for millions of people over age 130. 1 even at age 360.

Sen. Bernie Sanders responds brilliantly

"Nobody - NOBODY! - who is 150 years old or 200 years old or 300 years old is receiving Social Security checks."

Yes, Bernie.

You nailed it

Their checks probably go to younger people.

Living people, maybe?

video - https://x.com/i/status/1897136668228116882

@qvamp Do you ask me to dumb it down?

But it's self-explanatory.

In 6 weeks, President Trump has done some huge new hits against human & drug trafficking cartels.

His predecessors, Bush-Cheney-Obama-Biden-Kamabla, could have. & didn't

They didn't want to.

& why wouldn't they want to? Makes ya think.

"That Look". ifk,yk

Bonus: 22 Dem Senators read same script.

SAME. CRINGEY. SCRIPT.

video - https://x.com/i/status/1896965590788829288

Again: Bush-Cheney-Obama-Biden-Kamabla, did not want to stop trafficking of either humans or drugs.

They could have.

https://www.foxnews.com/us/feds-bust-massive-alleged-guatemalan-human-smuggling-ring-operating-out-california

Feds bust massive alleged Guatemalan human smuggling ring operating out of California

Operation ringleader is accused of moving 20,000 illegal immigrants into the US from Guatemala for up to $18K per person

"Up to $18k per person"... But say it averaged $10K...... times 20K people, makes $200 million.

What USA officials were paid off?

How much?

@raphjd Felony cyberstalking? Wow.

At least she didn't fire live rounds like Audrey Hale.

But what is it with these people & Christian schools in Tennessee?

@raphjd Radical Muslims get special privileges to undermine law & order....again.

Lib writer wants libs to GoFundMe.

YES! I approve.

Ideally, sign themselves up for AFU front lines too. (Not Azov)

https://x.com/donwinslow/status/1896722765123883129

In the last 6 weeks, President Trump has

• declared drug cartels, terrorist organizations

• cut illegal aliens at border, 95%

• arrested hundreds of cartel operatives. dozens at a time

• gotten Mexico to extradite dozens

• gotten Mexico to do their own mass crackdowns

• confiscated huge amounts of fentanyl, coke & meth

• shut down labs

But it was always possible to do that.

Bush-Cheney-Obama-Biden-Kamabla simply did not want to.

Makes ya think

@cp2000 Oh please. Projection, much?

YOU clearly "give a shit" & "try hard" to tell me, stop.

You have EVERY right to say whatever...... & I get to laugh

You have not added information to the topic; only called me names. That is "desperate". And allowed. Keep going!