• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents

    Because the science says so

    Politics & Debate
    7
    34
    81
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • bi4smooth
      bi4smooth @raphjd last edited by

      @raphjd said in Because the science says so:

      @geobear40

      I think he's saying to punish the business for following the corrupt law.

      Laws are laws - you don't "fight" a law by ignoring it, you fight a law by protesting it, and working to elect representatives to CHANGE the law...

      So - if I'm reading you right, you're not just an authoritarian (when Trumpty Dumpty is in power), but you're an anarchist when he's not!

      Yer a reel prowd Merikan!

      raphjd 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • bi4smooth
        bi4smooth last edited by

        For what it's worth, I don't agree with the law either... conflating alcohol sales/availability with vaccination status makes absolutely no sense to me.

        That said, you claim that "science says so" is just plain dumb... idiotic dumb...

        Science didn't tell those Aussies to pass that dumb law... Science just said "get people vaccinated. It saves lives"

        Idiot lawmakers decided one way to convince people to get the shot is to make their access to alcohol dependent on it... dumb logic, but that wasn't science's position... science didn't say HOW to get people vaccinated, only that it was needed!

        raphjd 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • raphjd
          raphjd Forum Administrator @bi4smooth last edited by

          @bi4smooth

          Your beloved Great Uncle, by his own words and deeds, proved that he is in fact the dictator.

          Let me guess, you believe that gay people in Texas (and elsewhere) should have been totally celibate until the Supreme Court ruling decriminalizing gay sex.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • raphjd
            raphjd Forum Administrator @bi4smooth last edited by

            @bi4smooth

            It's the "follow the science" twats that pass these crackhead laws.

            It's the same people that used "science" in 1930s Germany.

            bi4smooth 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • bi4smooth
              bi4smooth @raphjd last edited by

              @raphjd said in Because the science says so:

              @bi4smooth

              It's the "follow the science" twats that pass these crackhead laws.

              It's the same people that used "science" in 1930s Germany.

              Your knowledge and understanding of history is astounding! ... In a negative, "you don't really understand SHIT" way... Let me guess, the last time you actually studied 1930's Germany was in your teens and you barely scraped by with a D in the class...

              raphjd 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • raphjd
                raphjd Forum Administrator @bi4smooth last edited by

                @bi4smooth

                Your heroes in 1930's Germany used science to justify a lot of what they were doing.

                .

                bi4smooth 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • bi4smooth
                  bi4smooth @raphjd last edited by

                  @raphjd said in Because the science says so:

                  @bi4smooth

                  Your heroes in 1930's Germany used science to justify a lot of what they were doing.

                  .

                  You stupid twit, the German doctors who did experiments on prisoners didn't claim that Science told them this was the right thing to do, they used the human prisoners to conduct scientific experiments... experiments that were known to be fatal to the subjects and were little more than "morbid curiosity" and complete disregard for the value of human life.

                  Scientists in the US did not tell the President to experiment on people, or to indiscriminately kill people "for the curiosity about it"... they operated on a basis of "save as many as we can" - showing GREAT regard for the value of EACH human life...

                  Again, your educational background (or lack thereof) is ASTOUNDING!

                  raphjd G 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • raphjd
                    raphjd Forum Administrator @bi4smooth last edited by

                    @bi4smooth

                    OK, dearie.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • G
                      geobear40 @lololulu19 last edited by

                      @lololulu19

                      Do you realize how misogynistic your post was.

                      The word retard is like calling you a fag.

                      L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • G
                        geobear40 @bi4smooth last edited by

                        @bi4smooth said in Because the science says so:

                        You stupid twit, the German doctors who did experiments on prisoners didn't claim that Science told them this was the right thing to do, they used the human prisoners to conduct scientific experiments... experiments that were known to be fatal to the subjects and were little more than "morbid curiosity" and complete disregard for the value of human life.
                        Scientists in the US did not tell the President to experiment on people, or to indiscriminately kill people "for the curiosity about it"... they operated on a basis of "save as many as we can" - showing GREAT regard for the value of EACH human life...
                        Again, your educational background (or lack thereof) is ASTOUNDING!

                        You will twist anything to validate your comments.

                        bi4smooth 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • L
                          lololulu19 @geobear40 last edited by

                          @geobear40 don't start on me Karen... and look up the word misogynistic.. you don't have a clue what it means.

                          By the way, a person who is retarded has a defective brain. A person who is nearsighted has defective eyes. A person who is deaf has defective ears. By calling that woman "retarded", my intent was to offend her. If she really was retarded, she would have an excuse for her behavior. I don't go up to people who are actually retarded, and call them retarded. I go up to people who are acting like assholes (not to offend any assholes) and point out that they are behaving as if they are retarded. Now, simmer down, and go watch a guy get fucked up the ass by two cocks.. such as Mark Zuckerberg. zuckerbergbottom.JPG

                          G 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • bi4smooth
                            bi4smooth @geobear40 last edited by

                            @geobear40 said in Because the science says so:

                            @bi4smooth said in Because the science says so:

                            You stupid twit, the German doctors who did experiments on prisoners didn't claim that Science told them this was the right thing to do, they used the human prisoners to conduct scientific experiments... experiments that were known to be fatal to the subjects and were little more than "morbid curiosity" and complete disregard for the value of human life.
                            Scientists in the US did not tell the President to experiment on people, or to indiscriminately kill people "for the curiosity about it"... they operated on a basis of "save as many as we can" - showing GREAT regard for the value of EACH human life...
                            Again, your educational background (or lack thereof) is ASTOUNDING!

                            You will twist anything to validate your comments.

                            Yup - my analysis was as twisted as a ruler - and your understanding of history is on par with, I'd say, my understanding of sub-particle physics!

                            Which is to say: you can spell it (well, sometimes!) 🙂

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • G
                              geobear40 @lololulu19 last edited by

                              @lololulu19
                              What is the meaning of being misogynist?
                              : feeling, showing, or characterized by hatred of or prejudice against women : of, relating to, or being a misogynist misogynistic attitude/behaviors a song with misogynistic lyrics As you might imagine, the group's ethos is extremely misogynistic and accepting of violent threats against women.—

                              L 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • L
                                lololulu19 @geobear40 last edited by

                                @geobear40 That's correct.. and my comments to her had nothing to do with the fact that she is a female. So, why did you interject that word?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                                • 1
                                • 2
                                • 2 / 2
                                • First post
                                  Last post