New details allege Dirty Fani "cohabitated" with Nathan Wade & fucked him long before she hired him, despite her denials of both - ie. if true, she lied on top of all.
https://twitter.com/Techno_Fog/status/1754602660030718073
But what I care about here is still just:
new USA "border bill" has $60b for Ukraine. Libs - Do you really not see it's money laundering?
Again: USA already has border laws. Problem is Biden.
BOTH PARTIES CARE MORE ABOUT UKRAINE (MONEY) THAN USA.
entire US Marine Corps budget is only $54b
Looks like he'll get over 80%.
"Wildly popular, Bukele has campaigned on the success of his security strategy under which authorities suspended civil liberties to arrest more than 75,000 Salvadorans without charges. The detentions led to a sharp decline in nationwide murder rates and fundamentally altered a country of 6.3 million people that was once among the world's most dangerous."
Wildly popular.
Most people would rather not get murdered, as their corrupt government abandons basic law & order, & their youth coat their faces & necks in neo-satanist tattoos.
Who knew?
So funny. Wapo weighs in. (you lib "FACT CHECKERS" take note)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/style/2024/02/04/taylor-swift-joe-biden-2024-endorsement-question/
Thursday, in a not-quite dive bar on the east side of Capitol Hill, five Democratic staffers crammed into a leather booth with beers and white wines to discuss [Taylor]...
After nearly 90 minutes, one dared to wonder aloud if Taylor’s relationship with her football-playing boyfriend, Travis Kelce, was, in fact, a publicity stunt. The others screamed...
The women belong to the Hill Swifties, a group chat of congressional worker bees who...sneak[] Swift references into their bosses’ press releases...
...it’s easy to appropriate Swiftisms poorly in Washington. The State Department’s ‘Eras Tour’-themed checklist for international travel? That was good. The FBI’s tip line tweet cloaked in the aesthetics of Swift’s album “Speak Now?" Not so good.
“Thank goodness we have Taylor Swift,” one Hill Swiftie joked about her obsession with the pop star, “otherwise I wonder if I’d be into QAnon.”
Joke is on her. She just outed herself, correctly, as groupie nutjob desperate for something to worship.
It’s an especially heady time for Swifties in Washington. Her latest appearance at one of Kelce’s games — a playoff win that sent his team to the Super Bowl — coincided with murmurs that President Biden’s campaign may be courting her ...
On the left: open thirsting for Swift...
& On Right: they have a campaign of ridicule now to say Taylor should be made Snow Queen of White History Month. 
Righties praise her music as "whitest ever", say all Whites must now Center their Whiteness on Taylor Swift, etc.
All meant as sarcasm. Wapo ignores it. Because it's hilarious ie. too effective
On a day that music manager Scooter Braun visited the White House, former Biden communications director Kate Bedingfield found herself inadvertently briefing the president about Swift’s bad blood with Braun...
An unequivocal endorsement for Biden’s reelection from Swift could matter, says Bedingfield...
Bidenworld has been inundated with suggestions for how to try to make a Swift endorsement happen...
Marquee names mattered a lot to Biden in 2020, a year when nearly all of the campaigning had been done virtually.
FACT CHECK: THREE PINOCCHIOS.
Biden was shitty candidate. He couldn't draw a crowd of 20. So he had to "campaign virtually" - but Trump did rally after rally after rally of 30,000+ people.
Anyway...
The 2024 campaign will have a different feel, and particular types of celebrities will be called upon for every reason, every season. The campaign surrogate operation, for instance, is keeping tabs on hip-hop artists in Atlanta, and lists of bands that are influential in Wisconsin...Big names like Swift will be called upon, the campaign hopes...
As for the coveted Swift endorsement, some Democratic Swifties are nervous about all the members of their party who are talking explicitly about wanting the pop star to boost Biden — and whether if it’s cool that they’ve said all that.
Hey libs: Indeed your thirst is cringe.
“I don’t want us to overdo it,” says Annie Wu Henry, who, as a social media producer for Democrat John Fetterman’s 2022 campaign for Senate in Pennsylvania, leaned on Swift references...
Too late Annie!
Remember libs: This all in Wapo. You MUST believe Wapo. Programmer commands you.
Not sure when this was, but - teacher de-programs someone on camera.
https://twitter.com/i/status/1753702517765021907
It's a minor question - is JK Rowling transphobic? How can you say that? - but everyone starts somewhere.
@raphjd It seems that powerful wealthy interests - whether China, cartels, lib billionaire wives, or whatever - take over one conservative media asset after another.
Which is why people like Tucker, James OKeefe, founders of Truth Social or Rumble, keep moving on - to found new assets.
Again: Regime media GUSHED with hope that a Taylor Op saves Criminal Biden.
Just for proof:
![taylor-swift-person-of-the-year-cat[1].jpg](/assets/uploads/files/1707062679508-taylor-swift-person-of-the-year-cat-1-resized.jpg)
Now that people make fun of Taylor Op: Regime media says no way, they never, & people making fun are evil kooks.
