Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it
-
You have called Tucker a liar. You once said that the only thing he might get right is his own name. BUT, you never watch him.
Not having cable does not prevent anyone from watching certain shows. I live in the UK, with no cable and I can watch their shows.
Also, just because you don't watch these liberals you love so much, doesn't mean you don't know exactly what they are saying or not saying in many cases. Other "news" outlets constantly do the incestuous quoting each other as their sources. One example is when Yahoo News quoted NYT, while NYT quoted Yahoo News. Rachel Maddow, Joy Reid, and other liberals then quoted Yahoo News and NYT, to prove their articles are "truthful".
Tim Pool did a set of videos on the liberal "journalist" cabal that got exposed. They set up various websites to conspire on which narratives to push. Each time they would get outed, they would create a new site.
Of course, to people like you, Tim Pool can't be honest because he used to be quite liberal and became a conservative because of the way liberals are.
-
@bi4smooth Oh like you need cable to watch Rachel Mad-Cow. Hello, it's called the internet. Ever heard of Youtube?
-
@manhandler said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
@bi4smooth Oh like you need cable to watch Rachel Mad-Cow. Hello, it's called the internet. Ever heard of Youtube?
YEP, I watch YouTube a lot to get "normal" broadcast and cable shows.
-
@manhandler said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
@bi4smooth Oh like you need cable to watch Rachel Mad-Cow. Hello, it's called the internet. Ever heard of Youtube?
Yes, I know YouTube - but to watch their shows on YouTube would imply that I'm searching for that content!
I am not interested!
I no more want to watch Rachel Maddow than I want to watch Tucker Carlson.
They are not news, they are "opinion" shows... and I don't need their feeble, partisan interpretations of the news.Call me Joe Friday... "Just the facts, ma'am"...
(Reference: 1960's TV cop show called "Dragnet") -
You aren't interested, but you are interested in everything QAnon says.
You slag off Tucker and said the only thing he might be able to get right is his name, yet you never, ever watch his show. So how do you know?! Who is spoon-feeding you this info? Did you just pick a random name to call a liar? Some douchebag had to tell you this stuff. I'm guessing someone from the Squad, or maybe it's printed on Pelosi's panties.
-
@raphjd said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
You aren't interested, but you are interested in everything QAnon says.
You slag off Tucker and said the only thing he might be able to get right is his name, yet you never, ever watch his show. So how do you know?! Who is spoon-feeding you this info? Did you just pick a random name to call a liar? Some douchebag had to tell you this stuff. I'm guessing someone from the Squad, or maybe it's printed on Pelosi's panties.
This is not the Straw Man you are looking for...
Again, you attribute things to me that are demonstrably untrue. Not being interested in Tucker Carlson's show is not equivalent to being a Liberal Democrat.
-
@bi4smooth No, it's not that you aren't interested in Tucker, it's that you are making up absolute fiction when talking about him. Let's hear you give us one example of something Tucker lied about.
-
@bi4smooth said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
@raphjd said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
You aren't interested, but you are interested in everything QAnon says.
You slag off Tucker and said the only thing he might be able to get right is his name, yet you never, ever watch his show. So how do you know?! Who is spoon-feeding you this info? Did you just pick a random name to call a liar? Some douchebag had to tell you this stuff. I'm guessing someone from the Squad, or maybe it's printed on Pelosi's panties.
This is not the Straw Man you are looking for...
Again, you attribute things to me that are demonstrably untrue. Not being interested in Tucker Carlson's show is not equivalent to being a Liberal Democrat.
Clearly not what I said.
You slag off Tucker and said the only thing he might be able to get right is his name, yet you never, ever watch his show. So how do you know?! Who is spoon-feeding you this info? Did you just pick a random name to call a liar? Some douchebag had to tell you this stuff. I'm guessing someone from the Squad, or maybe it's printed on Pelosi's panties.
-
@raphjd said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
@bi4smooth said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
@raphjd said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
You aren't interested, but you are interested in everything QAnon says.
You slag off Tucker and said the only thing he might be able to get right is his name, yet you never, ever watch his show. So how do you know?! Who is spoon-feeding you this info? Did you just pick a random name to call a liar? Some douchebag had to tell you this stuff. I'm guessing someone from the Squad, or maybe it's printed on Pelosi's panties.
This is not the Straw Man you are looking for...
Again, you attribute things to me that are demonstrably untrue. Not being interested in Tucker Carlson's show is not equivalent to being a Liberal Democrat.
Clearly not what I said.
You slag off Tucker and said the only thing he might be able to get right is his name, yet you never, ever watch his show. So how do you know?! Who is spoon-feeding you this info? Did you just pick a random name to call a liar? Some douchebag had to tell you this stuff. I'm guessing someone from the Squad, or maybe it's printed on Pelosi's panties.
