• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents

    2nd Reporter goes to Veritas, exposing Media censorship of Truth

    Politics & Debate
    3
    11
    15
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ManHandler
      ManHandler last edited by ManHandler

      https://banned.video/watch?id=60d0d41344f94c1c5c80d4b8

      Last week, a Fox Reporter in Houston, Ivory Hecker, went to Project Veritas, exposing recordings of Fox Executives telling her not to talk about Hydroxychloroquine, even though doctors were literally using it with 100% success. This week, it's a CBS News Reporter, April Moss. Because they're liars. And they're funded by the DNC.

      bi4smooth 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • bi4smooth
        bi4smooth @ManHandler last edited by

        @manhandler said in 2nd Reporter goes to Veritas, exposing Media censorship of Truth:

        https://banned.video/watch?id=60d0d41344f94c1c5c80d4b8

        Last week, a Fox Reporter in Houston, Ivory Hecker, went to Project Veritas, exposing recordings of Fox Executives telling her not to talk about Hydroxychloroquine, even though doctors were literally using it with 100% success. This week, it's a CBS News Reporter, April Moss. Because they're liars. And they're funded by the DNC.

        You are truly a moron - nothing, not even Aspirin, has a 100% success rate.

        Hydroxychloroquine was never effective at treating COVID-19. It was worth a shot at the time it was first mentioned, but further testing showed it was wholly ineffective.

        Since then, other treatments have done wonders at reducing the fatality-rate of COVID-19, but none of them contain Hydroxychloroquine - because it's ineffective, at best.

        In SCIENCE you test theories out, and when you're wrong, you notate that fact and move on. Holding onto Hydroxychloroquine as a COVID-19 treatment is DOGMA and IDEOLOGY ... not science.

        When a scientist was searching for an HIV treatment and had literally tried 20,000 substances - all with no effect to the virus, he didn't say he'd failed - he said he'd successfully discovered over 20,000 treatments that would not affect HIV - and thus, eliminated them from further, future testing! There were now 20,000 fewer things to try!

        ManHandler 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • ManHandler
          ManHandler @bi4smooth last edited by

          @bi4smooth

          Everything that you just said is wholly false and demonstrably so. Here are just a few of the studies that show you're totally wrong.

          https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2021/06/09/hydroxychloroquine-study-n2590700

          https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33042552/

          https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/03/19/100-of-patients-cautious-optimism-when-readily-used-drug-shows-promising-results-with-coronavirus-898988/

          https://www.calais.news/new-covid-19-treatment-study-shows-100-patients-virologically-cured-drug-combination

          bi4smooth 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • bi4smooth
            bi4smooth @ManHandler last edited by

            @manhandler said in 2nd Reporter goes to Veritas, exposing Media censorship of Truth:

            @bi4smooth

            Everything that you just said is wholly false and demonstrably so. Here are just a few of the studies that show you're totally wrong.

            https://townhall.com/tipsheet/katiepavlich/2021/06/09/hydroxychloroquine-study-n2590700

            https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33042552/

            https://www.bizpacreview.com/2020/03/19/100-of-patients-cautious-optimism-when-readily-used-drug-shows-promising-results-with-coronavirus-898988/

            https://www.calais.news/new-covid-19-treatment-study-shows-100-patients-virologically-cured-drug-combination

            Sure - and the media (and the CDC and other scientific outlets) claim that it is INEFFECTIVE do so solely because Trump said it was good... and they care more about making Trump bad than saving lives.

            THAT'S why their chosen careers are in SCIENCE - to make Trump look bad and kill people.

            Sad... just sad...

            raphjd ManHandler 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • raphjd
              raphjd Forum Administrator @bi4smooth last edited by raphjd

              @bi4smooth

              I'm glad you agree.

              Fauci knowingly pushed AZT, a drug of last resort, to people who were HIV+. causing their early deaths. He forgot to tell people how toxic it is and that it was only for full-blown AIDS and only as a last resort.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • ManHandler
                ManHandler @bi4smooth last edited by

                @bi4smooth In case you didn't notice! One of those links I provided was to NIH.GOV. I guess you didn't notice.

                bi4smooth 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • bi4smooth
                  bi4smooth @ManHandler last edited by

                  @manhandler said in 2nd Reporter goes to Veritas, exposing Media censorship of Truth:

                  @bi4smooth In case you didn't notice! One of those links I provided was to NIH.GOV. I guess you didn't notice.

