Dan Bongino permanently banned by YouTube for challenging COVID-19 narrative
-
His crime was to include a video clip of St Fauci of Gain of Function saying that masks don't work.
Fauci said it, but Bongino gets punished for it.
-
@raphjd
And even Fauci claimed it was a lie to protect scares supply. -
@geobear40 said in Dan Bongino permanently banned by YouTube for challenging COVID-19 narrative:
@raphjd
And even Fauci claimed it was a lie to protect scares supply.You poor guys....
I get it... your Source For Science (the all-knowing, Lord Dumpster... I mean, Darth Dumpster... no, I mean His Lowness the Dumpster... damn, I'll get it... Ford Trumpster?
Anyway...that fascist guy... He Who Must Be Named Often has been wishy-washy on masks all along...
- Feb 29, 2020: Do not buy a mask
- Mar 30, 2020: We must wear a mask, but it will not be for a long period of time
- Apr 2, 2020: wearing a mask should be a personal choice, but people should wear them
- May 21, 2020: I wore a mask earlier, but I'm not wearing one now because I don't want the press to see me wearing a mask
- July 21, 2020: "America's youth will act responsibly, and we're asking everybody that when you are not able to socially distance, wear a mask, get a mask. Whether you like the mask or not, they have an impact. They'll have an effect. And we need everything we can get."
- July 31, 2020: Wear a mask when you cannot avoid crowded places or socially distance.
- Aug 3, 2020: [from Campaign email flyer] "We are all in this together, and while I know there has been some confusion surrounding the usage of face masks, I think it's something we should all try to do when we are not able to be socially distanced from others," the email reads. "I don't love wearing them either."
- Aug 9, 2020: Wearing a mask is patriotic
- Sep 10, 2020: (behind in polls, asked about golfers who joined him who did not wear masks) "They don't have to. It's a political activity. They have exceptions,"
- Oct 2, 2020: (slipping more in the polls, asked about masks and Joe Biden) "I don't wear masks like him. Every time you see him, he's got a mask. He could be speaking 200 feet away from it, and he shows up with the biggest mask I've seen,"
- Oct 11, 2020: The Trumps test positive for COVID-19
In the meantime, REAL scientists started telling us to wear masks in April, 2020 (prior to then, we/they really didn't understand how much the virus was spread by aerosol and not by contact (Remember wiping down your groceries? Remember using hand sanitizer every 15-minutes because you touched something? Remember the public service ads telling you to wash your hands 5x more often than usual?)
And they haven't stopped since then.
No whiplash for those of us who follow real science.
You want to know what's even more curious?
Once he lost the election, other than being against mask MANDATES, Dumpy has been all-but-silent on the subject. ... and truthfully, that's in part because no one cares! LOL
-
-
True, but he did say it. That makes St Fauci a criminal in the eyes of the but mah science crowd, who conveniently say that a woman's penis is biologically female.
Bongino got banned for posting a video of Fauci lying about masks.
-
@raphjd Once President #47 is inaugurated.. again.. he will cut the balls off of Youtube, Twitter, and Facebook.
-
I disagree.
Moscow Mitch is a useless Swampie. He won't lift a finger to do anything worthwhile.
-
@raphjd True, but Bitch McConnell is 79... and Lindsay Graham already told Bitch that if he doesn't shape up.. he's done as being the Senate leader.
-
@lololulu19 said in Dan Bongino permanently banned by YouTube for challenging COVID-19 narrative:
@raphjd True, but Bitch McConnell is 79... and Lindsay Graham already told Bitch that if he doesn't shape up.. he's done as being the Senate leader.
Ohhhhhh....
I'm certain that Mitch McConnell is crapping his pants over that one! He's only been the top Republican Leader in the Senate a few months now, and Lindsay Graham is a REAL POWER BROKER there! (For the record, as it's now Feb 2022, Mitch McConnell has held the top Republican post - that is, Marjority Leader or Minority Leader) for only about 181 months... )
Give him a break, he's still learning!
Of course, McConnell is scared SHITLESS of Trumpy Dumpty, too! That old queen might even try to get him primaried!! (McConnell is up for re-election in 2026, and his last one was a real "squeaker" - he actually lost 3 of 120 counties!)
You tweakers don't have a clue about actual Party Politics...
-
-
@raphjd said in Dan Bongino permanently banned by YouTube for challenging COVID-19 narrative:
You clearly love Mitch, so that proves he's shit.
