• Login
    • Search
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Torrents
    1. Home
    2. ManHandler
    3. Posts
    • Profile
    • Following 0
    • Followers 1
    • Topics 399
    • Posts 1292
    • Best 21
    • Controversial 0
    • Groups 1

    Posts made by ManHandler

    • Biden’s National Security Pick Says U.S. Should “Encourage China’s Rise”

      It's no surprise considering the Biden's got millions from China. Talk about compromised?

      Joe Biden has tapped Jake Sullivan to be his National Security Adviser, a Clinton minion who had previously advocated that the United States should facilitate the rise of Communist China.

      During a 2017 lecture at the Lowy Institute, Sullivan, who worked for Hillary Clinton while she was Secretary of State, said China’s growing influence on the world should result in a “fair regional order.”

      “We need to strike a middle course – one that encourages China’s rise in a manner consistent with an open, fair, rules-based, regional order,” Sullivan said.

      “This will require care and prudence and strategic foresight, and maybe even more basically it will require sustained attention. It may not have escaped your notice that these are not in ample supply in Washington right now.”

      Sullivan said China policy needs to be about more than just bilateral cooperation, “it needs to be about our ties to the region that create an environment more conducive to a peaceful and positive sum Chinese rise,” he said.

      Sullivan even scolded Europe for not doing as much as the U.S., “which is doing everything we can to both facilitate and encourage China’s economic rise and to support it because a thriving China is good for Europe, it’s good for the United States, it’s good for Asia.”

      “But that the same time, to be clear about the parameters within which China is rising and I worry that the Europeans have basically allowed the United States to do that bit of it without really doing it so much themselves,” he added.

      President Trump has stated many times that if Biden wins, “China will own the United States,” given his weak stance on the Communist nation and shady deals inked in Beijing by his son Hunter.

      If Biden wins—China will OWN the United States… pic.twitter.com/lFGOlCf82y
          — Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) October 15, 2020

      It would appear if Biden successfully steals the presidency, China won’t be held accountable for unleashing the coronavirus on the world or bleeding out America for decades through one-sided trade deals.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • "This is Disputed!" - Twitter

      Well yes, twit-idiots… the tweet itself is a dispute of the other side, with evidence filed in court, so why don't their tweets get labelled "disputed," when they say Biden won? So the Commander in Chief is disputed, but his dispute of the other side isn't? When he's taking it to court, literally disputing it? It's game over. Trump won.

      EDIT - removed banned word - raphjd

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • RE: The GSA has informed the President-elect that the Trump administration is ready

      Ok well I'm not sure what that has to do with anything.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • RE: The GSA has informed the President-elect that the Trump administration is ready

      You're clearly upset. Go cry somewhere else. You know the facts are in, the Kraken has been released. It's over for your party.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • It's Official, Trump Won

      Pennsylvania has decided that it will go to Trump, not Biden, because the legislature will remove the SOS from the process due to fraud. Wisconsin, 150,000 ballots for Biden will be discarded, going to Trump, because they were unsolicited which is unlawful in WI. Georgia won't allow it's ballots to be checked for signatures at the moment but this is blatantly unlawful and it's going to Trump.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • RE: The GSA has informed the President-elect that the Trump administration is ready

      I didn't say that. Certifying the electors is what is merely a procedural step. He doesn't have to concede, and he'll still be President, because the electors will be assigned by the states now, thanks to your democratic party cheating putting the whole thing up to confusion.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • RE: Judge Declares PA Election Fraud, Gives Legislators power to choose electors

      It's pretty official now that Biden won't get the electors in PA. After the hearing with Giulliani, the people all agreed that there's unmistakable, undeniable fraud.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • RE: The GSA has informed the President-elect that the Trump administration is ready

      Can you just wrap up what that means in your own words? Make it two sentences. It sounds like some kind of Democrat bullshit where they're crying that Trump won't concede. Well guess what? He doesn't have to. That's the fucking law. Get over it. It's totally Constitutional what Trump is doing and half the country KNOWS, doesn't just believe there's fraud. So stick that up your you know what. You're wrong.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • RE: WI to cancel 100K Biden ballots

      Vitriol and personal bias is equated to: telling you that you're wrong and don't know what you're talking about and you evading the topic. I strongly disagree with your attitude. But you haven't really said anything for me to disagree with in the arena of facts. Because you're not talking about the subject. You're just confused. It's all feelings with you, no facts. Your attitude has nothing to do with reality or logic. Trump won.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • RE: CNN reports that Trump will probably win, regardless.

