@raphjd Never complimented you on this article. Here goes. I agree with main point, though not with all side points.
Sodom was derived from the Hebrew word "S'dom," which means "burnt."
That's interesting because "faggot" has a meaning of "A bundle of sticks and branches bound together" - that you throw on a fire ie. burnt.
Various stories say how "faggot" came to mean "sexually subordinate male" but I figure it's another time homophobes connected gay bottoms to Sodom.
Why is it that we are told that the bible is an accurate written copy of the precise oral tradition when they can't even remember the actual names of the 2 cities?!
Easy to explain: the disaster made an impression. Bible has many times when something is renamed after big event; and sometimes, old name forgotten or left out.
bring them out so they could "know" them. Unfortunately, we have no way of knowing exactly what "know" means in this situation
To me, "interrogate" them - like "get to know them, with undertone of suspicion & questions, potential violence" - is most natural & plausible reading.
No where does it say what the sex of the angels are
That's interesting. Bible usually represents angels as male, when on Earth. But as you say, it's unspecified here - and IF the angels were represented on Earth as female this time, then Lot offering his 2 daughters under a sexual interpretation starts to make more sense.
"anshei ha'ir, anshei S'dom" means "the people of the city [not only men]
Very interesting, if true.
You'd think that with all the fire and brimstone raining down...
This gets us to the scientific part. Sodom's destruction was more a 3900C flash event. (Could have rained stones in outlying areas.)
First - Bible's internal geographic indicators strongly put Sodom at North East end of Dead Sea.
https://www.amazon.com/Discovering-City-Sodom-Fascinating-Testaments-ebook/dp/B008J2BQTA
Known to 19th century scholars. Then 20th century scholars decided to put Sodom at south end of Dead Sea. That view still lives among 21st century scholars - but not all - pendulum begins to swing back.
And indeed there is a key ruin at NE end of Dead Sea, now called Tall El Hammam.
And it was destroyed roughly 3700 years ago by meteor airburst like Tuskunga of 1908.
Here is the paper, written by astrophysicists (NOT Steven Collins):
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-021-97778-3
The question is not whether it happened. The paper went through unusual extra rounds of peer review after people kept questioning it. And survived.
The question, rather, is whether it is correct to move Abraham & Lot into same era & location & thus identify Tall El Hammam with Bible's "burnt - a ruined heap" city.
I say yes. Arguments exist on both sides. But arguments on the "no" side tend to be regressive misunderstandings of the "yes" side by people who simply hate Bible & want it to be 100% myth.
In a generation or two, I think identification of Tall El Hammam with Bible's "burnt - a ruined heap" city will be taken as obvious.
Thus, it will be (or maybe is already) impossible to call Sodom's existence & destruction a myth.
Still the question remains of WHETHER GOD destroyed Sodom and if yes, WHY. Let's get back to that.
Ezekeiel [sic; Ezekiel] 16:49 says "Now this was the sin of your sister Sodom: She and her daughters were arrogant, overfed and unconcerned; they did not help the poor and needy." Again, no mention of homosexuality.
Yes. Well, you must continue into verse 50 which mentions people doing "detestable things". But again, that could mean anything. Still no specific reference to homosexuality.
Matthew 10:14-15 is a quote from Jesus...
Correct. Christ's quote links Sodom to the idea of deep inhospitality - cruelty to the needy & stranger - not to sex.
Judges 19:13-27...
That story, to me, is a little more obviously sexual.
Homophobes often forget how NORMAL, yet still potentially-disgraceful or sometimes-disgraceful, male-homosexual acts are in ancient & Middle Eastern cultures.
Guys will toss each other off, may even fuck each other secretly. But public rape - str8 rape or gay rape - Very disgraceful to the rape victim (female or male), and, since it shows cruelty and inhospitality, somewhat disgraceful to the rapist.
In other words: If Judges story is sexual, then it's a story about cruel public rape.
We can agree that all rape is wrong - whether it's adults having sex by force, or people molested who just can't give a meaningful consent (kids, needy subordinates, the dead).