                  In case you didn't notice, your NIH article was from 2020.
                  In case you didn't notice, the science on COVID-19 is moving quickly - as we're learning more and more daily ... and that means a LOT of what we thought early was wrong (like contact transmission? Why aren't we wiping down our groceries any longer? Because we know *better now!...

                  Science!

                  In case you didn't notice, I never said it wasn't effective as ANYTHING - just not against COVID-19 (esp once you get actually SICK from it).

                  And, in case you didn't notice, I never claimed that we didn't legitimately believe - for a short while - that it would be effective. Unfortunately, the evidence that it worked turned out to be mostly anecdotal, and didn't bear closer scrutiny or testing.... not that it was worthless: it does help in the very early stages - e.g. if you test positive for COVID-19 and have few, if any, symptoms at all yet.

                  Science was wrong (as it often is)... but it corrected itself!

                  For a humorous reflection on how Science gets is wrong sometimes, take a listen to Mike Rowe's podcast "The Way I Heard It" - Episodes 181 and 185

                  ManHandler raphjd 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • ManHandler
                    ManHandler @bi4smooth last edited by

                    @bi4smooth Ok, yes, science does change, and 2020 was last year. The results of the study don't magically become different just because a little time went by. There are other studies too. One in France that I didn't cite. There are actually many. But the media won't report on them. So yes, we can agree to disagree. I disagree.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • raphjd
                      raphjd Forum Administrator @bi4smooth last edited by

                      @bi4smooth

                      As I keep repeating, Corona Virus is one of the 3 oldest virus types on earth.

                      Humans have had to deal with it throughout our entire existence.

                      Over the last 20 years, we have had several quasi pandemics based on it.

                      We've had the common cold and flu forever and a day.

                      Other than the Gain of Function part, we should know quite a lot about corona viruses.

                      Also, we have been lied to by WHO, CDC, and many others, which is hindering science.

                      Let's not forget that your beloved, saintly Fauci previously said the gain of function engineering was worth a pandemic. He also, without approval, funded gain of function research in China, despite it being banned in the US.

                      Then, of course, there's the issue of Biden and family being owned by China. He won't lift a finger to get to the truth, if China says NO.

                      bi4smooth 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • bi4smooth
                        bi4smooth @raphjd last edited by

                        @raphjd said in 2nd Reporter goes to Veritas, exposing Media censorship of Truth:

                        @bi4smooth

                        As I keep repeating, Corona Virus is one of the 3 oldest virus types on earth.

                        Humans have had to deal with it throughout our entire existence.

                        Over the last 20 years, we have had several quasi pandemics based on it.

                        We've had the common cold and flu forever and a day.

                        Other than the Gain of Function part, we should know quite a lot about corona viruses.

                        Also, we have been lied to by WHO, CDC, and many others, which is hindering science.

                        Let's not forget that your beloved, saintly Fauci previously said the gain of function engineering was worth a pandemic. He also, without approval, funded gain of function research in China, despite it being banned in the US.

                        Then, of course, there's the issue of Biden and family being owned by China. He won't lift a finger to get to the truth, if China says NO.

                        NOW you're on to something! All 193 members of the UN collaborated to inflame the world-wide populace into ousting Donald Trump! From the smallest, most backward country to the likes of China, Russia, Iran, and even N Korea! Once sworn enemies, they have come together to pull the wool over the world's population about this COVID-19 thing... and all to ensure Trump didn't win re-election!

                        Why, it's the most impressive conspiracy I've ever even heard of! Even Alien Invaders wouldn't get such a unified response from every-single-country in the world!

                        You're delusional (or an idiot... or both)

                        raphjd 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • raphjd
                          raphjd Forum Administrator @bi4smooth last edited by

                          @bi4smooth

                          More proof the liberals are total idiots.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0

                          • 1 / 1
                          • First post
                            Last post