Option to turn off Trans content?
-
So there are options to turn off straight, bi, and scat content, but no option to turn off trans content. Can the site owners implement such an option? Trans is not gay (nor straight) and I don't want to see that content.
Thanks.
-
"Trans is not gay (nor straight)"
It's not related to sexual orientation whatsoever but rather it's a solely identitary category. In order to fulfill your demand they would also need options to turn off all those categories: Asian, Bears, Black, Chubbies, Daddies/Sons, Interracial, Latino, Mature, Middle Eastern and Twinks.
-
@ianfontinell-0 The categories you mention are sub-categories of men, not identity. Those who want to see men want to see men who are actual men (so biological men, I can't believe I have to use that expression) and who look like men. Having a dick and looking like a woman, while they may be biologically male, is not what I'm interested in.
Trans, as you say, is purely identity, so there is no relationship to the sub-categories you've mentioned. Scat is also not related to sexual orientation but there is a filter for that.
-
@MaleMan said in Option to turn off Trans content?:
Having a dick and looking like a woman, while they may be biologically male, is not what I'm interested in.
So don't download it. I'm not interested in "femme twinks" so I don't download them. Hopefully you're not so fragile that browsing the torrents and seeing a chick with a dick or a FTM bro with more testosterone than you (Buck Angel?) ruins your day.
There are far more critical requests (like category search improvements) that need attention first, but site changes are (understandably) slow.
-
@justatest90-0 What kind of argument is that? If you're going to use that argument, why have filters to remove straight/bi/scat content? We could also just tell you, "Don't download it then."
Filters are used to save us time. Imagine searching for shoes and having results for completely unrelated things like phones, bags, food, etc. It'd be a waste of your time, right?
I'm not interesed in trans content. It's not that I'm afraid of seeing trans images or that I'm so fragile. I value my time and if I know that content is not what I want, I have no need for it to appear in the results. Is that so hard to understand? Is the fragile one the one that wants to save time, or the one that gets seemingly offended that others don't want such content?
-
@MaleMan said in Option to turn off Trans content?:
What kind of argument is that? If you're going to use that argument, why have filters to remove straight/bi/scat content? We could also just tell you, "Don't download it then."
What kind of argument is that? If you're going to use that argument, why not have filters to remove femme twink content? Why not have filters to remove older content? Why not have filters to remove content filmed on Tuesdays? Why not have... (Notice this is effectively ianfontinell's argument)
The question isn't "can such-and-such a filter be useful?" because of course it can be, that's why we have search. The question is, what filters and what design choices to support them, and what tools do you already have to meet your needs vs. developing tools with no need but to shelter you.
Because isn't there functionally a trans filter? This search should have you taken care of. You can also probably fork https://sleazyfork.org/en/scripts/569455-gaytor-rent-ai-blacklist?locale_override=1 to do what you need as a userscript (discussed here). Stop expecting everything to be done for you.
But maybe I'm hoping for too much when someone can't use forum search or put a topic in the right place.
-
@justatest90-0 So I think we can all see who the fragile one is. Why so much aggressivity? It's clear it offends you that some want to hide trans content. You seem to have no problems with there being filters for straight/bi/scat content but trans if off limits.
I don't want to see trans content when browsing the latest torrents, so before doing a search. The only way to hide them would be for there to be a trans filter the same way there are filters for straight/bi/scat content. Why does this offend you so much?
Please don't bother replying. My request is not destined for you but the site owners and it's clear this request has triggered you.
-
I personally would support REMOVING the special rules for negative filtering for str8, bi, & scat content....
If there is content on the site you don't want to see, there are ALREADY filters on the browse and search pages - learn to use them.
Yes, I realize that those are "inclusion" filters, and not "exclusion" filters, so if your "offensive" str8 is also tagged "Asian" and you are searching for Asian content, you'll still get the Str8 entry... oh the humanity!)
Besides, as far as I can tell, those filters (for Str8, Bi, & Scat) don't always work anyway. I'm told they only apply to the first category. Thus, I would support the idea of making that filtering in the browsing or search pages an "exclusion" list, or creating a separate list for exclusions - but it should apply (as the positive filter does) to all of the listed categories, not just the first one.
That said, I think the Mods have plenty to do already, and changing code to "shield the sensitive eyes" of some noisy users probably isn't high on the priority list.
IMHO, if you are "offended" by the sight of a vagina, you probably don't belong to the "adult" category to begin with. (To be clear: If I never see another vagina in my life, I will not miss it. But I should encounter one (sexually), I won't run screaming from the room!)
Finally, the same arguments are being made (in some cases by the same people) about AI generated porn. IMHO, it won't be too long before that AI porn is indistinguishable (in expert creators' hands) from the real thing...
-
@MaleMan said in Option to turn off Trans content?:
@justatest90-0 So I think we can all see who the fragile one is. Why so much aggressivity?
You're bonkers mate. There is a filter, I gave you the link to the filter, and a link on how to build a better filter.
I'm triggered by 0 reading, 0 research, 0 attempt to solve the problem yourself, 0 effort to put the post in the right area. Just selfish 'serve me' boomer nonsense. Literally don't care what you want to filter.
-
@bi4smooth said in Option to turn off Trans content?:
I'm told they only apply to the first category.
Yeah this is the site request that's much more needed, and long in the queue, and can't be done on your own. If you want "X" content, it has to be the primary category or it doesn't show up, sadly.
Glad someone else posted, reset the gaslighting lol, thought I was going bonkers.
-
@justatest90-0 A sarcastic person needing some attention who don't want others opinion and live by his/her own fault ... drama ...
-
@MaleMan said:
@ianfontinell-0 The categories you mention are sub-categories of men, not identity. Those who want to see men want to see men who are actual men (so biological men, I can't believe I have to use that expression) and who look like men. Having a dick and looking like a woman, while they may be biologically male, is not what I'm interested in.
Those are not sub-categories of anything, those are identitary groups, and no i'm not talking about politics or even race, i'm talking strictly about culture.
You could argue that content featuring trans women should fall into the straight/bi category and therefore filtered out alongside the rest of straight/bi content.
But instead you chose to put it as "mods please i don't want to see a woman with a cock bigger than mine" and hence the reaction you're getting.
I'm not gonna be accusing you of anything, I won't say your transphobic or anything of that sort... But let's say you are, hypothetically... Why would you think you're worth of any sympathy? Why would anyone go out of their way to solve your problem?
You know what I mean? I have half a dozen userscripts I made for this site to make me waste less time seeing what I'm not interested in, so I understand your struggle to a decent extent.
Point being: your problem = fix it yourself.
