We are well versed in your profession's push to promote child fucking because we are against it.
Prior to 25 years ago when your profession started pushing MAP, you losers pushed plain old child fucking. You didn't try to hide your agenda.
I still say you are a liar or the dumbest fucktard on the planet that you had no clue about what your profession has been doing all these years.
He claims that he only recently (from me) heard the term MAP.
This is even though it's his fellow professors who have been pushing that term for the last 25ish years.
He's the most clueless person I've ever met. Everyone else knows things going on within their own profession.
Hunter's laptop had information about the President of the US being dirty.
10% for the big guy - for a start
From memory, the number of unindicted co-conspirators (all unnamed) was about 80% of the entire group.
I think you are referring to the ones directly employed by the gov, while I'm referring to their CIs and whatnot as well.
Whitmer kidnapping plot was around 80% gov agents.
WAIT, are you seriously saying that hiding Hunter's laptop from Congressional subpoena isn't dirty?
If the tables were turned, you'd be screaming bloody murder.
Hopefully this time next year, we'll see liberal heads rolling.
Isn't Ray Epps also a "member" of Patriot Front?
The study was about how conservatives were supposed to be the evil ones, but it found that you losers are 3 times worse.
It's like how liberal women have the highest rate of mental illness and conservative men have the lowest, as found in at least 2 studies.
It reminds me of when the German gov did a study on DV and found that 70% of one-sided DV was by the woman. Harvard lost their liberal rag and wanted to prove that totally wrong. Instead, Harvard came out with slightly (1 or 2%) higher results.
Ah, you are talking about dirty Merrick Garland.
You're talking about the FBI supposedly not knowing where Hunter's laptop was.
You are talking about a lot of things that as a liberal, you don't seem to know about.
Butt it does show a pattern of behavior by the DOJ/FBI.
Maybe you forgot how Eric Strok changed the report about Killary so that it said she didn't have a criminal mindset when she intentionally violated the Congressional subpoena.
Maybe you forgot that her lawyer, Sussman, had an all-access pass in the FBI building.
@jaroonn said in Trump highlights Biden admin authorizing ‘deadly use of force’ in Mar-a-Lago raid:
@raphjd said in Trump highlights Biden admin authorizing ‘deadly use of force’ in Mar-a-Lago raid:
The DOJ isn't taking Dems to Grand Juries. That's the problem.
Because they've got NOTHING. Ask Gym Jordan and Foghorn Comer
Congress doesn't prosecute people. They have to rely on the dirty DOJ to do that.
You're proof that modern college is a scam.
The DOJ isn't taking Dems to Grand Juries. That's the problem.
If I intentionally destroyed 33k emails that were under Congressional subpoena, my ass would be in prison.
The is never-ending.
BTW, you remind me of those liberal women, especially professors, who scream and screech because they have nothing.
Your tampon would explode if judges did the same thing to a Democrat that they are doing to Trump.
As I have said before, you are butt hurt that Trump overvalued his property, but silent that Jon Stewart and others have also done it. You don't believe in equality under the law, but rather lawfare against conservatives, especially Trump. That is how fucked up you and your ilk are
You can find the Abstract and other links to the study here;
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00224545.2024.2316619
ABSTRACT
This study tested the notion of ideological asymmetry, which proposes that conservatives are more prejudiced than liberals. It involved 682 self-identified conservative (n = 383) and liberal (n = 299) perceivers (MTurk workers; 54% female) who evaluated a target person’s professional attributes, personal character, and job suitability based on the target’s social media posts. The results did not support ideological asymmetry as both conservative and liberal participants negatively evaluated an ideologically opposite target. Interestingly, liberals showed three times more bias than conservatives. This study better supports a worldview conflict hypothesis, an alternative to ideological asymmetry, with both sides showing indirect aggression in an apolitical setting.
NOTE: Bolding by me.
Eugenics is only a part of it.
She was a racist, as well.
She wanted to exterminate the black race.
Margaret Sanger was a total POS, but she's worshipped by liberals.
Are you serious?
We've had people run for DA and Congress with the sole stated goal of getting Trump.
Democrats have long been protected.
