Posts made by raphjd

Feminists and their cucks only want gender equality in ways that suits women.  They have no fucking interest in real gender equality.

Feminists want 50/50 in the boardroom, but don't fucking dare mention the Sanitation Dept not being 50/50.

Hillary is extremely horrible, especially her idiotic feminist comments.  Blame penis all you want on her not getting elected, but it was all her and that crackhead liberal race baiting, identity politics and whatnot that turned so many people off.

The First Minister of Scotland, Nicola Sturgeon, is a feminist and for a decade she has done nothing to bring gender equality to Scotland.  Sure, she's brought feminism and feminist laws, but she has refused to give Scotland gender equality.    This has happened in other countries too.

Feminists created all kinds of lunatic bullshit like; stare-rape, talk-rape, birth-rape, lie-to-a-gold-digger-for-sex-rape, man-spreading, man-splaining and countless other things just to have something to bitch about and pretend to be victims.

Feminists pull fire alarms to prevent lectures on men's health issues.  The riot to prevent a lecture on male suicide.  They prevent men from having a safe space on campus.

Feminists hate MRAs, but constantly fight against gender equality and men's issues.

Even feminist cucks occasionally break ranks and admit that feminists/ism has no interest in men's issues.  It's only about the vag.

:police:  Feel free to post away.  :police:

This applies to everyone from whatever political leaning.

@royalcrown89:

@raphjd:

I am calm.  Not sure why you'd say I'm not.

RC is claiming guilt by association, while ignoring his side's guilt by association.  Actually, he's demanding  :blink: that the topic is forbidden in HIS thread.

How is asking you to refute my claims "ignoring my side's guilt?" What you are trying to do is minimize what this topic is about by bringing an irrelevant argument. Like I've said, I made an argument backed up by reputable sources and instead of providing your own sources to refute those claims, you tried to deflect and you never even attempted to refute my claims. You know what that means? 95-98% of what you say is wholly irrational based on either some mild form of mental illness or just old-fashioned racism. Hard to discern which it is or if it's a combination of both. <<< my standard reply to you from now on (I gave you ample chances this time)

LOL, you are still nothing but a sad little person.

I'm only refuting your guilt by association.  If it applies to your enemies, then it applies to your side as well.

By your logic; you worship a Congressman who is a proven liar, therefore you are a proven liar.

@royalcrown89:

Yeah, this is all relevant because Hillary Rodham Clinton is president right now. You people are impossible.

How so?

She is a public political figure so we can talk about her.

I am calm.  Not sure why you'd say I'm not.

RC is claiming guilt by association, while ignoring his side's guilt by association.  Actually, he's demanding  :blink: that the topic is forbidden in HIS thread.

Women in the west are not oppressed.  They are privileged.  I have constantly shown female privilege and you ignore it so you can claim that women are oppressed without any giving any examples.

Women elsewhere are oppressed, but feminists care about them as much as they care about men.

Other western countries have had women leaders.  So maybe no decent woman has run for US President.    We already talked about the video of Justin Trudeau talking about how hard it is to get women  to run for politics.

Are you saying we need to do what Trudeau did and make 50% of the cabinet women regardless of experience and expertise?

@alibix:

@raphjd:

LOL, you don't like me not obeying your demands to only Trump hate, so I'm irrational.  Gotta love it.  :cheers:

If those that voted for Trump are X, Y and Z because they voted for Trump, then the same for those that voted for Hillary.

Just because Hillary didn't win, means nothing.  You and anyone who supported her hate gays and women, because Saudi Arabia supported her.

Saudi Arabia donated to the Clinton Foundation charity. So did many other countries. Norway gave more money than Saudi Arabia too.

The Clinton Foundation which used that money to help disenfranchised individuals all around the world get access to medication for HIV/AIDs and malaria and also set up networks that provide accessible and equitable healthcare.

Trump on the other hand registered eight companies in Saudi Arabia during his campaign while at the same time saying that he would never take Saudi money. He is also in talks with Mr. Son, who runs a front for Saudi money to the tune of $100 billion dollars, 45 billion of which is Saudi. This will allow Saudi money to take over many companies in Sillicon Valley.

Is doing business directly with the royal family, or letting Saudi investors take control of American companies the same fucking thing as using Saudi money to fund solutions for healthcare?

AND?  Trump is a douche bag, so what?!

RC doesn't care about any of that, he just wants to scream "racism" at white people.

Saudi is still killing gays and women, regardless if they give money to the Clinton charity.  So Hillary isn't as innocent as you want us to think.

NOPE.  You do not get to control this topic.

You said anyone who voted for or supported Trump is guilty by extension.  Of course I'm not surprised at all that you're butt hurt because I use that same logic against you.

Since that is your claim, then it applies in all cases.  Or are you just doing this to scream "racism" again?

AND AGAIN, you don't get to dictate what is and is not allowed in this thread.

