I wonder if mods should take a look at this thread, it kinda makes some of us keel a bit uncomfortable to say at least. The title also contains "daddy" which is usually referred to the type of a guy, not a biological parent.
Why the hell can't you just act like a grown man and if you are uncomfortable, remove yourself! Good grief! Grow the hell up and find your damn balls and be a MAN!
Have done both and enjoy both. The thing about orgies is sometimes I just enjoy standing back and watching and other times I like being watched….
:sucky:
I wonder if mods should take a look at this thread, it kinda makes some of us keel a bit uncomfortable to say at least. The title also contains "daddy" which is usually referred to the type of a guy, not a biological parent.
Well, don't read it! Take responsibility for YOUR actions and feelings and let others live the way THEY want! :crazy2:
6.75 inches in length and just over 6 inches in girth.
Unless he actually does go out on 5th avenue and shoot someone, he won't be impeached by this Congress. If the Democrats win back the House in 2018, that is a different story. Even under those circumstances, he would never be convicted in the Senate.67 Senators would have to vote to convict, a very high bar indeed.
I believe the Republicans will abandon him if his unpopularity brings them down far enough. There will come a point where they no longer defend him out of fear that they will lose everything.
He is more popular and has better approval ratings than the GOP in the House or Senate. What I predict is that we will see a lot of new faces elected in 2018, they just will be fresh Republican faces to unseat the old ones.
I love Diamond and Silk.
That got down voted.
I guess the racism and woman hating of the left is coming out now.
If they aren't in lockstep with the leftist agenda, women and minorities are treated worse than terrorists by the idealogues.
FTR: The killer was a far-left "progressive"! He was a Bernie-bro turned Jill Stein voter. Quit trying to blame this on the GOP or conservatives.
Anything to distract from the fact that he was a Nazi that feels the same way about race as the right does, huh?
He wanted a Sanders/ Stein ticket, so he's clearly been unhinged for a while if he thought that ever happened.
Above being a "bernie bro" He's a fucking Nazi (I'd just say white supremacist, but he does the salute and all) / murderous terrorist.
How is the statement of fact, to clarify the misinformation and mis-allusions that had been hurled an attempt to distract? It was an act of clarification.
The truth is this man was crazy, but I thought by stating that he supported Sanders then Stein made that clear. When he caused a disruption at a prior pro-Trump rally the organizers reported him to police who promptly did nothing.
FTR: The killer was a far-left "progressive"! He was a Bernie-bro turned Jill Stein voter. Quit trying to blame this on the GOP or conservatives.
He is also a Democrat that was a Bernie or Buster.
- Comey was not investigating anything. The FBI is. Comey wasn't an agent, and wasn't "doing" anything other than overseeing an arm of the DOJ.
…Which means he's overseeing the investigation.
2)It LITERALLY IS relative, since WaPo getting their hands on that information is actually a criminal offense by the person that gave them the information and does more harm to our Nat. Security THAN ANYTHING Trump has even been accused of doing.
The Washington Post was actually quite circumspect in order to prevent divulging any classified material. Please explain to the group how a newspaper reporting that Trump out and out gave the Russian classified intelligence is more harmful to our national security than Trump giving the Russians classified intelligence? But good job at attempting to deflect from the real issue.
3)More lies. Whether or not Gen. Flynn did anything improper is highly suspect. The FBI cleared him regarding the call in December on January 24th because what he did WAS proper. How long exactly did Manafort actually work for Trump? Where did his children confirm any such ties? Surely you aren't trying to use an article by an unnamed source that claims Eric told him something golfing several years ago, and that which Eric flatly denied?
The FBI is still investigating Flynn, so they obviously haven't "cleared" him. It doesn't matter how long Manafort worked for Trump. And it wasn't an unnamed source, it was a journalist there specifically to write a story on Trump's golf courses, with the statements being corroborated by two others.
Not to mention, of course, this quote from Donald Trump Jr. “… In terms of high-end product influx into the U.S., Russians make up a pretty disproportionate cross-section of a lot of our assets, say in Dubai, and certainly with our project in SoHo and anywhere in New York. We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia,”
And, of course, here's the Wall Street Journal:
which means the investigation is ongoing, and as was testified to under oath not only is it ongoing, but there had been no attempts to obstruct it.
Because 1 is ILLEGAL and the other isn't. Trump, by definition, cannot illegally disclose classified information. He has been elected to be the Executive, the anonymous source hasn't. Trump gets to make the decision what to share and with whom, the anonymous source doesn't.
