You don't want me to focus on black criminality, but you don't mind focusing on white criminality to create a false narrative.
You people even change definitions of words to suit your agenda.
If a black person commits a crime, liberals label it as "white supremacy".
Likewise, when a woman commits a crime they blame the "patriarchy".
Liberals infantilize those they claim to love. You believe they have no agency, so therefore their criminal acts must be the fault of someone else.
LOL
The liberal agenda is to demonize white people, we see that every day on MSM.
The NYTimes hired openly anti-white racist Sarah Jeong to a senior position.
The Root is nothing but anti-white trash trying to pretend to be news.
The list is endless.
Dylann Roof further their agenda, while Emanuel Samson weakens their agenda.
It's like the Chicago kidnapping of the mentally disabled white teen by a group of black teens. The video is extremely clear that it was an anti-white hate crime but they were not charged for that.
It's like how in the UK women can not legally commit most sex crimes, then using the crime stats to say that sex crimes are rarely committed by women.
Israel says that women can not legally commit domestic violence. Not surprisingly, liberals like to use Israel to show that DV is a gendered issue.
The Duluth Model of DV says that even with extreme evidence against the woman, the man is to be removed (arrested). This is used to justify the lie that DV in the west is gendered.
Liberals have their agenda and will use anything, dishonestly, to further their agenda.
Once again, as AOC and others love to say; it's better to be morally right than factually right.
The 1619 Project rewrites history to suit their agenda.
Anti-racism is just anti-white racism.
Ah, I have to use "big words" to please you. Clearly, you know my argument, but because I don't use big words, you ignore my argument.
That says a lot about you.
You clowns love to bring up Trump in conversations that have nothing to do with him.
Until you can admit that your beloved MSM, big tech, and the DNC also committed the same crimes as this chick, then you are just a partisan hack who supports a corrupt legal system.
I know you won't admit it, because you are pathologically unable to.
LOL, says the guy who blatantly ignores your beloved MSM and bid tech doing the same thing.
If she was running a liberal content farm, you'd be worshipping her.
You want me to view her as evil while demanding I ignore MSM, big tech, and the DNC. If it's evil for one to do it, then it's evil for all to do it, but since you are a liberal you can't understand that.
The Roof/Samson cases show how the MSM and big tech is a prime example of how political agenda-driven they are.
There are countless others, like Hunter's laptop. MSM claimed that it was Russian disinformation (as did the 51 "intel expert" liars) only to admit it's real after the election. 16% of Biden voters said they would have not voted for Biden if they had known about it. Big tech banned people for posting about it, including the NYPost and other conservative outlets.
The NYTimes is full of lies. They also hire anti-white racists, serial doxers and many other scumbags.
Have you thought that I might have heard about him via a content farm? I hope you aren't that delusional. I don't live in Tennessee so it would be odd that I would have seen the local coverage, which is where I originally heard about it.
Compare the coverage of Dylan Roof vs Emanuel Samson. Then tell me they treated both stories equally.
FFS, they still mention Dylan Roof constantly as part of their "white supremacy" narrative.
Honest question; Did you know who Dylann Roof was before this discussion? Did you know Emanuel Samson before this discussion?
My bet is that of course, you knew who Dylann Roof is, but you had to google Emanuel Samson.
You are saying this content frm chick is a criminal based on what she has been accused of, by the DOJ/FBI.
I pointed out that MSM, big tech and the DNC have also done those things, but you don't want me talking about that.
I know you are a liberal, but I would have thought you would know that the justice system includes the DOJ and FBI.
You brought the justice system into this thread by bringing in the charges against the chick.
Ah, so you support a one-sided legal system.
Justice is supposed to be blind, not politically motivated.
The justice system you want is the same as we see under dictators.
And yet, when he's asked about it, he doesn't mention it.
Mueller's report and Schift don't seem to say the samething
You are going way off track.
You are screeching about the so-called crimes this woman supposedly committed.
Nothing she did was any different from what MSM and bid tech did.
Just because the DOJ and FBI are dirty as fuck, doesn't change that fact.
Content farms are grerat sources, especially when your beloved MSM and big tech collude to bury and/or ignore stories that don't suit their political agenda.
Once again, Emanuel Samson is a prime example. The white-hating racists at MSM and big tech made sure the world knows about Dylan Roof, while making every possible attempt to make sure no one knows about Emanuel Samson because he's black.
This happens on a regular basis.
MSM & Big Tech colluded (still doing it), with the DNC to spread lies, which interfered with the US political system and the last few elections.
Nice job on quoting the US statute, but it's extremely vague.
You are forgetting that countless people committed the same sort of crimes, to help Democrat politicians and other liberal causes.
I have ZERO faith in the political shit show run by political hacks and 2 losers pretending to be conservatives.
I'm still waiting for Shifty Schiff to produce his "absolute evidence" about Trump colluding with Russia.
When the liberal agenda driven MSM and big tech, actively REFUSE to cover stories that don't match their narrative, then why should I reward them?
Of course, you being a liberal, would reward them for refusing to cover stories (ie; Emanuel Samson and countless others) that don't support the liberal agenda.
USA Today has been caught in quite a few scandals over the last few years, relating to truth and honesty. This is the same with all the MSM.
As AOC loves to remind us, it's better to be morally correct than factually correct.
Just thinking about it, but do you think that she is worse than the MSM, who spent 4 years lying about Trump at every turn?
The MSM/Big Tech colluded to prevent the Hunter Biden laptop from coming to light, until after the election. They interfered with the US political system and the 2020 elections.
Your beloved MSM/big tech should be seen as treasonous for doing what they have spent the last decade doing.
I just read why she was indicted; conspiracy to defraud the US government.
That was related to her vias application.
I think you are referring to the Mueller report bit about her "internet posts "interfered" with the US political system, including the 2016 election." She wasn't indicted for any of that is an actual crime.
If she committed a crime, then so did the MSM, Hillary, Fusion GPS, the DOJ, the FBI, and the 51 "intel experts" liars.
The articles are true. You can look them up on the internet and find the info on other sites.
Your beloved MSM doesn't like to cover certain types of articles, so they are almost impossible to find out about unless you live locally.
I already mentioned a prime example; Dylan Roof vs Emanuel Samson. Despite the situations being 95% the same, with the only real difference being the race of the shooter, MSM totally ignored Emanuel Samson's racist attack on a white church.
You are butt hurt that I found out about it from a "click farm" not the MSM, but are happy that MSM didn't report on it to protect the liberal agenda.
Your entire argument seems to stem from the fact that I'm getting to see news your "news" outlets refuse to talk about.
You don't like the fact that Emanuel Samson's racially motivated terroristic act didn't stay hidden in small-town Tennessee. Likewise with countless other news items.
It reminds me of Morning Joe's ho (Mika or something) when she said that it's the news' job to control what people think. She's said it twice now, with a few years in between.