But was CNN's "debate" op meant to help Hillary? Big Mike? both? neither?

But was CNN's "debate" op meant to help Hillary? Big Mike? both? neither?

Criminal lies about his "six handicap" or "8 handicap" in golf - like it matters:
https://x.com/i/status/1806515710669074461
CNN panel talks about Dem panic (that, again, CNN staged - to get rid of Biden, we now see)
https://x.com/i/status/1806520526380347501
Same on NBC:
https://x.com/i/status/1806525763610411269
and MSNBC:
https://x.com/i/status/1806519685690847386
But - Biden was like this all along. Conservatives didn't lie about him. Libs lied
Politico weighs in - Remember, this means Biden gets replaced ie. Trump to face better opponent.

Criminal Biden all but crapped his pants.
CNN set him up with every advantage.... but let him flounder.
They staged it - to open talk of Replace Biden - which happens now.
Their goal was to show his dementia so that even jaroontards would have to come out of their 1984-"Party" -type denial.
HAHAHAHahahahahahahha 
We'll get a switch - to Big Mike or Hillary or Gavin, small outside chance of Dr. Jill.
What a fun show, tho.
Nice summary (not mine) "Assange was not imprisoned for his own crimes, but for revealing the crimes of others."
PS. Hillary, and Pompeo (Trump CIA Director) each wanted to drone Assange. On no charges.
That President Trump didn't pardon Assange, is either unfortunate (like if Trump was constrained?) or plain wrong. One of those.
As for Hillary....

@lololulu19 I've watched certain beaches for decades - relative to fixed known rock features - No change.
I'm not saying it's impossible. But libs' decades of pushing panic....... Fuck that shit.
Remember 2018 when Grifta tweeted we only have 5 years to save humanity?
or 1990-whenever, when Gore said we only had 12?
Maybe climate does change.... but panicky claims were wrong.
https://x.com/shellenberger/status/1806341713826378035
CNN Fake News:

Slightly better:

@Spintendo Congress continues to find Garland way wrong:
https://x.com/i/status/1806044838531666311
Perhaps Garland will go to prison like Navarro & Bannon. But I don't hold my breath.
Here's Glenn Greenwald, on Assange & his plea deal.
https://rumble.com/v53xcf8-enduring-media-lies-and-myths-about-julian-assange-debunked.html
https://rumble.com/v53wyum-julian-assanges-plea-deal-explained.html
tldr;
Assange worked as a normal journalist, publishing "secrets" public deserves to know
always tried to work with USA government for proper redactions
USA, think Hillary / State Department, were ones who refused to work with him
yet even so, no one ever found evidence of anyone who died from what Assange published
Assange has won more journalism awards than almost anybody
So, when libs on CNN & warmonger neocon RINOs try to say darkly "He's not a journalist & did wrong & has blood on his hands"............
..... ..... They lie.
as usual
To sum up:
USA DOJ never prosecutes Contempt of Congress, when it involves Executive Privilege issues.....
as @spintendo showed, at length.....
......UNTIL it's Bannon & Navarro (or Executive Privilege for President Trump)
even then, it's only white-collar misdemeanor......
.....EXCEPT Bannon & Navarro, they get max jail
Decode key is: USA Regime shields its friends, of any political party.......... ...and jails dissidents
2 systems of "justice"

Oh - speaking of Child Mutilators - Biden, Rachel Levine?
https://www.nytimes.com/2024/06/25/health/transgender-minors-surgeries.html
?
Either DHS "does a hangout" - limited, self-protective disclosure of problem that really is 10 times greater - or else it's a cry for help from remaining good people in DHS.
Let's hope Bowman does it again, on his way out


