@Spintendo You defended Big Pharma, Big Hospital, Big Trans with the "cloud of words" that left-wing philosophers say is how Power deceives The People.
Congratulations.
Also congrats for misunderstanding my point in another thread, about Shoot The Messenger.
Suppose I (messenger) say "It's raining" (content).
The fact that I (messenger) said it, has -no bearing- on whether it (content) is true.
Either it's raining or it isn't. Horrible as you may find me, -I am irrelevant- as to whether it's raining in fact.
Of course, if topic is cookie recipes, my content "It's raining" is itself irrelevant even if it is factual.
So question is NEVER "Where did content come from", but always 2,
- is content factual
- is content on-topic
Now suppose I (messenger) say "Trans lobby typically suppresses countervailing evidence by terrorizing any scientists who might generate or spread it, leading to a cascade of bad pro-Trans 'studies' in public discussion." (content).
Again: The 2 questions are
- is content factual
- is content on topic
When we're discussing cookie recipes and you say "The one from NY Post was funded by Macedonians!!", you're saying something irrelevant - even if factual.
When we're discussing Trans and I mention how systemically one-sided Trans "science" is, I'm saying something very on topic. ONLY REMAINING question is, whether my statement was factual.
See the difference?
Shooting The Messenger is: attacking a messenger / source of content -for reasons so off topic, they obscure- what the topic & content even are.
And that's its purpose, no? People who do it are hand-waving, saying "Don't look there, look here!"
Like when Hillary was caught keeping 30,000 classified documents in her bathroom server, cheating Bernie Sanders out of his delegate wins & destroying evidence - so yall libs said "Russssshiiaaa!"
Like that.
Yall da queens. Can't touch ur crowns.
Back on topic:
