Topics created by mhorndisk

When you get on the Trump Train we go to your party! We love you! We don't like Hillary or Obummer though. BLAME IT ON THE NIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIII IIIII ITE! DONT BLAME IT ON ME! DON"T BLAME IT ON ME!!!!!

YOU might have won, the USA lost, the World lost. Get over it

@mhorndisk:

Who wants to be part of a new televised series? US? Why not? We are the game changers. Let's talk about it. We kicked all the asses of the liberals. Let's get together and make it a show. Like the View. Who's with me? PM.

Instead of Barbara Walters as the host.. Ted Nugent.  And on the panel.. the late Sam Kinison.

@mhorndisk:

I just want to briefly say that I believe the issue of agriculture is something to be discussed regarding policies that affect politics, as our lawmakers work with such agencies as the USDA, especially since global warming is a big piece of it. I didn't necessarily bring that piece in originially, because I knew it would come about. If you like to eat chicken, like some of you have stated, so does Trump, and I don't hate either of you for it. I do believe that it is better for our bodies to stop shoveling meat into our mouths (unless it's cock of course) so much, it is better for the environment, and it is the leading cause of environmental destruction. I also have been critical of Leonardo DiCaprio and other Limousine Liberals on here. So here I will agree with the liberal side on this, and not so much with Trump. That's all I wanted to say. I can't even say something that shows I'm not necessarily your enemy without being ganged up on, so I am going to focus on other stuff because it really seems kinda pointless.

Nobody ganged up on you dude.  If you had brought up the agriculture/global warming aspect no one would have protested its presence on this board.  The other jokes were about the subject in general and not made at your expense.  It didn't help that this was one of the umpteenth in a day, including some with very inflammatory titles.  I think you will find your posts better received if you keep them fewer and focused.  Otherwise, the human reaction is to tune out.
And remember not everyone here, or maybe  even most people here will not agree with you.  Don't take it personally.  If you don't attack me personally, I won't attack you personally.

Exactly. #VEGAN

@royalcrown89:

President Obama is not being considered for another Nobel Peace Prize. It's something the alt-right has come up with to try to distract us from our current president's historical low approval, and it's sad.

It is not only a distraction.  The only thing that unites such groups with a nihilistic view of the word is opposition to someone.  There is very little positive about their agenda.  It is all about keeping people out of our country and overturning the accomplishments of the last administration.  That's why they keep bringing up Hilary.

@raphjd:

@pppucci:

@raphjd:

They have requested, names, addresses, partial SSN, party affiliation and voting history

Unless the states are doing something illegal, then they have no idea who you voted for.

Australia has mandatory voting and your voting record (not who you voted for) is shared within the government because you are denied benefits and can be sent to jail for not voting.

I don't care if anyone knows I normally vote Democrat.

Liberals love that CNN is threatening to dox a person over a meme, but hate the idea of illegal voters being faux doxed.

I never meant to imply that voting history meant who you voted for.  It just means what elections you did cast votes.  How does that history relate to vote fraud beyond the information if the person in question ever voted.  Actually, I don't that voter suppression, even the suppression of illegal voting is the prime motivator in seeking this information.  They are looking to use it politically, and develop a huge database of party affiliation, who are the most motivated voters, who votes in primary elections, etc.  This will put them on firm footing going into 2020 to direct their campaigns ans spend their advertising dollars efficiently..  I have a strange feeling that they will not share the raw data with the Democrats.  It is just conjecture on my part, but even if it is partially true, it would mean the federal government is being used to further the cause of one political party.

One of the cases of illegal voting in Texas came about through a random check of voting records.    An ex wife had her son vote as the dad, because she didn't want to waste his vote.   The son was 17yo.   Anyway, turns out the dad does vote.     So voter records caught an illegal vote.

Same thing with the illegal woman who voted, also in Texas.  She got caught through the same random voter record check.   The same woman voted in several places.   Turns out the real woman was a victim of identity fraud and illegal women were using her name/identity.

Let's flip this and say it was Obama or Hillary who wanted to do it.   I'm sure you'd support it and claim that everyone who disagreed was a conspiracy theorist.

Also, like with the EPA, there are plenty of regulations and laws surrounding voter's rights and records, so nothing bad will happen.    :blind:

Your examples are notable for the singular case in each.  The concept that these types of violations will add up to millions of votes has been challenges by almost every Secretary of State and those that study the problem.  And again, you are making that "show on the other foor" assumption.  I would object if Hillary, Obama, Bernie or the Pope asked for this information.  There already is far too much personal information stored centrally.  This will only confound the problem.It will also make Russian mischief easier.

Donald J Trump is your death. You are finished.

Nah, you guys are off the chain. You are unhinged. You are dangerous. The DHS just declared ANTIFA a terrorist organization. That proves right there that if you're a liberal, you better be very careful, because they are watching you very closely. They know that we are just standing our ground. You on the other hand, are crossing the line - big time. You are the ones on the attack, and you are threatening our President with violence. I actually have spoken to them about dangerous people, FYI. We are not going to allow you to go one step further. The whole act is inciting violence, and we are more than ready.

I do believe the FBI about Clinton. That she "was grossly negligent," and if you know anything about law, gross negligence equates to fraud.

The NYT, CNN, WaPO, ABC, NBC, and CBS have ALL retracted stories, like the "17 agencies," HOAX. Stephen Hawking? No one can investigate it, so until I see the proof that he is actually saying those things himself, I won't JUST BELIEVE it. You on the other hand just believe everything that suits your narrative.

Invasion? You're the ones that are pissing off Russia with this garbage. Good thing Trump is going to meet Putin on the 7th to set the record straight. And you still have totally ignored the issue of the CONTENT of the emails. Like I said, YOU JUST WON'T ANSWER IT. You KNOW very damn well that she stepped down because the emails proved fraud. You still point to Russia. It's really pathetic. You might need to go see a psychiatrist - just my personal opinion. She didn't step down because Russia hacked anything, she stepped down because SHE SENT EMAILS IMPLICATING HER IN FRAUD AND GOT BUSTED.

Bye!

They admitted it was a HOAX. You still promote it. It's ridiculous.

CNN has no credibility. You are telling Raph that he needs to distinguish between news and commentary, yet you attack me for posting Natasha and Diamond and Silk and act like I'm trying to present them as the Oxford Dictionary, when it was obviously just commentary. You are the one who doesn't get it.

It doesn't matter what it's a reference to. You are basically making fun of the woman's weight, and yet you are in league with the feminists. You're like two peas in a pod. You just fat-shamed someone. That's shallow. How does that make you any better than Trump for calling Rosie a fat pig? You really don't have any place to criticize him when you are judging someone you don't even know. At least the feud between Rosie and Trump was between two people who knew each other. You're a judgmental prick.

Don't forget, Charlottesville. Your Mayor ordered the cops to stand down against a terrorist organization. How dare you liberals defend this act of violence and terror.

@mhorndisk:

Your assertion is meaningless.

It's the report authors' assertion — not mine. To the extent that their assertion and report were both evidently meaningless to you, I have no doubt.

Ok, it's all right there. Next Topic Post!