Thanks for clearing it up for us.
Yeah, we should've replace McConnell a long time ago - worked with the Dems when Obama was in office, let Merrick Garland get his vote in 2016, and held off on Judge Amy - let the NEW President choose!
That would have been awesome! 2 extra Liberal Justices!
Yoo Hoo!
You keep going, dudette... keep showing us how well you understand actual (non-Trumpian) politics!
Can't wait!
-
-
@bi4smooth said in Dan Bongino permanently banned by YouTube for challenging COVID-19 narrative:
No whiplash for those of us who follow real science.
You want to know what's even more curious?
Once he lost the election, other than being against mask MANDATES, Dumpy has been all-but-silent on the subject. ... and truthfully, that's in part because no one cares! LOLIsn't it nice when you can pick and choose moments in time to explain your point.
When you start with your conclusion and work backward to show that your point is Valid. It's called Spinning the truth.I could pick out facts that Biden and his family have been selling influence since he first took office in the 70's or that Trump was right about everything he said about protecting the public and treatments of Sars-Cov-2.
You are not impressing anyone but yourself
-
@bi4smooth said in Dan Bongino permanently banned by YouTube for challenging COVID-19 narrative:
Yeah, we should've replace McConnell a long time ago - worked with the Dems when Obama was in office, let Merrick Garland get his vote in 2016, and held off on Judge Amy - let the NEW President choose!
That would have been awesome! 2 extra Liberal Justices!
Yoo Hoo!
You keep going, dudette... keep showing us how well you understand actual (non-Trumpian) politics!The party in power makes the rules. It just so happened that Republicans controlled the Senate at those moments in time. It had nothing to do with Trump.
-
@geobear40 said in Dan Bongino permanently banned by YouTube for challenging COVID-19 narrative:
@bi4smooth said in Dan Bongino permanently banned by YouTube for challenging COVID-19 narrative:
Yeah, we should've replace McConnell a long time ago - worked with the Dems when Obama was in office, let Merrick Garland get his vote in 2016, and held off on Judge Amy - let the NEW President choose!
That would have been awesome! 2 extra Liberal Justices!
Yoo Hoo!
You keep going, dudette... keep showing us how well you understand actual (non-Trumpian) politics!The party in power makes the rules. It just so happened that Republicans controlled the Senate at those moments in time. It had nothing to do with Trump.
Once again, @geobear40 - your inability to read and comprehend what you read is ... well, you're disappointing your entire local school district...
@raphjd and I aren't talking about Trumpster Dumpster, we're talking about Mitch McConnell... go back and read again.. slower this time.
And no, THANKFULLY, the party in power doesn't just get to re-write the rules! McConnell played by the existing rules - to the f-ing letter!! which is why Dems were so helpless against him...
-
Actually, they do. Ask MTG, Jim Jordan, and many others.
Dems rewrote the rules to allow your supreme goddess and gin supplier to choose who Repubs can assign to which committees.
-
@raphjd said in Dan Bongino permanently banned by YouTube for challenging COVID-19 narrative:
Actually, they do. Ask MTG, Jim Jordan, and many others.
Dems rewrote the rules to allow your supreme goddess and gin supplier to choose who Repubs can assign to which committees.
No, you incompetent twit, they didn't re-write the rules... what they did was violate the "norms" of the House Rules.
The House Rules have always said the Speaker has to approve of all House Committee appointments... what has always been the NORM is that the Speaker delegates and accepts the appointments of the minority party by the minority leader. Pelosi violated that norm for the Jan 6 investigation committee because McCarthy tried to appoint people to the committee who had already tipped their hands that they thought the Committee was a farce.
Truth is, it's just another "shot" across the bow of the long-held American norm of a "loyal opposition"... the Parties - for over a century - generally worked together. When one was in the majority they still worked with the other side - and remained cordial and even somewhat deferential... after all, if there's one constant about American Politics, it is that the OTHER GUY will eventually be in charge again!
Sadly, the end of this "loyal opposition" phase of our Political History started in 1995, when Newt Gingrich took over as Speaker and refused to work with or support any Democrat supported legislation - even amendments. And thus began the slow decline of civility between the sides in our Federal Government... It truly DOES make it SUCK ASS when you're in the minority...
Good news: The Dems will be in the minority soon
Bad news: The Dems will be in the majority again too...I don't know how it ends... but I don't think it ends well.
