• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. raphjd
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 1
    • Followers 35
    • Topics 2701
    • Posts 12776
    • Best 806
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 2

    Posts made by raphjd

    • RE: TYT hires Talcum X aka the fake black guy Shaun King

      Yeah, he's a crap speaker.  He's not so bad when he has rehearsed script.  He's a pretty good writer though, even if nothing he says or writes can ever be trusted.

      I still don't understand why TYT hired this fraud.  Did they think that hiring him would give them street cred with blacks?  It was blacks who named him Talcum X.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: UC Berkeley at it again

      @koliko6:

      @YoungGun:

      As for the giant chip on your shoulder about the DNC and Berkeley hating white people…it's just bizarre.  I mean apparently you got scarred at some point by a bad experience or you've been programmed by neo-Nazi propaganda to the point that you've lost complete perspective.  Does the left take things too far at times?  Absolutely.  Just like the right.  That's why I'm against extremism in general.  But categorizing entire groups of people as being of a hive mind and that large groups of people hate white people and are trying to keep them down (including other white people)?  You've pretty much jumped the shark on that point.

      I mean Bernie Sander's press secretary and Democratic strategist Symone Sanders was on CNN mocking a white guy that got beat up saying"Oh poor white people" and she said The Democrat party doesn't need white people, fake news sites  like The Hill, Washington Post, Huffington Post have ALL written articles saying basically that The Democratic party doesn't need appeal to white men to win and doesn't care what white men think.

      There's plenty more where she came from too.

      It's funny how liberals will excuse anti white comments and protests, but lose their shit with even the slightest hint of a filthy, no good cracker daring to disagree with a black person regardless of what the topic is.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: UC Berkeley at it again

      @YoungGun:

      (1) The people causing trouble were masked and for all we know they're Milo's or the alt-right's henchmen doing the violence themselves to attempt to discredit peaceful protests from people with legit grievances

      (2) Even if the people who caused trouble were leftist protestors, indicting an entire group of people for the bad actions of a few is not intelligent and leads to over-generalizations and stereotyping.  You position yourself as a victim of left bashing, but you're contributing to the environment of extreme partisanship ruining our country with group-think rhetoric, confirmation bias, and one-dimensional villainizing behavior.  Bad stuff is done by people on the right and the left.  We shouldn't lower ourselves down to the level of the unintelligent members of society (on both sides) but hold ourselves to a higher standard of discourse and conflict resolution.

      (3) Also, free speech =/= being granted the privilege of being able to speak using a large legitimate platform to legitimize hate speech.  Neo-Nazi's have the right to free speech in this country, but this doesn't mean we should be encouraging them to speak at campuses, being given TV spots, etc. either.  Milo has the right to speak his mind about whatever he wants to talk about, but UC Berkeley owes him no special backing to troll at an obvious left-leaning campus just like I am not owed any special right to go to any campus I want and talk about my personal beliefs on my politics or random subjects like video games.  UC Berkley is a prestigious campus and they talk about serious subjects.  They don't owe every joe with an opinion a platform to speak at their campus.  He's lucky they allowed him to come at all in the first place.  And just as he has the right to free speech, the protestors have the right for theirs, and due to his track record, they assumed he was going to spout alt-right propaganda like usual.  Please let's not act like he didn't know exactly what he was doing and then trying to use that for his own political gain.

      1)  WOW, just WOW.  I see you watched that Professor in CNN make his claims that he "heard" it was people hired by Milo.

      1. LOL, modern liberals are all about the hive mind and identity politics.  The DNC is all about race baiting and hating white people.  "My job is to shut other white people down" is how a white candidate running for the Chairmanship of the DNC and all the others candidates loved it.  You can find the video on YouTube.

      3)  You are guilty of what you complained about in #2.  You clearly have no idea how it works for speaking at universities.  He was "invited" by one of the student groups and that group rented the space for the event.

      Yeah, Berkely is a great place, as long as you aren't white.  The university allowed non whites to do the "white people go around" thing, but everyone knows it would have been stopped immediately if the races were reversed.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: UC Berkeley at it again

      and bitching about the violet protestors on a forum doesn't either.

      Ok, let's not have forums at all then.

      If we don't talk about this stuff, then lots of people will claim (as we've seen) that this stuff doesn't actually exist except in the minds of the alt-right complaining about it on the internet.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: UC Berkeley at it again

      Umm, they were smashing up the building Milo was in and setting it on fire to prevent him from speaking.

      I guess the girl who got pepper sprayed while speaking to the media wasn't prevented from speaking either, she just chose to stop doing the interview because of a minor thing.

      I guess the 2 "nazis" could have left and the fact that they got beated down and were repeated beaten, 1 while unconscious on the ground.

      Talk about liberal apologetics.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: UC Berkeley at it again

      @aadam101:

      I don't think he got them all but he likely got most of the fraudulent votes.  He did win after all and he did tell us it was rigged.

      I think you mean; rigged like the DNC primary so Hillary would win.

      I think you mean; rigged like in the mass media ignoring stories that made Hillary and liberals look bad.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: UC Berkeley at it again

      @rawr:

      @raphjd:

      The problem is, the left refuse to do anything other than get violent.   They don't want a dialogue.  They only want to silence those who disagree with them.

