There has been zero evidence of collusion or any wrongdoing on #45's behalf, yet he's constantly trying to discredit the investigations that are ongoing. Russia meddled in our 2016 election, as they've done in other countries. The vast majority of Republicans and Democrats are actually on the same page with respect to that fact. Our president and some of his cabinet members (with the exception of UN Ambassador Nikki Haley) are still pushing back against something that not only both parties have reached consensus on, but so has the overwhelming majority of Americans. The American president is going against the overwhelming majority of the American people on this issue. No evidence has been provided showing he did anything wrong, yet he is going against the very people he is supposed to represent. Why is he doing this and how long does he think he has before this whole thing goes deeper?

I don't think Trump has actually ran his company in a very long time.  He is a failed businessman several times over.  I believe the actual running of the company was taken away from him a long time ago and he is merely the spokesman.  He claims to have a "real estate" empire but he doesn't actually own much.  He just lends his name to the buildings because people are fooled into thinking his name is synonymous with luxury.

That being said, your point remains.  He is in a position to enrich himself although it's not that different from what Congress does.  They routinely engage in insider trading which isn't illegal in Congress.  They all leave Congress as millionaires.

Being unpopular has never bothered Republicans.  The only way they win elections is via gerrymandering, fraud or manipulation of their feeble minded voters.

Your cynicism is unappreciated.

There is no controversy here for liberals, conservatives, muslims Mexicans or illegals.

The accused will stand trial.  If convicted he will be sentenced. When, (if ever) he completes his sentence, he will be deported.  We do not deport convicted criminals. To do so would be tantamount to releasing them without punishment.

How could you even think that there would be a shred of doubt in this case.  Or were you making a snide joke?

If it was on YouTube, it would have been caught, just like they did with CNN.

CNN still downplayed her message, in the "corrected" reporting.

CNN had an agenda in the way they originally edited and reported the story.

They only "fixed" it because they got caught, not because it was the honest thing to do.

@raphjd:

There is certainly more evidence backing that up than 3 million illegal votes.

Which is why liberals are terrified to allow the investigation.   :crazy2:

We've litigated this before.  I will make a prediction . the commission will find no evidence of massive voter fraud, but will impose onerous new regulations, designed to suppress the vote, "to ensure the integrity of our elections in the future."  It will mention nothing about attempted cyber intrusion and recommend nothing to prevent it.

Believing that gays don't deserve equality, of any kind, is prejudice.

It was funny that for 30'ish years, in the UK, I couldn't get married but muslims could have 5 wives, despite the law banning bigamy and polygamy.  Special rights for some, while denying equal rights to others.

@pppucci:

The argument made by the former AG is ridiculous.  If it were true that a statement by the president of support for a person under investigation, than not only would Obama be guilty, but Trump would be guilty ten-fold.  How many times has he said that Michael Flynn was good guy who was treated unfairly?  How many times has he stated there was no collusion?  How many times has he called the Russia investigation a hoax?  If that is not "signalling" the Justice Department as to how he wants the investigation to turn out?
We all know that if the FBI determined that Hillary should be indicted and Loretta Lynch refused to, that information would have been leaked, or Comey himself would have made a statement

Second..

😄

At first, I was pleasantly surprised when I got a breaking news alert on my phone that Trump had brought up the issue with Puitin.  I was at work and couldn't read more.

In diplomacy, words are chosen very carefully and every word counts.

Tillerson said. "The President brought up the concerns of the American people regarding Russian meddling in our electoral process.  Putin denied it."

Then the Russian side claimed that Trump had accepted Putin's denial.  A White House "source" said that it wasn't true, but neither Tillerson nor Trump has made a follow-up statement.  Trump did not hold a news conference at the end of the summit.

Ivanka Trump is not my president!

I think the correlation is too broad.  There is no evidence that the guy attacked in Philadelphia because he would not "bow" to liberals. I am sure he either got in their fgace, or was attacked by thugs who were just looking for an excuse to commit violence.

As for the post that I thought has misplaced bracket, your reply to my post appears in the same grey box as my quoted post.  Since it is not in a black background, it does not appear as a reply, but as part of the my quted post.  I know those words are not mine. It looks to me like you wrote your reply above the
"" code.

I don't doubt there are some racist whites on there, but I doubt they have the numbers Gazi, Cynthia G and others have.

I would get banned if I had a black stooge behind me being my total cuck and I called him the black version of "toilet complexioned cave beast", like Gazi does.

@mhorndisk:

I just want to briefly say that I believe the issue of agriculture is something to be discussed regarding policies that affect politics, as our lawmakers work with such agencies as the USDA, especially since global warming is a big piece of it. I didn't necessarily bring that piece in originially, because I knew it would come about. If you like to eat chicken, like some of you have stated, so does Trump, and I don't hate either of you for it. I do believe that it is better for our bodies to stop shoveling meat into our mouths (unless it's cock of course) so much, it is better for the environment, and it is the leading cause of environmental destruction. I also have been critical of Leonardo DiCaprio and other Limousine Liberals on here. So here I will agree with the liberal side on this, and not so much with Trump. That's all I wanted to say. I can't even say something that shows I'm not necessarily your enemy without being ganged up on, so I am going to focus on other stuff because it really seems kinda pointless.

Nobody ganged up on you dude.  If you had brought up the agriculture/global warming aspect no one would have protested its presence on this board.  The other jokes were about the subject in general and not made at your expense.  It didn't help that this was one of the umpteenth in a day, including some with very inflammatory titles.  I think you will find your posts better received if you keep them fewer and focused.  Otherwise, the human reaction is to tune out.
And remember not everyone here, or maybe  even most people here will not agree with you.  Don't take it personally.  If you don't attack me personally, I won't attack you personally.

@Devken:

And this is why you don't want conservative christians religious fundamentalists dictating laws, this is why the law should be based on secular and humanist principles. El Salvador has a problem.

Absolutely.

Hooray Antifa!  ::)

@Frederick:

@aadam101:

Why hasn't Trump locked her up?

I guess he was just saying all that stuff to get gullible people to vote for him.  It worked.

He might still.  He's being a nice guy right now.  A moonbat would never let anybody off the hook for anything.  Trump is being an extremely good sport.

As Mae West used to say, "Goodness had nothing to do with it." It just is not politically advantageous to do so right now.  I agree with you, Frederick that he may in the future, especially if he needs to shore up his base.  There is such deep-seated hatred of her in some groups that goes back 30 years.  Trump knows he can pump that well whenever he wants.
P.S.  I am impressed with your cooler tone, and I thank you for that. But at the risk of asking too much, how hard would it be to call us liberals or leftists instead of "moonbats?"  We all know of your disdain.  You don't need to use a deprecative noun in every post.

@mhorndisk:

Your assertion is meaningless.

It's the report authors' assertion — not mine. To the extent that their assertion and report were both evidently meaningless to you, I have no doubt.

I think it was clear from its formation that this commission was going to validate Trump's allegation and use it to support voter suppression in the very states that gave Hillary her plurality.  Can you imagine a group chaired by Mike Pence doing anything else?  the greatest privilege of his life is serving the president.

@flozen:

@Devken:

@pppucci:

"When you're Vice-President, you can do anything–Grab'em by the nuts!"

… and bolts.

pppucci and Devken, you share honors for funniest photo caption of the day.   :laugh:   And tip of the hat to sutieday for topic generation.

Once I heard that Pence, in younger days, had experience pulling on big levers, but I credit that to the despicable liberal rumor mill, of course.   ::)

I bet his lever is tiny. ;D