Eric Trump again denies this conversation and the fact that legal filings to Congress do not show income or debt ties to Russia (with few exceptions) debunk the claim. As for the Don Jr. quote from 9 years ago, you do realize he was discussing Russia's economy and how at that time the ruble was strong over the dollar, so the Russian investors were using that to invest in properties outside of Russia. Not RUSSIA, but Russian investors, 9 years ago. As for your link, again, it proves NOTHING! Goodness gracious!
Critical thinking is your friend! Use it.
You do realize the "anonymous" sourcing that has fueled this one story being reported by every other paper "claims" information was said that has already been debunked by people in the actual room. Not all of these sources actually vet the information anymore and just rely on the original author to have done that. Every story has been debunked by actual named sources. Just because you wish something to be doesn't make it so.
Deal in facts and not hyperventilating soundbites! You will not only be better informed, but less emotional.
:ot:
None of those people are currently in office because President Obama's administration ended on January 20, 2017; therefore, they have absolutely zero to do with this conversation. I didn't ask whether President Obama or anyone who worked in his administration did anything wrong; I clearly asked "Should #45 be impeached and removed from office?" If you want to discuss the previous administration then I suggest you create a thread about your personal grievances with people who are no longer in power and have no effect on our lives today. Do you have an answer for the question posed by this thread or are you here to disrupt the conversation without adding anything? The latter is against the rules by the way so be careful :cool2:
Okay, I call bullshit. You can't claim something as a damning offense, and then when someone rebuffs your attempt by putting it in context then cry foul. Your attempt is laughable. There has been ZERO PROOF of anything 1) impeachable or 2) improper! Just because you wish it to be true doesn't make it true!
Public Policy Polling is a U.S. Democratic polling firm based in Raleigh, North Carolina. PPP was founded in 2001 by businessman Dean Debnam, the firm's current president and chief executive officer.
Seems legit…
I don't suppose that Hillary instructing some private company with no security clearance to access and delete at least 30,000 e-mails, which were property of the U.S. government, AFTER being ordered by Congress to turn them over, is obstruction of justice? nooo….
Yeah. It isn't believable that anyone cares about any of this when Trump compromised the identity of American operatives in the Middle East when he divulged information of the highest classification level to the Russians in an effort to brag to them. Try again.
Where do you get your information, and how does it get through the tinfoil?
Both Counselor Kellyanne Conway and Press Secretary Sean Spicer have continuously and intentionally misled the American people on various important issues
"If you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor. PERIOD. If you like your plan, you can keep your plan. PERIOD."– BHO
"But our current best assessment, based on the information that we have at present, is that, in fact, what this began as, it was spontaneous -- not a premeditated -- response to what had transpired in Cairo. In Cairo, as you know, a few hours earlier, there was a violent protest that was undertaken in reaction to this very offensive video that was disseminated."-- Susan Rice
"Lack of transparency is a huge political advantage, and basically, call it the stupidity of the American voter or whatever, but basically that was really, really critical for the thing to pass."-- Jonathan Gruber, architect of Obamacare.
These are just 3 that readily popped into my head. These former 2 were instances where the President and his Ambassador DELIBERATELY LIED to the American people for their own political expediency. There was an ABSOLUTE INTENT to deceive for gain. The latter was just a freudian slip that just confirms the first lie!
Anything I have seen by Spicer or Conway has been a mistake that was blown out of proportion, more has been made of them than Obama visiting all 57 states.
James Comey exonerated Trump 3 times, stating there was no collusion.
Now that would be quite an accomplishment considering his investigation is incomplete and he was fired in the middle of it.
The Washington Post reported that Trump in his recent visit with Russian Ambassador revealed highly classified info.
-How would they know that? And why would Trump do that after repeatedly stating they were tapping him?It literally is irrelevant how they knew considering Trump went on Twitter and confirmed everything.
Get over your hate for Trump. He's not a Republican. He's just using their platform. And the claim that he is colluding with Russia has after 9 months been proven to show no evidence whatsoever, so it's pretty much just dumb.
Well other than Michael Flynn, Paul Manafort, that fact that his children confirmed his business ties (including loans) to Russia, and the fact that this past week Trump literally gave Russia highly classified intel that compromised American agents.
2)It LITERALLY IS relative, since WaPo getting their hands on that information is actually a criminal offense by the person that gave them the information and does more harm to our Nat. Security THAN ANYTHING Trump has even been accused of doing.
3)More lies. Whether or not Gen. Flynn did anything improper is highly suspect. The FBI cleared him regarding the call in December on January 24th because what he did WAS proper. How long exactly did Manafort actually work for Trump? Where did his children confirm any such ties? Surely you aren't trying to use an article by an unnamed source that claims Eric told him something golfing several years ago, and that which Eric flatly denied?
13 years. Today happens to be his 55th birthday. I have been with him since I was 27.