Detransitioner speaks

frostycab

@Spintendo

You're still a whiny sniveling bitch and a racist.

I'm sorry, but this goes way beyond the point of the "polite disagreement" you yourself wrote into the rules for this sub-forum. I realise that you've posted this as a personal comment and not as a mod, but I think this really crosses the line.

"If you want to call your "enemy" a cunt or the like, take it elsewhere."

raphjd

@frostycab

I'm sure you have seen my post about repeatedly derailing topics, as well.

He is clearly a racist from his repeated posts about the people of Macedonia and he is a sniveling whiny bitch in that he keeps posting about the links I provide when he can google the topic if he hates the source and/or the people of Macedonia so much.

He refuses to discuss any topic.

His posts are only to attack the source, in a racist rant.

blablarg18

@Spintendo You defended Big Pharma, Big Hospital, Big Trans with the "cloud of words" that left-wing philosophers say is how Power deceives The People.

Congratulations.

Also congrats for misunderstanding my point in another thread, about Shoot The Messenger.

Suppose I (messenger) say "It's raining" (content).

The fact that I (messenger) said it, has -no bearing- on whether it (content) is true.

Either it's raining or it isn't. Horrible as you may find me, -I am irrelevant- as to whether it's raining in fact.

Of course, if topic is cookie recipes, my content "It's raining" is itself irrelevant even if it is factual.

So question is NEVER "Where did content come from", but always 2,

is content factual
is content on-topic

Now suppose I (messenger) say "Trans lobby typically suppresses countervailing evidence by terrorizing any scientists who might generate or spread it, leading to a cascade of bad pro-Trans 'studies' in public discussion." (content).

Again: The 2 questions are

is content factual
is content on topic

When we're discussing cookie recipes and you say "The one from NY Post was funded by Macedonians!!", you're saying something irrelevant - even if factual.

When we're discussing Trans and I mention how systemically one-sided Trans "science" is, I'm saying something very on topic. ONLY REMAINING question is, whether my statement was factual.

See the difference?

Shooting The Messenger is: attacking a messenger / source of content -for reasons so off topic, they obscure- what the topic & content even are.

And that's its purpose, no? People who do it are hand-waving, saying "Don't look there, look here!"

Like when Hillary was caught keeping 30,000 classified documents in her bathroom server, cheating Bernie Sanders out of his delegate wins & destroying evidence - so yall libs said "Russssshiiaaa!"

Like that.

Yall da queens. Can't touch ur crowns.

Back on topic:

blablarg18

@raphjd more -

https://twitter.com/DrLoupis/status/1654767087259197440

"This is a girl’s forearm. Her muscles have been farmed to create a fake phallus that doesn’t function. They will try to make her a fake urethra. She’ll probably be incontinent, she will certainly never function like a man. And her muscles won’t grow back."

raphjd

Spintendo

@blablarg18 said in Detransitioner speaks:

The 2 questions are

is content factual

is content on topic

A basic start in determining #1 is by asking where does the information come from. If it comes from a clickfarm run by the good people of Macedonia in order to make money, and that website is the only one provided in the discussion where that claim is made, and that website does not, itself, list any proof of where it got its information from, then we're on a pretty good path to determining that it's something to be extremely suspect of.

If someone made the claim that "it's raining in Tucson", and you knew that the person making that claim didn't live in Tucson, one of the first questions you would ask to determine the factuality of it would be "how do you know it's raining in Tucson". Epistemological questions such as this are always relevant.

raphjd

@Spintendo

You are still a sniveling why racist bitch.

You know that they get all of their "news" from other sites, but you still hate them because they aren't leftist assclowns like you.

Joy "I was hacked" Reid made racist and homophobic social media posts, then lied about it claiming someone went back in time and t hacked her. She even got the FBI involved. Eventually, she admitted she was a pathological liar and you losers still believe every word she says.

They list is never ending on the scumbags from liberal media that you worship, but only are nothing more than a racist against Macedonians.

raphjd

@Spintendo

You are a stupid, useless twat, liar.

Resist the Mainstream does in fact list their sources in every article. I have to question if you are simply a pathological liar or you head is so far up your vagina that you are totally clueless or both.

They quote from and link to the original source.

clarknova420

This post is deleted!

raphjd

Clearly, someone likes to call names but doesn't have the courage to post their crap.

jaroonn

@raphjd Others are preternaturally bold in posting endless crap.

Spintendo

@raphjd said in Detransitioner speaks:

They quote from and link to the original source.

Then the question remains, why don't you post that original source when you place the information here in the forum? It seems that would save you all the trouble of having egg on your face for posting such ridiculous clickfarm links.

Spintendo

Here's my original source for resist the mainstream.org's clickfarm claims. It comes from Stanford and the University of Washington

https://www.eipartnership.net/2020/north-macedonian-content-farms

raphjd

@Spintendo

Why are you so racist against Macedonians?

You can click on their source link.

In order to be on this site, you have to be an adult. An adult would be able to click the source link in the article I post.