Wait, we have to vote for a person just because they have a vagina, regardless how crap they are.  If women wanted Hillary to be President, she would be President since women are the biggest voting block.

What's wrong?  Don't you like using your movement against you?  Feminists create bullshit "oppression" to stay valid, because they have no real issues to complain about.

I have pointed out actual female privilege and all you give is "but Hillary wasn't elected".

Yeah, "trolling" again.  More pathetic left bullshit because they can't have a debate on issues.

LOL, you don't like me not obeying your demands to only Trump hate, so I'm irrational.  Gotta love it.  :cheers:

If those that voted for Trump are X, Y and Z because they voted for Trump, then the same for those that voted for Hillary.

Just because Hillary didn't win, means nothing.  You and anyone who supported her hate gays and women, because Saudi Arabia supported her.

I haven't heard of that being the law, but 50 states with their own laws so you never know.

In Texas, you can't have an adult bookstore (wink, wink) within a certain distance from a school, church and a few other places.

@Dene:

@raphjd:

The problem is, the left refuse to do anything other than get violent.   They don't want a dialogue.  They only want to silence those who disagree with them.

Besides, where were the "alt-right" people at the women's march?   Kinda hypocritical to say that one side should do something, when the other side won't.

I also notice that I always get a thumbs down when I point out the extreme hypocrisy of the left.

you troll the crap out of people on a gay torrent site then want hugs?

you reap what you sow..

Wait, what exactly did I say wrong in any of that?

The left hates dialogue and debate.  Instead they would rather pull fire alarms to prevent a lecture on men's health, riot to prevent a lecture on male suicide, and riot and set fire to a building that people are in to prevent speech they don't like.  The left beats up people they ASSUME disagree with the left's narrative.  No proof needed, you are guilty of wrong think if the left thinks you're guilty.  If you are deemed guilty, it's ok to enact physical violence on you, even after you are laying unconscious and bloody on the road.  The left thinks it's acceptable to pour a bottle of piss on someone, just because they don't agree with "unlimited genders".  Feminist cucks don't mind punching women, if they ask the wrong questions.  The left doesn't mind physically attacking a retired couple out walking their dog because they look like they support free speech.

Like so many words, the left has made "trolling" lose all of it's meaning.    Any disagreeing with the left's narrative is classed as "trolling" by the left.

Instead of crying "he's trolling", try debating the issue.  Instead of being a total coward, defend your position.

And you proved one of my points; the gay hive mind.

Your "reality" is clearly in a feminist mindset.

You ignore everything I have pointed out that shows female privilege, while not giving me anything showing that women are oppressed in the west.  By "oppressed" I mean something real, not crap like "birth rape" and "man-splaining".

The Chair of the council I'm on is a woman.  Oh NO, she's oppressed by the glass ceiling.    :crazy2:  In fact, of the 5 council officers, only the Secretary is male.  The other 4 are women.    Damned, you are right, women are oppressed.  :blind:

I have pointed out actual things that show female privilege and all you have is crap like "stare rape".

Maybe in 30 years the CIA, NSA or whoever will be honest and admit they did it.

You are clearly under the delusion that all conspiracy theories are either proven immediately or they are are fake.    Thanks to Bill Clinton declassifying a ton of documents, we found out that a lot of decades old conspiracy theories were in fact true.

I'm not saying this is true, just pointing out that not all conspiracy theories are false.

You don't get to demand what this topic is about.

You said that anyone who supports Trump supports white supremacy.

So by your logic, you support beheading gays and stoning women because you support Hillary.

You just want to name call those you disagree with, without them pointing out your bullshit.    As I pointed out, if you can call Trump supporters "white supremacists", then others are fully within their rights to call Hillary supporters whatever they want as well.

Trump cannot prove it.. that's the end of it.. but noone is asking him to, as usual, he can say anything and people will lap it up

Obama may well be a liar but denying something that that cannot be proven to be true is not automatically a lie.. it's like a bad case of gossip.. Trump just needs to provide proof.. or shutup

Here's a bit of history for you.

Harold Wilson (then UK PM) claimed that Russia was spying on him, because that is what MI5 told him.  Later HW went on to claim that it was actually MI5 who was spying on him to ruin his government.    MI5 denied all this and branded HW as a lunatic.

Fast forward 30 years and MI5 admitted that everything Harold Wilson said was in fact true.

fascists   ::)

It's another word that has lost all meaning due to the left throwing it at everyone they disagree with.

Of course he himself leaked it.

The Guardian is a far left rag.

CNN is fake news.  Don Lemon and his usual guests whore for the left.

BULLSHIT.  If you are claiming that Trump supporters are guilty of thought crimes by association, then so are you.  You don't get to accuse others of something, without it affecting you too.

Just because a person like you says something is irrelevant, doesn't mean it is.  That's just your bogus claim.

Using your logic, you are guilty by association of everything Hillary and everyone of her supporters believe.

See, you can't attack my argument, so you attack me.    That says everything about you and your position.