      Basically, he's making the case that because of Democrats pushing the mail in voting which is the most susceptible to proven fraud, it would throw the electors to the legislators, not the popular vote, because it's a Republic. Even this guy who hates Trump, admits that he's probably going to be President. I guess Trump has been good for their ratings. I disagree with this guy on a lot, but I don't think he's stupid.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • RE: WI to cancel 100K Biden ballots

      That's a bunch of gobbledey gook. I'm not attempting to keep the forum lively. You asked. And I'm reporting updates from the election that MSM has ignored to inform you, such as what's happening in WI right now, the title of this post.. which you have ignored. I also don't use the word believe in my vocabulary when speaking about what I represent or stand for. I go with what I know. My words are not different from my actions. I gotta friend who wrote in Bernie, and he knows that democrats cheated, cuz they cheated Bernie (who had big crowds), and would rather have Trump. What you're trying to assume is really not a coherent argument.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • RE: WI to cancel 100K Biden ballots

      He got 74 million votes, that's 12 million more than last election. And Biden managed to get 11 million more votes than Obama. There was no one at Biden's rallies. The democrats lost the house seats, didn't gain one. How did Biden win if dems lost 11 house seats? That's because of the fake ballots that they didn't have time to fill out completely and only marked Biden and skipped all the other seats. It's clear fraud, and the topic please… Joe Biden didn't get 80 million votes. Trump was doing 35% of the black community. 28% of the gay and trans. No way Biden won. It's total fraud.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • RE: WI to cancel 100K Biden ballots

      Are you kidding? Because he didn't get enough votes silly. But I'd much rather have Trump, despite his faults, than Biden (and I don't need to explain why cuz I already have). At least there's populism behind Trump.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • RE: WI to cancel 100K Biden ballots

      I did. I voted for Kanye. Wrote in his name.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • Sydney Powell: We have the check stubs paid to ballot harvestors.

      "We've got pictures of the check stubs paid to people to ballot harvest." Oh and remember when Georgia said there was a water pipe burst so they had to stop counting. Turns out there was no pipe burst, that's why the counting didn't actually stop and Biden got ballots dumped in the hundreds of thousands.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • WI to cancel 100K Biden ballots

      The Wisconsin legislature made it almost impossible to cheat with Mail in ballots, by requiring that there must be a written request for one, of which at the moment, it appears that there are 100K ballots that do not meet that criteria. And possibly as many as 150K, they're still counting. These votes will have to be tossed, giving the state to Trump. That would put Trump ahead by 80K, rather than behind 20K.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • CNN reports that Trump will probably win, regardless.

      In a video released before the election but attracting fresh attention, CNN’s Fareed Zakaria explained the “legal and constitutional” case by which President Trump could stay in office even if he loses the election.

      In a moment of actual journalistic integrity, which is incredibly rare these days for CNN, Zakaria outlined how Trump could retain the presidency “without actually winning the vote.”

      Explaining how the system worked, Zakaria said electors are determined by that state’s popular vote, but that this is “not a constitutional obligation.”

      The host then outlined the exact scenario that happened on election day, with Trump leading on November 3rd but then mail-in ballots swinging the result for Biden, prompting a flurry of challenges and lawsuits.

      “Taking account of the confusion, legislatures decide to choose the electors themselves,” said Zakaria before pointing out that eight out of nine key swing states have Republican legislatures.

      “If one or more decide that balloting is chaotic and marked by irregularities, they could send what they regard as the legitimate slate of electors, which would be Republican.”

      Adding to the confusion, Democrats from the same states would also send their electors to Washington, which Zakaria suggested could be “part of the Republican plan.”

      “Because you see when Congress convenes on January 6 to tally the electors’ votes, there would be challenges to the legitimacy of some electors,” explained Zakaria.

      This would prompt Congressional Republicans to argue that disputed states should not be counted, which would ensure Biden’s could not reach 270 electoral college votes.

      “At that point, the constitution clearly directs that the House of Representatives vote to determine the presidential election, but it does so with each state casting a single ballot,” said Zakaria, noting that this process would result in the re-election of Donald Trump.

      “Trump doesn’t have to do anything other than accept this outcome, which is constitutional,” concluded Zakaria.

      The video has caused consternation amongst some Biden supporters, who are eagerly pointing out that it was released before the election.

      However, this makes no difference whatsoever. Zakaria’s explanation of how Trump could still win is still in play.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • Judge Declares PA Election Fraud, Gives Legislators power to choose electors

      Oh, and I guess your MSM isn't mentioning that today. The judge declared that the election commission acted unlawfully, and therefore their certification of the vote is invalid. It will go to the legislators, who have already been planning this for a week.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • RE: The GSA has informed the President-elect that the Trump administration is ready

      Are you fucking kidding me? Sabotage like the guy at the FBI who pleaded guilty to altering an email to spy on Trump's incoming administration? You're in denial.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • RE: DICKSUCKERS at the FBI can't tell us if the vote was legit

      They're incompetent, it doesn't mean someone who actually sucks dick, duh.

      posted in Politics & Debate
      ManHandler
      ManHandler
    • 1
    • 2
    • 40
    • 41
    • 42
    • 43
    • 44
    • 64
    • 65
    • 42 / 65