@Spintendo House to WITHDRAW ARGUMENTS they previously asserted.
https://thehill.com/homenews/4740358-speaker-mike-johnson-steve-bannon-appeal/
“The amicus brief will be submitted after Bannon files a petition for rehearing en banc and will be in support of neither party,” Johnson, House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-La.), and House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-Minn.) said in a joint statement. “It will withdraw certain arguments made by the House earlier in the litigation about the organization of the Select Committee to Investigate the January 6 Attack on the U.S. Capitol during the prior Congress. House Republican Leadership continues to believe Speaker Pelosi abused her authority when organizing the Select Committee.”
“We’re working on filing an amicus brief in his appellate work there in his case because the Jan. 6 committee was, we think, wrongfully constituted,” Johnson told Fox News’s Sean Hannity. “We think the work was tainted. We think that they may have very well covered up evidence and maybe even more nefarious activities.”
@Spintendo said in Appeals Court Refuses to Delay Steve Bannon's 4-Month Contempt Prison Sentence:
That's because even though the House adopted a resolution citing Lerner for criminal contempt of Congress, they did not choose to approve a resolution authorizing the committee to pursue civil enforcement of the subpoena in federal court, as had been done in the past. Thus, it was handled by US attorneys in the District of Columbia.
It's weird how you think that could make it better.
Soooooooooooooooo weird.
will say again: it's a REGIME...a UNIPARTY... a club or culture of people, who may pretend to fight, but, who misuse institutions, laws, circumstances & personnel appointments - to protect each other.
Look at its END RESULTS. Look at who fought for what to happen - or, who failed to fight ie. who sat there delighted, when certain things conveniently never happened.
If anyone deserves jail, it's Lois Lerner. But again - That would implicate Obama, old dead McCain, etc. Regime can't have that happen.
@spintendo Your precious Regime DOJ, jailed Bannon for political comments.
See below.
"Mock[ery]" and "name calling" are looooooooooooong USA-1A tradition
Even if Bannon has guilty conviction - wrong as it is - Still no need to jail him.
Fragile USA Regime said quiet part out loud 
But, wave your hands now & explain it away

![1717777350555-6d5f62a2-f169-45df-bcec-7f698dbbccfd-image[1].png](/assets/uploads/files/1719415719794-1717777350555-6d5f62a2-f169-45df-bcec-7f698dbbccfd-image-1.png)
@raphjd Oh good! At least 55-45.
"This is what Democracy looks like"
I don't know if George Latimer any better - but.....
Jamal Bowman did insurrection - stopped official proceedings - then was liar & hypocrite, about it.
wiki: "Helen Joyce (born 1968) is an Irish journalist and gender critical activist. She studied as a mathematician and worked in academia before becoming a journalist. Joyce began working for The Economist as education correspondent for its Britain section in 2005 and has since held several senior positions, including finance editor and international editor.[3] She published her book Trans: When Ideology Meets Reality in 2021."
now what she said
https://x.com/i/status/1805628069031408007
"People who have transitioned their own children are going to be like the Japanese soldiers on Pacific islands who didn't know the war was over - They've got to fight forever..."
"[they've] done the worst thing they could do, harm their children irrevocably.... [they] will have to believe they did the right thing for the rest of their lives, for their own sanity...."
"Each one of those people destroys entire organizations & entire friendship groups... the entire organization gets parazlyed by one person [as] you can't talk truth in front of that person..."
"There are specific individuals who are really actively against Women's rights & it's not known why they are. I happen to know through the back channels that it's because they've transed their child...."
"People like me are a standing reproach to them. I don't want to be, but.... simply by saying, we will never accept natal males in women's spaces, well, it's their son that we're talking about. And they've told their son that he get can get himself sterilized, destroy his own sexual function, and women will accept him as a woman. And if we don't, there's no way back for them & their child...."
"I'm the one who has to be bullied, to force me to [accept natal males in Women's spaces, & lies of gender-change]... and it's a fight to the death, as far as they're concerned."
@Spintendo ....whereupon Obama DOJ - that's an expression, don't overreact - Dropped whole thing.
As you described.
I'm just old enough to remember time when USA politicians pretended, at least, to be outraged by underling's misdeeds.
They'd go after their own underlings, in name of fairness honesty & good government.
But Obama couldn't afford to......... again,, all those Lois Lerner visits to WH.