@raphjd:

The US no longer needs Puerto Rico.    It has no strategic value with modern warfare, which is why we "needed" it originally.

Most Puerto Ricans don't seem to like the US much, even the ones living in the US.

I have also found that to be true.  But I don't quite understand it.  I took a look at the streets of Puerto Rico with Google Maps.  It is.. a DUMP.  Just about every state has it's good and bad parts.  I could find no good parts in Puerto Rico other than the parts with no people living there.  It has some beautiful mountains, etc. 
As for the developed parts.. it is all quite run down, and doesn't have many stores of any significance.  The only buildings worth a damn are the hotels.

I bet they have very lax drug laws.  Not many drug addicts would like to fall under federal jurisdiction.

As for this sad little group with "bleed" issues, it's simply woman-hatred, and I can only hope your mothers, sisters, etc. never became aware of your ugly, ugly misogyny.

You need to explain how it's "woman-hatred" to complain about bleed pay.

Clearly, you view any comment that disagrees with special rights for women as misogyny.  That makes you a good little feminist cuck.

If you support bleed pay, then you HATE gender equality.

It was removed from the homepage because the liberals kept whining (and lying) about it.      We (site owner and myself) agreed that it would be less hassle to remove it from the homepage.

@raphjd:

BLM is so entitled that they feel that they can hijack anything and everything.

Ok, it's an off shoot of BLM called No Justice No Pride.   They don't care about the LGBT community, just the bullshit BLM narrative.

Last year they hijacked the Orland shooting vigil and turned it into a racist anti white people thing.

More proof of black privilege.

I think BLM is actually hurting the democraps.  The people who support BLM were already democraps.. but by going public with a visible group called "Black Lives Matter", they have ignited the resolve of the right to actually vote instead of staying at home.

She probably had her name legally changed and moved like the Vatican does with priests. Priests and judges wear the same Geneva robe.

it's basically another hawaii meaning it wont do squat in the grand scheme of things. christ you lib***** are desperate for any shred of hope

:police: Please follow the rules.  :police:
 Use of a banned word.  See the rules for the section.

It's traditional for the out going President not to interfere with major foreign or domestic policy during the transition.    Of course, emergencies are the exception but it's almost always with the agreement with the in coming President.

Clearly, Obama violated this tradition.

Applies to the US;

During draft times,  it was acceptable to for the military to draft known/admitted gays.    Once the conflict was over or they were let go for medical reasons, they then used their homosexuality against them and gave them a Bad Conduct Discharge.    No matter how honourable their service was, they get a BCD simply for being gay.

Under Clinton's Don't Ask, Don't Tell,  discharges for being gay skyrocketed.    During this period, people were given Other than Honorable, under Honorable Conditions discharges.    The reason for dischares for being gay skyrocketed, was that while technically the military was not allowed to go on witch hunts, anyone could claim you told them you were gay and that was proof enough for a discharge.  Being gay was still considered not honourable, so your word was worthless than a hetero soldier's word.

Any gay type sex was enough to get you thrown out.  So "bro-jobs" and the like would have gotten you thrown out.

And Trumpkins thought that their guy would change the Republican party, but no, the party changed him.

Queer for Muslims = Nazi Jew.

Nothing is more stupid and hypocritical than a SJW.

@raphjd:

What is SPB?

Seed point bonus.

Like the points you get for seeding, every time you make a thread or post in the forums you get points.

Oh.. I got 13,020 SPB…  I better start posting more!  That isn't enough!  :crazy2:

@raphjd:

There's not enough info in the articles I can find over the facts of the story.

So you equate wearing weaves or not, as oppression.    Nobody said you had to wear a weave.

The dress code is the dress code.  They violated the dress code, then got butt hurt over the fact that they got punished for it.

In my high school, guys could not wear short but girls could.   The same goes with sleeveless tops.    Guys are oppressed.

In my high school.. guys could not wear shorts.. but I did anyway.. and NOBODY ever dared to write me up for it because I was one of the top 3 students in the school of 2500 students.  Now, give me my thumbs down Sutieday!  I'm waiting for it!

A funny thing though.. there was no rule against culottes, which are shorts that go below the knee… so a lot of guys were wearing culottes meant for girls as a protest.
Eventually, they came up with a crazy rule where you could wear shorts, IF your GPA was high enough.

Lesbians are easier to convince that all men are evil.

Communications between the President and staff (especially Senior staff) are virtually always treated as confidential.