I don't give a damn about Tucker Carlson - you can sniff his panties all night long for all I care. But he continues to make false and baseless claims about the election results... and he's as partisan as they come.
Look, he lies - and so do the other partisan hacks out there - like Bill Mahr, Sean Hannity, Rachel Maddow, and the list goes on... I don't pay attention to such biased viewpoints, but that doesn't mean I'm deaf either!
The problem with many of these (and the process started with Rush) is that they make such WILDLY false and outlandish claims, that they themselves become the story. Any news commentator or reporter who makes themselves the story is no longer news and become "entertainment" - and are as "real" as WWE.
-
@bi4smooth Oh, yea. Please give an EXAMPLE of the lies he's told. I've asked you twice now.
-
UMM, Tucker shows the proof.
He has the other side on, so you get it straight from the horse's mouth.
Your side doesn't do that.
-
@raphjd said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
UMM, Tucker shows the proof.
He has the other side on, so you get it straight from the horse's mouth.
Your side doesn't do that.
This is not the straw-man you're looking for...
You don't know anything about my sources - you keep speculating that it's some kind of liberal media, and I keep telling you I don't watch liberal OR conservative media! At least not the extremists! Indeed, a LOT of the information I get comes from INTERNATIONAL sources - so the "local politics" are somewhat removed.
-
@bi4smooth Dude, you're dumb. You're stupid. I hate to tell you that, it pains me. The Democrat run cities have the highest violence, highest homeless population, highest debt, highest pollution, and lowest education scores. That's democrats for you. There is no excuse. You are defending the indefensible.
-
@manhandler said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
@bi4smooth Dude, you're dumb. You're stupid. I hate to tell you that, it pains me. The Democrat run cities have the highest violence, highest homeless population, highest debt, highest pollution, and lowest education scores. That's democrats for you. There is no excuse. You are defending the indefensible.
ALL of the big cities are Democrat run - it's a "new" way of dividing up the country these days... time was, NYC was run by Republicans! Time was, Boston was run by Republicans!
These days, virtually EVERY major city is Democrat-run... so while you're right that the biggest of the cities are having crime sprees after COVID, you can't compare Democrat cities to Republican cities - because there are no Republican cities left!
-
@bi4smooth Actually, we can. You're stupid. You are actually defending them for their high crime and high homeless population and high debt and high pollution and low education scores. It's dumb. You're dumb.
-
@manhandler said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
@bi4smooth Actually, we can. You're stupid. You are actually defending them for their high crime and high homeless population and high debt and high pollution and low education scores. It's dumb. You're dumb.
You are again right - this time, when I wrote that "you're right that the biggest cities are having crime sprees after COVID", I must've been wrong there too...
So you're claiming that they're NOT having crime sprees? Or that they are?
You are so fixated on insisting that every word I type is wrong, you can't see the forest for the trees...
I feel sorry for you... your life must be truly miserable to keep this shit up like this!
-
@bi4smooth I'm not sure what the fuck you're talking about. The Democrat run cities have the highest crime, the lowest education scores, the highest pollution, the highest debt, and we already went over this and you have no excuse because you're dumb.
-
@manhandler said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
@bi4smooth I'm not sure what the fuck you're talking about. The Democrat run cities have the highest crime, the lowest education scores, the highest pollution, the highest debt, and we already went over this and you have no excuse because you're dumb.
You can't stay on-topic in multiple threads independently, can you....
You bleed from one to the other like a child with a one-track mind... (likely a better analogy than originally intended)....
There are no Republican-led major cities to compare to...
-
@bi4smooth Every liberal city is over-run with CRIME. HOMELESSNESS. DEBT. LOW EDUCATION SCORES. HIGH POLLUTION. You don't ANSWER that. Because you know it's true. Instead you say "Trump sucks." Your cities are burning, and you blame TRUMP. It has nothing to do with him. And you know it.
-
@manhandler said in Liberals love "whataboutisms" unless the other side does it:
@bi4smooth Every liberal city is over-run with CRIME. HOMELESSNESS. DEBT. LOW EDUCATION SCORES. HIGH POLLUTION. You don't ANSWER that. Because you know it's true. Instead you say "Trump sucks." Your cities are burning, and you blame TRUMP. It has nothing to do with him. And you know it.
Our cities are not burning... (Actually, Miami Beach is burning after that condo collapsed! - and some of the cities out West are ALSO burning - but from forest fires and extreme heat, not necessarily "burning" with violence.
You answer my question - show me a major city run by Republicans to "compare" them to... All the cattle in the western US are dying because of the Republicans running their states! (Actually, all of the cattle-producing states are run by Republicans... no Democrats to compare it to in that case either.
You can't call something the "worst" with nothing to compare it to!