Re: Gen Milley - I want to note that Kash Patel has given a different story.
Kash says, when he was at DoD in final days of Trump's first term, he doesn't remember Milley blocking National Guard troops, doesn't think Milley would have had any "operational authority" to do it, and does remember Pelosi and Muriel Bowser said NO to National Guard - until after J6 damage was done. "Pelosi was making a movie"
So for now, Milley angle is Kash's word vs. Col. Earl G. Matthews' word, and I don't feel it settled.
As to "Fact Checker", the very title means "Propagandist".
Title's user asserts, with crudeness of 10-year old Hall Monitor who grants herself PhD, that she is so smarts you have no choice but to believe her ultra smartness.
Because "Fact Checker doing Fact Check" and she said so.
Fuck that.
So pompous & fake. Such a bad way to begin anything.
@raphjd Indeed. Omar's own party line.
"Fact check'" means it's propaganda for dolts. You have a great thread about it.
When article labels itself as "Fact check", writer may as well be saying "Look how smarts I are!!"
It's Credentialism / Authority games, done with mentally- retarded crudeness. Children who grant themselves PhDs.
But hey if libs like it - should I start?
Meanwhile let's go to where this thread started.
Guy has DNA evidence that Omar & her second husband are siblings
right when he's about to publish, incredible timing, USA FBI raids him hard
Omar in MULTIPLE SPEECHES declares her allegiance to Somalia & Islam.
@hubrys If you don't care - That's on you. Don't flail tho. Don't keep underlining how you do care.
Wapo makes it official: "Fani Willis admits relationship with prosecutor on Trump Georgia case"
"Willis...said there was no evidence that the relationship between her and special prosecutor Nathan Wade had prejudiced [their Trump vendetta]."
But of course.
Even Wade & Dirty Fani would be smart enough to -NOT- write such memo, "Let's get Orange Man together! and be corrupt!"
This is where Climate Hoax gets us all. "No farmers, no food"
Ukraine angle - EU regulates its farmers to death eg. pesticides......... imports cheap food from Ukraine where regulations don't apply..... & votes ANOTHER €50bn for Ukraine oligarchs to loot.
(ad 3:20 - 5:05 can be skipped)
"Hit send next time and change up the font once in a while," one X user wrote.
https://thepostmillennial.com/nikki-haley-shares-obviously-fake-anti-trump-fan-mail
On left: each "handwritten" letter is identical - computer font.
On right: Nikki's office wrote it to themselves - forgot to press Send.
Dirty Fani in 2020: "Right now what you have is a office of dysfunction & corruption, & we deserve better.....[people] deserve a DA that won't have sex with his employees... won't put money in his own pocket."
https://twitter.com/mazemoore/status/1752887802146984090
PS. No lib dares show face in this thread & it speaks volumes.
They have a little option popup for seeing child abuse material?
Cruz displayed a poster of the warning message users are greeted with if they search for child abuse material on Instagram, which read, "these results may contain images of child sexual abuse."
Users are given two options: get resources or "see results anyways."
"Mr. Zuckerberg, what the hell were you thinking?" Cruz asked.
Zuckerberg attempted to say that the "science" behind the decision "is that when people are searching for something that is problematic, it's often helpful to, rather than just blocking it to help direct them towards something that could be helpful for getting them to get help." [ed: which Instagram does NOT do]
"In what sane universe is there a link for see results anyway?" Cruz demanded to know.
Zuckerberg said this was because "we might be wrong" in triggering the warning. [ed: excuse 2, since 1 was so lame]
Cruz demanded to know how many times the warning screen was displayed, but Zuckerberg said he didn’t know off the top of his head. Cruz noted that in a June 2023 oversight letter to Meta, the company refused to answer the same question.
Cruz asked whether Zuckerberg would answer that question within five days, to which Zuckerberg said "we will follow up on that."
"Is that a yes? Not a 'will follow up.' I know how lawyers write statements, saying we're not going to answer. Will you tell us how many times this warning screen was displayed? Yes or no?"
Zuckerberg responded that he would personally look into the matter, to which Cruz said "okay, so you’re refusing to answer."
"Let me ask you this. How many times did an Instagram user who got this warning that you're seeing images of child sexual abuse, how many times did that user click on see results anyway, I want to see that," Cruz asked.
Zuckerberg said he wasn’t sure if the company stored that data, but he would look into it.
Note: Online companies store that data 100%...... unless they strongly prefer not to.
Jonathan Turley gives ins & outs - so to speak - of possible charges, it's weird Aidan didn't even get misdemeanor for trespass or misuse of property.
Maese-Czeropski was . . . well . . . less forthcoming with police in interviews than he was with his partner on film. The police confirmed that “the Congressional staffer, who has since resigned from his job, exercised his Fifth Amendment right to remain silent and refused to talk to us.”
LA "True Journalists" 
climate hoax & race hoax, too bad new piece only hits one.
