Posts made by ManHandler

Oh really? I thought you might be able to do that right now considering you claim to have absolute right of truth passport. Like you're the news. Who said you were the authority anyway?

Yea you just totally evaded the conversation you bitch.

I actually do take your posts very seriously. I'm ok if that makes you feel important.

I think your definition of Democracy is factually, and demonstrably incorrect, and what you're describing as a democracy, is in fact, populism. Demos, like Mars' moon, means fear.

Democracy means that the majority rules. That by definition, majority rule, means minorities are the losers. Black people, gay people, are minorities. Democracy, means that majority rules, and gays and black people are not majorities. You are so stupid I can't even finish explaining this to you. It's two wolves and one sheep deciding what's for dinner. It's 33 whites hanging one black. That is Democracy, you fucking idiots.

Really? Like a video of them taking suitcases full of ballots from under the table right after they asked all the ballot counters to leave? An actual video of that happening?

Oh jeez nobody wants to read about you dripping with precum at the idea that you might be right. But you're still not providing anything at all really

Are you fucking kidding me? Give me and Raph, and maybe Furio, just one! LOL, I bet that would be appropriate, finally… We've been waiting for centuries it seems.

Dude. You got a lot to say, but it's based on a false premise. We know that cheating occured. We know it. It's a fact. I literally don't give a shit about what the corrupt court said. Like I told you already. We already knew this would go to the SCOTUS and that those minor court decisions would be appealed, 6 months ago… So

Nah, these are self-evident Truths. Everyone knows you guys flaut nations like Sweden and Norway but they're Capitalist. There has never been one God Damned example of a socialist program that succeeded or doesn't have a corrupt finish. You act like I'm not debating. I opened it up and you can't give any examples of one socialist thing that's good. It could be a program. It could be a country. It could be anything really but you just don't got shit do you????????

Oh, man. You just showed that you don't really have any idea what's going on. Yes, Giulliani is in the Legislature, but… he's also been involved in the Court Process.... I'm sorry to tell you that you are not informed, but someone has to. It is more of a formality, but that's where the remedy lies.

No, Calatar. You avoided defining "Democracy." What does that word mean? What does it mean to you? We need to define our understanding before we continue our little debate. I don't think you came along for no reason, recently…

Could you give some examples from your own mouth of how Infowars was "wrong?" I don't like copy and paste from people, I'd like you're own understanding in cuneiform.

OMG STFU YOU STUPID CRYBABIES. Just say what the fuck you got to say and take the shit that you get dished back. It's so pathetic. Just focus on what the fuck you stand for and stand for it. Speak up. Just make your point and quit acting like a little bitch. Ohh… someone didn't agree with me, well fuck you! COol. Just say what you got to say and quit being little twats.

Shut up! You don't even know what the definition of Democracy is! Calatar.

Ok. So if you post something from CNN, I'm sorry but my browser doesn't allow me to visit that site. So why don't you just go into your browser and make sure you can't see what Infowars says? You have the freedom of choice! I like to hear all viewpoints, and regardless if someone was wrong about one little thing that you can't even name… I'll consider your argument dumb.

Your approach and premise is all wrong. Trump’s lawyers are going to the Legislatures for their remedy, not the courts. They’re only going to the courts to get the ball moving towards the SCOTUS, who is eager to exercise their power. SCOTUS has already been following the case, and Alito is like: Gimme Dat Now. Trump's team doesn't need the lower courts, he already knows what they're going to do. The process with those courts is merely a formality, the appeal to SCOTUS has already been prepared.

Right… it was just an "accident." Shut up. That's dumb. Computers don't forget how to add 1 + 1.

Bullshit. Communism and Socialism are the same thing. Socialism is Communism "Lite." Everyone knows it. The problem with the United States is that it adopted a lot of Socialist programs under the New Deal. You guys are quick to say, "the police is socialist so socialism is good." Then turn to say that the "police should be defunded." It's so hypocritical and dumb it makes me laugh at how stupid you are. Social Security… Socialist. Politicians use it as a rainy day fund for sippin' margaritas on the beach and Joe Biden is one of them and so is Pelosi. That's why the paychecks keep getting smaller and smaller.

You are in denial. There was mass voter fraud and the proof is there. Giulliani is not just making a "bunch of claims." He has evidence. An affidavit is evidence, maybe not proof. But it is evidence. And he has over 1,000 now. People willing to stand up to being condemned by the likes of your kind. The evidence then goes through a process before it becomes proof. That involves a Jury. So you may not be convinced, but you aren't there at the trial. They are not the same claims, they are different in every state.

@Calatar:

You're right - it is just a theory… or a claim.  He never provided any evidence to support this belief and has since never provided any proof.  So it seems like it was just another of his spurious claims.

I'm certain people on his team prepared - evidenced by the number of lawsuits that were filed shortly afterwards.  The problem is the proof... which a court will require.  And, in court, perjury is a thing... so they can't lie.  And in every instance where a case was brought before a judge, the prepared and organised team produced... nothing.  And/or admitted that their claim was... not quite right ("there was a non-zero number of people in the room" being the most famous response).

So I think you're right - they did prepare.  But sadly for them, there was nothing actually that went wrong and so they couldn't continue.

Well that's just factually ridiculous. Sure some of the claims and lawsuits have been tossed, but the appeals process means it's going to the SCOTUS. So you claiming that it's spurious or whatever means nothing because we already established that this would happen and it would go to the top. You're claiming victory before the process has played out, and that's dumb. Just today a video was released of them pulling ballots out from under a table after they told everyone they were done.

No it's not. And you're also not an authority on such things. What I said is absolutely the purpose of the Electoral College. So that Oklahoma doesn't have to be ruled by New York. It's very simple. Different people, different lives, different places, different economies, different votes. That is precisely why the people of Oklahoma or Kansas don't want to abolish the Electoral College. Deny it if you like, your opinion is not even a case or a defense.