      Come on man, play fair. I don't see Nancy Pelosi pulling out her boxing gloves. I get that you don't agree but that statement isn't true. The majority of the protests were completely peaceful and lawful. I don't agree with the violent protests that have been occurring, that's wrong, but suggesting that all liberals refuse to do anything other than get violent is far from stretching the truth.

      Milo Yiannopoulos is a troll. He has said it many times. He's not necessarily saying what he says because he believes it, he says it because he knows it riles people up. Personally, when I watch the guy, I just laugh at him. Some of things that come out his mouth are so ridiculous that I can't take him seriously. A migrant homosexual who dates African American men is a major voice in the Alt Right?

      Wow, get trolled harder…

      BUT, it was liberals that said that if Trump lost, the alt right would riot and do all manner of violence.   And here you guys are doing exactly what you said about your opponents.

      I noticed that you guys love to cover your faces too.  Be proud in what you do.

      I've also been seeing liberals justifying the violence by their side.

      The DNC is on the verge of being nothing but white haters.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: UC Berkeley at it again

      @aadam101:

      73 million people voted for someone else.  Plus if you add in the 3-5 million fraudulent votes he claims there were then the gap is even wider.

      The difference between Trump and the other 3 candidates combines was 2% of the US population.

      You can't honestly say that only Trump got fraudulent votes.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: BMA says women no longer get pregnant, people do

      @Spintendo:

      Sorry to disappoint you Henny Penny—but the sky is not falling.  :cheerup:

      This suggestion came about when a pregnant patient born anatomically female but who identifies as male did not wish to be called "mother" several times during his visit with clinicians. An advisory notice was circulated, gently reminding clinicians that these rare instances can occur, and suggested not using labels like mother when interacting with them.

      But 1 person requires a rule change?

      Will they add "attack helicopter" to the tick box list for sex?  If not, why not?

      Why won't the BMA bow down to me and tell everyone to refer to my hair color as  "similar to a sofa I once saw"?

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: UC Berkeley at it again

      The difference was less than 1% of the US population.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • BMA says women no longer get pregnant, people do

      https://www.pinknews.co.uk/2017/01/29/doctors-urged-to-use-gender-neutral-pregnant-people-instead-of-mothers/

      Doctors urged to use gender neutral ‘pregnant people’ instead of ‘mothers’

      Let's not forget that SJWs claim that SJWs only exist in the minds of their critics and things like this don't actually happen in real life.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: UC Berkeley at it again

      The problem is, the left refuse to do anything other than get violent.  They don't want a dialogue.  They only want to silence those who disagree with them.

      Besides, where were the "alt-right" people at the women's march?  Kinda hypocritical to say that one side should do something, when the other side won't.

      I also notice that I always get a thumbs down when I point out the extreme hypocrisy of the left.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Trump just tweeted about 'Islamic terror' attack that killed 0\.

      :police:  Please tone down the language.

      Polite/civil discussion please.  :police:

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Does anyone have NORMAL sex anymore?

      I have no fetishes.

      posted in Rants & Raves
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Bonus Seed Point whore

      :police: Officially, we have no problem with asking for seed points when uploading a torrent, as long as all the other rules are followed.  :police:

      :police: Spamming the forums will get you muted so you can't post on the forums any more, but can still use the site.  :police:

      On a personal note, I have no problem with whoring as long as it doesn't go over the top.  We had/have a member that put "bonus points appreciated" at the bottom of every upload he did and no complained. In fact, he routinely got bonus points from other members.

      posted in Rants & Raves
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • UC Berkeley at it again

      We already had the "white people go around" where mostly blacks formed a "wall" preventing white people from crossing the bridge to access the campus.  This meant that white students had to walk through a creek to get to class.

      Now we have the riots and violence, thanks to the peace loving left, just because they wanted to prevent the free speech rights of Milo, a gay jew migrant who loves black men.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Trump Supporters’ #BoycottStarbucks Attempt Backfires Spectacularly

      Boycotts are always stupid when the other side does them.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Just when you lost faith in the FBI, they may do the right thing!

      It's more offensive for her to totally ignore the very real issues that men face, as well as claiming that women are the real victims of war.    More war dogs died in any single American war than all the female soldiers in all American wars combined.

      Also, feminists don't give a shit about women in non western countries, that's why they need to make up shit like "man-spreading" to have something to fight for.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • RE: Republicans Quietly Admit There Will Be No Obamacare Replacement

      I've always been asked if I smoke or not when buying health/life insurance.    The only time it's not an issue is when it's paid for through work.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • Man sues Verizon for $72m for not stopping him committing ID theft

      https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2017/01/06/man-sues-verizon-for-72m-for-not-stopping-him-committing-id-theft/?utm_source=Naked+Security+-+Sophos+List&utm_campaign=8b54816116-naked%252Bsecurity&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_31623bb782-8b54816116-454982277

      Man sues Verizon for $72m for not stopping him committing ID theft

      Well, besides the main topic of the article, there's this;

      ..well, that plus a criminal history dating back to 1985 that includes grand theft with a firearm and at least 37 convictions on charges including rental property fraud, trafficking in stolen property, and receiving money through fraudulent use of a credit card.

      How in the fuck is he not in prison for all those convictions?!

      posted in General News
      raphjd
      raphjd
    • 1
    • 2
    • 534
    • 535
    • 536
    • 537
    • 538
    • 638
    • 639
    • 536 / 639