Posts made by raphjd

:police: No more threads like this, from either side.  :police:

@mhorndisk:

None of us want to go to a Sharia law nation. Because we all know that it sucks there. It's hell. It's prison. It's death. Keep that in mind.

So true.

Can any liberal explain why Lilly Allen needed a mass of body guards to go to "the jungle" ("refugee" camp in Calais)  if muslims are so peaceful?

Is it a lay-off or job transfer to Mexico?

Economic downturns happen.

Of course, corporate greed will always be there.

Muslims want us dead, simply for being gay.   They want us dead simply for not being muslim.  They simply want us dead for being western.

If anyone actually took the time to read the holy texts of islam, they would see just how evil the religion is.     We are constantly lied to that islam is the religion of peace.

Muslims kill each other based on their holy texts.   Many of the justifications are the same ones they use for killing us.

From the article;

Devine has run for office, consulted for numerous New Jersey campaigns, and worked in the offices of state lawmakers.

So, he's not simply a blogger like you wanted us to believe.

The Huffington Post who purged male employees under the guise of "gender equality", but apparently doesn't hire blacks.

The video uses TYT (aka The Young Turks) which is named after the group that committed the Armenian genocide and the channel officially denies the AG happened.    Ironically, it was the AG which a polish jew (Raphael Lemkin) coined the term genoicide.

Also, a guy stabbing a black homeless man is a hate crime, not a terrorist act.

Speaking of hate crimes, whites are rarely treated as victims of the crimes, even when the perpetrators admit they did it out of hate.  We saw this with "Ah poor poor white people" and "it aint no hate crime" CNN.

We also saw the huge flaw in the way liberal view hate crimes in a thread.  A muslim woman is attacked, so that's 2 hate crimes according to liberals.    A crippled, lesbian, muslim woman with 3 nipples is attacked and that's 5 hate crimes, even if it's a simple mugging with no hateful thoughts.  A mentally disabled white man gets attacked and the 4 attackers admit they did it based on hatered and liberals say it wasn't a hate crime.

I agree. And I think that it is really ironic that many of the countries on Trump's travel ban have been bombed by the U.S. and now their people won't be able to seek refuge in the U.S.

It was your lord and saviour who bombed them.  Are you saying he did it without a valid reason?!

You need to decide, was Obama wrong to do it or not.

Tucker Carlson interviewed a Democrat who, within hours of the shooting, did #HuntRepublicans and #HuntRepublicanCongressmen.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2017/06/16/nj-democratic-strategist-launches-huntrepublicans-and-huntrepublicancongressmen.html

I hated the oompa loompas in the new one.

SHIT, SHIT, SHIT

I made a long post and it got deleted when I clicked "post".  :blownose:

I completely agree on the main point.

I haven't looked into "pizza-gate" but it seemed fake to me.  But that's not the point.  No one has the right to do what the gunman did.

Willie Wonka was supposed to be "dark" from the beginning.  It was never supposed to be a remake of the Gene Wilder movie.    I like him as an actor.  I haven't really paid attention to him as a person.

ANYONE who says shit like this, regardless of who the target is, should be prosecuted under incitement laws.

Those same things are illegal in Europe/Canada.  So it's not really a big deal.

Several EU countries ban holocaust denial.

Several EU countries and Canada ban criticism of islam.

The UK's libel/slander laws are guilty until proven innocent.

Causing offense is a criminal act in most of the EU, and probably Canada.

Canada criminalizes speech that misgenders a person, even if the person doesn't present as that gender.  It also forces people to use made up words (pronouns) as chosen by the individual.

Several EU countries and Canada ban racist speech.

The list is seemingly never ending of banned speech.

http://www.msn.com/en-gb/lifestyle/style/man-sent-home-from-work-for-wearing-shorts-in-30c-heat-goes-back-to-office-in-his-mums-dress/ar-BBCYPkm?ocid=spartandhp

Feminists screech about girls having a dress code that prevents them from wearing what they want.    I have never seen this.

In school and at work women have always been able to wear what they want, while guys have restricted dress codes.

In school, girls could wear all manner of things.  Guys were restricted to shirts with sleeves and long pants.  So while girls could wear shoulder-less tops, guys had to wear, at minimum, short sleeve shirts.  Girls could wear short dresses (not vag showing), but guys had to wear long pants.

Except for my job at a men's clothing store,  my work experience is exactly the same.  Women got to wear pretty much whatever they wanted, while guys had a strict dress code.

Feminist DO NOT fight for equality where men are disadvantaged, but they say that MRAs are evil.  Men can't win for losing with these cunts and their cucks.

@strangeloop:

You are absolutely correct, SCOTUS has always upheld freedom of speech, even when the speech is considered a threatening opinion or hate speech.  It is a ruling against liberals because it is liberals who are trying to eliminate and curtail freedom of speech - in the U.S. as well as Europe.  I can cite many examples if you are interested.

Only the US has freedom of speech.  The rest of the west has all kinds of bans and restrictions on speech.

I'm actually a classic liberal, but I refuse to call myself a liberal due to the bullshit identity politics we've seen over the last 15 or so years.

Also, as an egalitarian, I despise feminism.

@  RoyalCrown89 - The fist picture does have a lot of baggage and that's what the reaction is based on.  It's not derailment to complain about the picture in a thread about being civil.

@ Strangeloop - RC is probably the most centrist liberal here.  While he may be a bit SJW on some topics, he's far from a bike lock liberal.  He advocates for true free speech as defined by the USSC and condemns the violence by both sides.

@raphjd:

Children are allowed to be attacked, but only if they themselves have done wrong.     "Sins of the father" type stuff is banned.

"Attack" in this case means criticize/critical of.   This is things like GWB's daughters underage drinking with secret service protection.

You are not allowed to do baseless attacks on kids because of their parents.

LibDem  are basically the SJW party and their leader is a homophobe.

Labour has turned into a quasi communist party under it's current leader.    The top 3 people in the party support terrorism.  They refuse to condemn their praise of the IRA's terrorism and they are quick to downplay muslim terrorism.    Usually, they are like the Democrats.

Tories are the conservative party.  It's pretty much just like the Republicans, with a lot of views on issues.

@aadam101:

The Supreme Court doesn't vote "against" a political party.  That's not their job and not what happened here.

It's liberals that insist that we ban speech that might offend.